| Literature DB >> 30973289 |
Giulia S Rossi, Louise Tunnah, Keri E Martin, Andy J Turko, D Scott Taylor, Suzanne Currie, Patricia A Wright.
Abstract
Hydrogen sulfide (H 2 S) is a potent respiratory toxin that makes sulfidic environments tolerable to only a few organisms. We report the presence of fishes ( Kryptolebias marmoratus , Poecilia orri , Gambusia sp., and Dormitator maculatus ) in Belizean mangrove pools with extremely high H 2 S concentrations (up to 1,166 μM) that would be lethal for most fishes. Thus, we asked whether the three most prevalent species ( Kryptolebias , Poecilia , and Gambusia ) persist in sulfidic pools because they are exceptionally H 2 S tolerant and/or because they can leave water (emerse) and completely avoid H 2 S. We show that both physiological tolerance and emersion behavior are important. Kryptolebias demonstrated high H 2 S tolerance, as they lost equilibrium significantly later than Poecilia and Gambusia during H 2 S exposure ( 1,188 ± 21 μM H 2 S). However, the fact that all species lost equilibrium at an ecologically relevant [H 2 S] suggests that physiological tolerance may suffice at moderate H 2 S concentrations but that another strategy is required to endure higher concentrations. In support of the avoidance behavior hypothesis, H 2 S elicited an emersion response in all species. Kryptolebias was most sensitive to H 2 S and emersed at H 2 S concentrations 52% and 34% lower than Poecilia and Gambusia , respectively. Moreover, H 2 S exposure caused Kryptolebias to emerse more frequently and spend more time out of water compared to control conditions. We suggest that physiological H 2 S tolerance and emersion behavior are complementary strategies. The superior H 2 S tolerance and amphibious capability of Kryptolebias may explain why this species was more prevalent in H 2 S-rich environments than other local fishes.Entities:
Keywords: sp.; HS; amphibious fish; ecological toxicant; hypoxia; loss of equilibrium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30973289 DOI: 10.1086/703117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Biochem Zool ISSN: 1522-2152 Impact factor: 2.247