Oscar A Sosa1, Daniel J Repeta2, Edward F DeLong1, Mohammad D Ashkezari3, David M Karl1. 1. Daniel K. Inouye Center for Microbial Oceanography: Research and Education, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA. 2. Department of Marine Chemistry and Geochemistry, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 02540, USA. 3. School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98105, USA.
Abstract
In tropical and subtropical oceanic surface waters phosphate scarcity can limit microbial productivity. However, these environments also have bioavailable forms of phosphorus incorporated into dissolved organic matter (DOM) that microbes with the necessary transport and hydrolysis metabolic pathways can access to supplement their phosphorus requirements. In this study we evaluated how the environment shapes the abundance and taxonomic distribution of the bacterial carbon-phosphorus (C-P) lyase pathway, an enzyme complex evolved to extract phosphate from phosphonates. Phosphonates are organophosphorus compounds characterized by a highly stable C-P bond and are enriched in marine DOM. Similar to other known bacterial adaptions to low phosphate environments, C-P lyase was found to become more prevalent as phosphate concentrations decreased. C-P lyase was particularly enriched in the Mediterranean Sea and North Atlantic Ocean, two regions that feature sustained periods of phosphate depletion. In these regions, C-P lyase was prevalent in several lineages of Alphaproteobacteria (Pelagibacter, SAR116, Roseobacter and Rhodospirillales), Gammaproteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. The global scope of this analysis supports previous studies that infer phosphonate catabolism via C-P lyase is an important adaptive strategy implemented by bacteria to alleviate phosphate limitation and expands the known geographic extent and taxonomic affiliation of this metabolic pathway in the ocean.
In tropical and subtropical oceanic surface waters phosphate scarcity can limit microbial productivity. However, these environments also have bioavailable forms of phosphorus incorporated into dissolved organic matter (DOM) that microbes with the necessary transport and hydrolysis metabolic pathways can access to supplement their phosphorus requirements. In this study we evaluated how the environment shapes the abundance and taxonomic distribution of the bacterial carbon-phosphorus (C-P) lyase pathway, an enzyme complex evolved to extract phosphate from phosphonates. Phosphonates are organophosphoruscompounds characterized by a highly stable C-P bond and are enriched in marine DOM. Similar to other known bacterial adaptions to low phosphate environments, C-P lyase was found to become more prevalent as phosphateconcentrations decreased. C-P lyase was particularly enriched in the Mediterranean Sea and North Atlantic Ocean, two regions that feature sustained periods of phosphate depletion. In these regions, C-P lyase was prevalent in several lineages of Alphaproteobacteria (Pelagibacter, SAR116, Roseobacter and Rhodospirillales), Gammaproteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. The global scope of this analysis supports previous studies that infer phosphonatecatabolism via C-P lyase is an important adaptive strategy implemented by bacteria to alleviate phosphate limitation and expands the known geographic extent and taxonomic affiliation of this metabolic pathway in the ocean.
Phosphorus (P) is essential to all living organisms for growth, energetics and nucleic acid synthesis. P is most readily available to microorganisms as inorganicphosphate (Pi). However, vast ocean regions in tropical and subtropical latitudes are characterized by persistent low Pi concentrations, a condition that has been shown to limit microbial productivity (Krom et al., 1991; Cotner et al., 1997; Wu et al., 2000; Thingstad et al., 2005; Moore et al., 2013). The increasingly recognized importance of Pi availability to the ecology of marine plankton (Karl et al., 2001; Ammerman et al., 2003; Dyhrman et al., 2007) and the detailed understanding of the physiological response of Escherichia coli and other reference organisms to Pi deficiency have set the stage to investigate the genetic adaptations and physiological acclimations marine microorganisms display to cope with P scarcity.A characteristicfeature of the bacterial Pi deficiency response is the expression of enzymes and pathways that have evolved to extract P from organiccompounds (Wackett et al., 1987; Wanner, 1998). In oligotrophic oceanic environments, the inventory of dissolved organicphosphorus (DOP) compounds typically exceeds the pool of free Pi and the P stored in particulate organic matter (Björkman and Karl, 2003; Lomas et al., 2010). Phosphate esters are the largest identifiable chemical class of P‐containing compounds in marine dissolved organic matter (DOM), followed by phosphonates, reduced P compounds (P oxidation state of +3) with a direct C–P electron bond (Kolowith et al., 2001; Young and Ingalls, 2010). Numerically dominant bacterial groups in marine surface waters express enzymes known as alkaline phosphatases (APases) to hydrolyze phosphate esters under Pi stress (Kathuria and Martiny, 2010). Similarly, microorganisms have evolved specialized enzymatic pathways designed to break the C–P bond of phosphonates in order to assimilate P (Quinn et al., 2007; White and Metcalf, 2007). These pathways are widespread in marine microorganisms, especially among the Proteobacteria (Villarreal‐Chiu et al., 2012) and their distribution seems to vary across ecosystems (Martinez et al., 2010).Among the known phosphonate degradation pathways, bacterial C–P lyase plays a unique role in the biogeochemistry of the ocean. C–P lyase is a multi‐enzyme complex encoded by a set of co‐transcribed genes (Metcalf and Wanner, 1993; Seweryn et al., 2015) whose expression is controlled by Pi concentration as part of the Pho regulon that responds to Pi starvation in bacteria (Chen et al., 1990). C–P lyase can degrade a broad range of phosphonate substrates (Kononova and Nesmeyanova, 2002; White and Metcalf, 2007) including alkyl phosphonates, the major class of phosphonates identified in marine high molecular weight (HMW) DOM (Repeta et al., 2016). The C–P bond cleavage reaction of alkyl phosphonates by the C–P lyase pathway is encoded by the gene phnJ and is essential for organisms to recover Pi from phosphonates (Kamat et al., 2013). This reaction also releases the attached alkyl group of the phosphonate as the corresponding alkane (Kamat et al., 2013; Seweryn et al., 2015). This latter property has linked C–P lyase degradation of methylphosphonate, one of the most abundant alkylphosphonates found in HMW DOM, to the slight supersaturation of methane observed throughout marine surface waters (Karl et al., 2008; Repeta et al., 2016), a phenomenon known as the marine methane paradox (Kiene, 1991).In this study, we used a metagenomic approach to compare Pi concentration and other environmental parameters to the abundance of genes encoding enzymes that form the C–P lyase pathway for phosphonate degradation and compared this to other pathways implicated in phosphonatecatabolism, DOP turnover and P acquisition. These included the phosphonate hydrolysis pathways encoded by phnX and phnA which mediate the degradation of phosphonacetaldehyde and phosphonacetate, respectively (Quinn et al., 2007); the APases encoded by phoX, phoD and phoA; and the high‐affinity Pi membrane transport system proteins encoded by pstABCS. Two additional genes, phoB and plcP, were included in the analysis to serve as markers of Pi deficiency. phoB encodes a transcription activator of the Pi starvation response in bacteria (Wanner and Chang, 1987) and plcP encodes a phospholipase enzyme involved in cell membrane phospholipid substitution to save P and is prevalent in Pi limited ocean regions (Carini et al., 2015; Sebastián et al., 2016). We also used phylogenetic information to identify which bacterial groups encode C–P lyase across different oceanic regions. Through this approach, we evaluate how Pi concentration shapes the distribution and abundance of C–P lyase in marine bacterial communities relative to other P acquisition pathways and how this interaction may in turn influence the cycling of DOM phosphonates in marine surface waters.
Results
An exploratory heat map of C–P lyase gene phnJ relative abundance in samples collected at 5 m depth indicated that C–P lyase was enriched in Pi‐depleted ocean regions (Fig. 1). Of the environmental parameters tested, Pi concentration had the strongest negative correlation with the relative abundance of C–P lyase in the epipelagic zone (EPZ), followed by silicate and inorganicnitrogen (N, nitrate plus nitrite) (Table 1). Using the mean annual Pi concentration data from the World Ocean Atlas (WOA) and the monthly Pi climatology of Pelagic Interactions Scheme for Carbon and Ecosystem Studies (PISCES) improved this correlation (Table 1). In addition, dissolved iron (Fe) and the dissolved Fe:Pi molar ratio obtained from PISCES had a significant positive correlation with C–P lyase relative abundance in the EPZ (Table 1).
Figure 1
Distribution of C–P lyase and phosphate in marine surface waters. The circles represent metagenomic sampling locations of Tara Oceans in surface waters (5 m depth) and the colour scale indicates the percentage of organisms possessing the C–P lyase pathway gene phnJ. The map background colour gradient represents the mean annual inorganic phosphate concentration in surface waters obtained from the WOA 2009 mean annual climatology.
Table 1
Correlation analyses of phnJ relative abundance and environmental parameters from Tara Oceans, the World Ocean Atlas (WOA) mean annual climatology, and the Pelagic Interactions Scheme for Carbon and Ecosystem Studies (PISCES) monthly climatology.
Distribution of C–P lyase and phosphate in marine surface waters. The circles represent metagenomic sampling locations of Tara Oceans in surface waters (5 m depth) and the colour scale indicates the percentage of organisms possessing the C–P lyase pathway gene phnJ. The map background colour gradient represents the mean annual inorganicphosphateconcentration in surface waters obtained from the WOA 2009 mean annual climatology.Correlation analyses of phnJ relative abundance and environmental parameters from Tara Oceans, the World Ocean Atlas (WOA) mean annual climatology, and the Pelagic Interactions Scheme for Carbon and Ecosystem Studies (PISCES) monthly climatology.Significance level: <0.001 (***), <0.01 (**), <0.05 (*).In our regression model of log‐transformed phnJ relative abundance with two predictors, ocean region and log‐transformed Pi concentration from WOA, both were significant at the 0.001 level. To further evaluate the relationship between C–P lyase gene abundance and Pi concentration, we compared the Pi WOA mean annual climatology to the relative abundance of representative genes encoding alternate P acquisition pathways and Pi stress marker genes (Fig. 2). Of the genes tested, the abundance of high‐affinity Pi uptake system gene pstA had one of the highest negative correlation with Pi (r
2 = 0.67, P < 0.001), and occurred in approximately half of the organisms in the EPZ in the Mediterranean Sea (MS) and North Atlantic Ocean (NAO) (Fig. 2A). The slope of the relationship of pstA relative abundance with Pi was not significantly different from the high‐affinity Pi uptake genes pstBCS (P > 0.05; Supporting Information Table S1). The Pi stress marker genes phoB had the next strongest negative correlation with Pi (r
2 = 0.52, P < 0.001; Fig. 2B) after pstABCS, followed by the plcP gene for phospholipid substitution (r
2 = 0.45, P < 0.001; Fig. 2C). The C–P lyase catalytic gene phnJ had the fourth strongest negative relationship with Pi (r
2 = 0.35, P < 0.001; Fig. 2D). The slope of the regression of phnJ against Pi was not significantly different from the slope of the regressions of the C–P lyase catalytic genes phnGHIKL (P > 0.05; Supporting Information Table S1). The regression of the abundance of C–P lyase pathway catalytic genes against WOA Pi had the highest inverse slopes, followed by the regressions of Pi transport genes and plcP (Supporting Information Table S1). The phosphonate transport gene phnD (r
2 = 0.28, P < 0.01; Fig. 2E) and the APase encoded by phoX (r
2 = 0.23, P < 0.001; Fig. 2F) followed similar inverse relationships with Pi though not as robust as for C–P lyase pathway catalytic genes and high‐affinity Pi transport genes. The phosphonoacetaldehyde hydrolase encoded by phnX (r
2 = 0.08, P < 0.05) also had a significant, albeit weak, negative relationship with Pi (Fig. 2E). The remaining genes tested did not follow a significant negative relationship with Pi (P > 0.05; Supporting Information Table S1).
Figure 2
Phosphorus acquisition gene relative abundance with respect to phosphate concentration in the epipelagic zone. Gene abundance was normalized to recA and expressed as a percentage of organisms. Phosphate concentrations were obtained from the WOA. The relative abundance and phosphate axes were log10‐transformed. A. Linear model of high‐affinity Pi transport gene pstA. B. Pho regulon gene phoB. C. Phospholipase for membrane lipid remodelling gene plcP. D. C–P lyase gene phnJ. E. Phosphonate transport gene phnD. F. Alkaline phosphatase gene phoX. G. Phosphonoacetaldehyde hydrolase gene phnX. Data points are colour coded by ocean region. All linear regression models had a significant inverse relationship between gene relative abundance and phosphate concentration (P < 0.05).
Phosphorus acquisition gene relative abundance with respect to phosphateconcentration in the epipelagic zone. Gene abundance was normalized to recA and expressed as a percentage of organisms. Phosphateconcentrations were obtained from the WOA. The relative abundance and phosphate axes were log10‐transformed. A. Linear model of high‐affinity Pi transport gene pstA. B. Pho regulon gene phoB. C. Phospholipase for membrane lipid remodelling gene plcP. D. C–P lyase gene phnJ. E. Phosphonate transport gene phnD. F. Alkaline phosphatase gene phoX. G. Phosphonoacetaldehyde hydrolase gene phnX. Data points are colour coded by ocean region. All linear regression models had a significant inverse relationship between gene relative abundance and phosphateconcentration (P < 0.05).Based on our analysis, the distribution of C–P lyase gene abundance was statistically distinct between oceanic regions in the EPZ [X
(7, N = 118) = 66.7, P < 6.8 × 10−12] and was significantly enriched in the MS and the NAO (P < 0.05) relative to all other ocean regions (Fig. 3A). C–P lyase abundance was lower than the high‐affinity Pi transport system genes pstABCS, the Pi stress response gene phoB and the phospholipid substitution gene plcP and occurred in 2%–24% of organisms in the EPZ in the MS and 0.2%–14% in the NAO. Outside these regions, C–P lyase representation declined to 0.04%–0.4% of organisms (Fig. 3). The abundance of C–P lyase was comparable to that of APases in the MS and NAO. phoX was present on average in 16% and 13% of organisms and phoD in 22% and 16% of organisms respectively. Outside these regions, phoX and phoD abundance did not decline as drastically as C–P lyase, remaining in 9%–17% and 2%–9% of organisms respectively. C–P lyase abundance was also similar to the abundance of phnX which occurred on average in 8% of organisms in the MS and in 0.2%–2% of organisms in the EPZ outside this region.
Figure 3
Abundance and taxonomic distribution of C–P lyase in representative ocean regions. A. C–P lyase in the epipelagic zone. B. C–P lyase in the mesopelagic zone. In each subfigure, the upper panel boxplots depict the distribution of the percentage of bacteria possessing C–P lyase gene phnJ in representative ocean regions. The ends of the box indicate the first and third quartiles. Whiskers extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range. Solid black symbols denote outliers. Ocean regions are ranked in descending order by the average relative abundance of phnJ. Ocean regions indicated with (*) were significantly enriched with C–P lyase relative to all other regions (P < 0.05). The lower panel bar charts indicate the average proportion of phnJ sequence abundance accounted for by different taxa. Taxa are indicated in different colour bars. Bars indicated as higher level taxa denote the abundance of additional subgroups within that lineage.
Abundance and taxonomic distribution of C–P lyase in representative ocean regions. A. C–P lyase in the epipelagic zone. B. C–P lyase in the mesopelagic zone. In each subfigure, the upper panel boxplots depict the distribution of the percentage of bacteria possessing C–P lyase gene phnJ in representative ocean regions. The ends of the box indicate the first and third quartiles. Whiskers extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range. Solid black symbols denote outliers. Ocean regions are ranked in descending order by the average relative abundance of phnJ. Ocean regions indicated with (*) were significantly enriched with C–P lyase relative to all other regions (P < 0.05). The lower panel bar charts indicate the average proportion of phnJ sequence abundance accounted for by different taxa. Taxa are indicated in different colour bars. Bars indicated as higher level taxa denote the abundance of additional subgroups within that lineage.In the mesopelagic zone (MPZ), C–P lyase relative abundance was significantly different across ocean basins [X
(5, N = 32) = 11.5, P = 0.043]. However, unlike the disproportional abundance of C–P lyase in the EPZ in the MS and NAO, C–P lyase was not significantly enriched in the MPZ of any ocean region (P > 0.05) and occurred on average in 0.2%–0.7% of organisms (Fig. 3B). Depth and dissolved oxygen had strong positive correlations with C–P lyase relative abundance in the MPZ, while temperature and Pi had significant negative correlations (Table 1). While C–P lyase abundance declined in the MPZ relative to the EPZ, APases and other phosphonate degradation pathways remained well represented in the MPZ. phoX occurred on average in 12%–19% of organisms while phoD was present on average in 11%–25%. phnX was also well represented in the MPZ, occurring in 8%–20% of organisms. In turn, phnA, which encodes a phosphonoacetate hydrolase, occurred in 30%–57% of organisms in this region.Based on our phylogenetic analysis, C–P lyase was present in multiple lineages of Proteobacteria, as well as in Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, and was particularly well represented in the Alphaproteobacteria (Supporting Information Fig. S1). The distinct increase of C–P lyase abundance in the MS and NAO was marked by an enrichment of sequences closely related to the C–P lyase of Pelagibacterales sp. HITCC7211, a representative of the SAR11 clade of Alphaproteobacteria (Carini et al., 2014). Pelagibacter C–P lyase contributed on average 47% and 30% of C–P lyase abundance in the MS and NAO sites, respectively, but was absent outside these regions (Fig. 3C). Another group of C–P lyase sequences that clustered with Actinobacteria sequences related to Streptomyces and Mycobacteria (Supporting Information Fig. S1; see also the expanded tree in the Supporting Information) was also prevalent in the EPZ in the MS and NAO but its abundance declined beyond these sites (Fig. 3).C–P lyase sequences closely related to those found in the SAR116 clade, in the marine Rhodobacteraceae including the Roseobacter clade, and in several Rhodospirillales lineages of Alphaproteobacteria (Supporting Information Fig. S1) were also well represented in the EPZ in the MS and NAO and were distributed more broadly in the marine environment (Fig. 3C and D). In the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre (NPSG) we identified 38 unique phnJ genes from the Station ALOHA gene catalogue which were most similar to those of Roseobacter and Rhodospirillales (Supporting Information Fig. S1; see also the expanded tree in the Supporting Information). C–P lyase was also associated with Deltaproteobacteria of the order Desulfovibrionales, several groups of Gammaproteobacteria including the Oceanospirillales, Vibrionales, Alteromonadales and Pseudomonadales, as well as with the candidate phylum Marinimicrobia (Supporting Information Fig. S1). We also found C–P lyase genes similar to those of marine Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria and Chloroflexi but their abundance was relatively minor (Fig. 3C and D). In the MPZ, C–P lyase associated with Gammaproteobacteria, Roseobacter and other groups of Alphaproteobacteria which made up a larger fraction of C–P lyase abundance compared to the EPZ, while Pelagibacter and SAR116 sequences diminished at these depths (Fig. 3D).In the EPZ, the relative enrichment of C–P lyase in specific taxonomic groups varied significantly (P < 0.05) across ocean regions (Fig. 4A). For example, C–P lyase was significantly enriched in Pelagibacter in the MS and NAO relative to all other ocean regions (P < 0.05). On average, C–P lyase occurred in 44% of Pelagibacter in the NAO and in 340% in the MS (Fig. 4A). Values > 100% are potentially indicative of the presence of multiple gene copies per genome. A similar C–P lyase enrichment in the MS and NAO was found in the SAR116 clade, Rhodobacteraceae, Rhizobiales, and Actinobacteria (Fig. 4A). C–P lyase was prevalent in the Rhodospirillales across all ocean regions, occurring on average in 60%–330% of organisms and was significantly higher in the MS relative to other ocean regions. C–P lyase was also significantly enriched in the Gammaproteobacteria in the EPZ in the MS relative to other ocean regions. In turn, in the MPZ, the average relative enrichment of C–P lyase only varied significantly (P < 0.05) in Pelagibacter, the SAR116 clade and Actinobacteria (Fig. 4B). In the NAO, for example, C–P lyase occurred on average in ~2% of Pelagibacter organisms and in 0.4% of Actinobacteria. In some sampling locations in the NAO, C–P lyase representation exceeded one copy per cell in the SAR116 clade. However, in neither of these taxa was C–P lyase significantly enriched in the MPZ in a particular ocean region. Nevertheless, on average C–P lyase persisted in a considerable proportion of bacteria in the Rhodobacteraceae (11%–40% of organisms) and Rhodospirillales (1%–37%) across all ocean regions in the MPZ (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4
Taxon‐specific enrichment of C–P lyase. The data were derived from Tara Oceans samples of the 0.22 μm size fraction collected in (A) the epipelagic zone or in (B) the mesopelagic zone in different ocean regions: Mediterranean Sea (MS), North Atlantic Ocean (NAO), Red Sea (RS), South Atlantic Ocean (SAO), Indian Ocean (IO), South Pacific Ocean (SPO), North Pacific Ocean (NPO) and Southern Ocean (SO). The boxplots depict the distribution of the percentage of bacteria possessing the C–P lyase gene phnJ. The ends of the box indicate the first and third quartiles. Whiskers extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range. Solid black symbols denote outliers. The boxplot colour scheme is based on the taxon bins in Fig. 3. The Rhodobacteraceae boxplot data include the Rhodobacteraceae and Roseobacter taxon bins in Fig. 3. Ocean regions indicated with (*) were significantly enriched with C–P lyase relative to all other regions (P < 0.05).
Taxon‐specific enrichment of C–P lyase. The data were derived from Tara Oceans samples of the 0.22 μm size fraction collected in (A) the epipelagic zone or in (B) the mesopelagic zone in different ocean regions: Mediterranean Sea (MS), North Atlantic Ocean (NAO), Red Sea (RS), South Atlantic Ocean (SAO), Indian Ocean (IO), South Pacific Ocean (SPO), North Pacific Ocean (NPO) and Southern Ocean (SO). The boxplots depict the distribution of the percentage of bacteria possessing the C–P lyase gene phnJ. The ends of the box indicate the first and third quartiles. Whiskers extend up to 1.5 times the interquartile range. Solid black symbols denote outliers. The boxplot colour scheme is based on the taxon bins in Fig. 3. The Rhodobacteraceae boxplot data include the Rhodobacteraceae and Roseobacter taxon bins in Fig. 3. Ocean regions indicated with (*) were significantly enriched with C–P lyase relative to all other regions (P < 0.05).The mapping of Tara Oceans metagenomic reads to the genome of Pelagibacterales sp. strain HTCC721 and to Tara Oceans metagenome‐assembled genomes (MAGs) revealed consistent enrichment patterns of C–P lyase in these taxonomic groups (S2). Based on read mapping, C–P lyase occurred on average in 628% (~6 copies cell−1) of the Pelagibacter population represented by the HTCC7211 genome in MS surface waters (5 m depth samples), and in 45% in the NAO and declined below 0.1% outside these regions (S2). A similar enrichment was observed for Pelagibacter with C–P lyase in the deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM), 352% (~4 copies cell−1) in the MS and 14% in the NAO. Among the Alphaproteobacteria MAGs, C–P lyase was prevalent in the SAR116 clade, Rhodospirillales (Thalassospira, Tistrella and unclassified sublineages), Rhodobacteraceae (Roseovarius, Roseobacter and unclassified sublineages) and Rhizobiales. In some of these populations, C–P lyase was persistent across all ocean regions and depths (S2). Among the Gammaproteobacteria MAGs, C–P lyase was prevalent in members of the Oceanospirillaceae (Salinicola and Halomonas), some Pseudomonas and only in a small percentage of Alteromonadales (S2). A subset of phn operons representative of the C–P lyase pathway found in SAR116 clade, Rhodospirillales, Oceanospirillales, and Marinimicrobia MAGs are presented in the Supporting Information S3.
Discussion
Microbes cope with nutrient limitation by modifying their cellular elemental requirements or by expanding the range of substrates they can metabolize to acquire the needed resource (Merchant and Helmann, 2012). In the ocean, Pi availability constitutes a major selective pressure that has shaped the genome content and adaptations exhibited by abundant bacterial populations (Coleman and Chisholm, 2010). In Pi‐limited ocean regions, for example sparing cellular P by replacing membrane phospholipids with non‐P lipids appears to be a common strategy used by phytoplankton, including abundant cyanobacteria like Prochlorococcus (Van Mooy et al., 2006, 2009), and heterotrophic bacteria (Carini et al., 2015; Sebastián et al., 2016) to economize the P available in the cell. The strong inverse relationship we observed between global ocean Pi concentration and the abundance of phoB of the Pi stress response regulatory system and plcP for cell membrane phospholipid substitution is consistent with these observations. The strong inverse correlations between Pi and pathways for Pi transport systems and pathways for transport and hydrolysis of bioavailable organic P compounds in DOM (phosphonates and phosphate esters) are also in agreement with their critical role in bacteria to cope with Pi limitation in the ocean (Dyhrman et al. 2007).Our analyses revealed an enrichment of C–P lyase in bacterial communities in the EPZ in the MS and NAO, confirming the results of Coleman and Chisholm (2010) who found C–P lyase to be more prevalent in Pelagibacter populations in the North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre near Bermuda relative to the NPSG near Hawai‘i. The prevalence of genes encoding phosphonate transport proteins associated with Pelagibacter in the eastern MS has also been reported (Feingersch et al., 2010). Both studies attributed the enhanced abundance of C–P lyase pathway genes to low Pi concentration, a conclusion supported by our comparison of global C–P lyase abundance and Pi concentration data from Tara Oceans, WOA and PISCES. However, our comparison of the abundance and response of different Pi acquisition pathways and Pi stress markers to Pi concentration indicates that at the genome level, high‐affinity Pi uptake systems and phospholipid substitution are more prevalent adaptations than the C–P lyase pathway to cope with Pi scarcity in the EPZ (Fig. 2).In our analysis, both Pi concentration and ocean region were good proxies for the enrichment of C–P lyase in the bacterial community consistent with the extended periods of Pi scarcity observed in NAO and MS surface waters (Krom et al., 1991; Wu et al., 2000; Cavendar‐Bares et al., 2001) which can ultimately limit the growth of heterotrophic bacteria (Thingstad and Rassoulzadegan, 1995; Cotner et al., 1997). C–P lyase abundance was also negatively correlated with inorganic N and silicate. However, given that N scarcity and silicate are not expected to play a regulatory or biochemical role in the C–P lyase pathway, these trends may reflect the enrichment of C–P lyase with Pi scarcity which coincides with other oligotrophicconditions. In the NAO, Pi limitation is in great part driven by the additional N available through N2 fixation stimulated by the aeolian Fe supply from the Sahara Desert (Wu et al. 2000), and through atmospheric deposition (rainfall and aerosols) of bioavailable N (Singh et al. 2013). In turn, in the MS, particularly in the eastern basin, Pi limitation arises due to the high N:P ratio of external inputs including to a large extent atmospheric N deposition and the inflow waters from the western MS (Krom et al. 2010). The MS also receives vast quantities of Fe from Sahara Desert dust which is reflected in the increase of dissolved Feconcentrations in surface waters (Guieu et al., 2002). However, in this region, N2 fixation is not considered to play a primary role in Pi limitation (Krom et al., 2010). The importance of Fe in Pi limitation may explain the positive correlation between Feconcentration and phnJ abundance (Table 1). However, a direct relationship may exist between the two. The C–P lyase pathway protein PhnJ catalytic mechanism requires Fe for a redox‐active Fe–sulfur (4Fe–4S) cluster for C–P bond cleavage (Kamat et al., 2013; Seweryn et al., 2015). In addition, in a field study in the NPSG, del Valle and Karl (2014) found that adding dissolved Fe to surface water microbial communities enhanced the conversion of methylphosphonate to methane. These results suggest that Pi scarcity, and perhaps Fe availability, are key factors controlling the abundance and distribution of C–P lyase in marine surface waters.Despite experiencing very low Pi concentrations (< 20 nM) throughout the year, the DOP inventory in North Atlantic Subtropical Gyre surface waters is 4‐ to 7‐fold greater than Pi and particulate P (Torres‐Valdés et al., 2009; Lomas et al., 2010). Relative increases in APase activity and particulate organic P concomitant with DOP decline during the winter/spring phytoplankton bloom in this region were seen as indicative of enhanced DOP cycling (Lomas et al., 2010). Similarly, in the MS, particularly in the eastern basin where Pi concentrations < 10 nM can extend as deep as 450 m after winter mixing (Krom et al., 1991), enhanced APase activity (Zaccone et al., 2012) and net removal of DOP (Powley et al., 2017) reflect the critical role of DOP degradation in sustaining the bacterial P demand. PhoX and PhoD are prevalent APases in these regions (Sebastian and Ammerman, 2009; Kathuria and Martiny, 2010) and are likely involved in the high rates of DOP turnover. The comparable representation of C–P lyase and APases in the EPZ in MS and NAO indicates that phosphonates are a particularly important source of Pi to bacteria in these regions and that their degradation may contribute to the observed remineralization of DOP.In the MPZ, on the other hand, C–P lyase abundance declined considerably relative to the EPZ and the negative relationship with Pi was not as robust as with other environmental parameters (Table 1). This result may be partly explained by the lack of Tara Oceans metagenomes sampled in the MS MPZ which is expected to be depleted in Pi relative to other nutrients (Krom et al., 1991) and enriched in C–P lyase. In contrast to the decline of C–P lyase in the MPZ, the phosphonate hydrolases encoded by phnA and phnX became relatively more abundant. This is consistent with previous surveys of phosphonate degradation functions and in support of the hypothesis that phosphonate degradation at these depths functions independently of Pi and is instead important to obtain C and N (Quinn et al., 2007; Martínez et al., 2010; Luo et al., 2011; Chin et al., 2018). Thus, the distribution of C–P lyase in the EPZ is strongly linked to Pi scarcity.
Diversity and distribution of bacteria encoding C–P lyase
Pelagibacter populations possessing C–P lyase were prevalent in the EPZ in the MS and NAO. The occurrence of C–P lyase in this clade in the NAO (~45% of Pelagibacter) was consistent with a previous survey in the Sargasso Sea which found that up to ~52% of Pelagibacter carry the phn operon (Coleman and Chisholm, 2010). In the MS, however, we found that virtually all Pelagibacter carry C–P lyase as the occurrence of C–P lyase exceeded one copy per organism (> 100% relative abundance). Although C–P lyase was enriched in the numerically dominant Pelagibacter clade, we found that the increase of C–P lyase abundance in the MS and NAO was also driven by several lineages of Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria. Among the Alphaproteobacteria lineages, the enrichment of C–P lyase in the SAR116 clade and the Rhodospirillales had not been detected before. Similar to Pelagibacter, the SAR116 clade is an abundant member of the bacterial community and contains genes that encode functions characteristic of an oligotrophic lifestyle, such as the metabolism of one‐carbon organiccompounds and the light‐driven proton pump proteorhodopsin (Oh et al., 2010). The Rhodospirillales lineage is most closely related to the SAR116 clade (Luo, 2015) but differs from this lineage in that it is relatively less abundant in the marine environment and its cultured representatives can display copiotrophic lifestyles. For example, bacteria of the Rhodospirillales genus Thalassospira isolated in the MS were found to degrade and display chemotaxis towards phosphonates (Hütz et al., 2011). In turn, C–P lyase had been previously observed to be prevalent in the Roseobacter clade strains with sequenced genomes (Sosa et al., 2017). Even though our analysis of MAGs and C–P lyase sequences revealed some of the phylogenetic diversity of bacteria containing C–P lyase, particularly among the Alphaproteobacteria, the identity of other clusters of C–P lyase sequences should be explored further as more genomes become available including those similar to Actinobacteria C–P lyase and those found in MAGs of unclassified Gammaproteobacteria (Supporting Information Fig. S1). In the MS, for example, phosphonate transport genes have been associated with an uncultivated group of marine Actinobacteria (Ghai et al., 2013) but representative isolates are needed to determine if this group alsocontains C–P lyase and if this corresponds to the Actinobacteria C–P lyase enriched in the MS and NAO (Fig. 4A).The relatively high enrichment of C–P lyase in Pelagibacter, the SAR116 clade (> 100% or > 1 copy cell−1; Fig. 4) and in MAGs representative of the Rhodospirillales and Rhodobacteraceae (S2) in the EPZ in the MS and NAO, suggests that in these regions some bacteria may carry multiple copies of the C–P lyase pathway in their genome. It may also be that phnJ sequences classified as Pelagibacter or SAR116 clade C–P lyase were associated with additional groups of closely related bacteria but for which reference genomes are not available. A mechanism that would explain multiple copies of C–P lyase per cell is if bacteria encode the phn operon in plasmids, extrachromosomal elements of circular DNA that can replicate independently from the host genome. Plasmids may allow bacteria to regulate the copy number and expression of the C–P lyase pathway as needed to respond quickly to a shortage of Pi. The bacteria Sinorhizobium meliloti and Mesorhizobium loti of the order Rhizobiales of Alphaproteobacteria are known to carry the C–P lyase gene operon in plasmids (Huang et al., 2005) and several of the C–P lyase phnJ sequences we identified in the Tara Oceans metagenomes were closely related to sequences found in cultured representatives and MAGs of this taxonomic group (Supporting Information Fig. S1). Some members of the Roseobacter clade are also known to maintain low‐copy plasmids (~12 copies cell−1; Pradella et al., 2010) and these can carry genes that may support adaptations to their ecological niche (Petersen et al., 2013). Phylogenetic and genomic evidence suggests that the C–P lyase pathway has been acquired to a large degree through horizontal gene transfer, a mechanism thought to be facilitated by plasmids (Huang et al., 2005). Therefore, the lateral transfer of plasmids may also explain how several lineages of marine Alphaproteobacteria acquired the C–P lyase pathway.
Phosphonate cycling and oceanic aerobic methanogenesis
The enrichment of C–P lyase in diverse bacterial populations in the MS and NAO adds further support to the hypothesis that phosphonatecatabolism is an important means to obtain Pi in these regions. Acquiring C–P lyase in these Pi‐limited environments must be advantageous to bacteria because low Pi concentrations are conducive to active expression of this pathway through the Pho regulon, as observed in the Sargasso Sea for the marine filamentous cyanobacterium Trichodesmium (Dyhrman et al., 2006) and in cultures of Pelagibacterales sp. strain HTCC7211 (Carini et al., 2014), and because phosphonates present in HMW DOMcould be readily used by Pi‐starved bacterial communities and bacterial isolates encoding C–P lyase (Repeta et al., 2016; Sosa et al., 2017).Given that the occurrence of C–P lyase in Pelagibacter populations appears to be constrained to the MS and the NAO regions (Figs. 3C and 4; see also S2) other widespread bacterial groups containing C–P lyases such as the SAR116 clade, Roseobacter and Rhodospirillales populations may be responsible for the degradation of DOM phosphonates outside these regions. In support of this hypothesis, our analysis revealed a high relative abundance of C–P lyase in several of these lineages across all ocean regions and depths, especially among the Rhodospirillales (Fig. 4; see also S2). Our survey of Station ALOHA C–P lyase also identified several sequences similar to those of Roseobacter and Rhodospirillales but did not reveal matches to Pelagibacter (Supporting Information Fig. S1; see also the expanded tree in the Supporting Information). C–P lyase abundance at Station ALOHA averages 0.25%–0.33% (Sosa et al., 2017), in agreement with the estimates obtained in this study for the NPO region (Fig. 3A). The isolation of Roseobacter clade bacteria containing C–P lyase in this ocean region which were capable of degrading HMW DOM phosphonates (Sosa et al., 2017) also supports this view. These bacterial populations encoding C–P lyase are expected to acquire some cellular P from HMW DOM phosphonates.As a result of DOM phosphonate degradation, methane (when the substrate is methylphosphonate) and other hydrocarbons are released into marine surface waters. Repeta et al. (2016) proposed that HMW DOM methylphosphonate degradation could explain the oceanicmethane paradox, that is the slight supersaturation of methane observed in fully oxygenated marine surface waters (Kiene, 1991) which results in an outward flux of methane from the ocean to the atmosphere. The Pi‐limiting conditions and the enrichment of C–P lyase in the EPZ in the MS and the NAO suggest that the utilization of phosphonates, and perhaps the production of methane, is greater in these environments than in other ocean regions. However, a comprehensive analysis of methane dynamics across oligotrophic ocean regions with different nutrient regimes is needed to further evaluate the role of Pi in bacterial phosphonatecycling and methanogenesis.In summary, our study provides evidence that supports the role of Pi as an important nutrient controlling the abundance and distribution of the bacterial C–P lyase pathway in the upper ocean. In addition to Pi, the availability of Fe may also shape the distribution patterns of C–P lyase. Pi concentration might also affect the aerobic oceanicmethanesource strength, but this connection requires further understanding of the ecology of C–P lyase and marine phosphonates as well as additional observations of methane dynamics in the ocean. The acquisition and enrichment of C–P lyase in Pelagibacter, the SAR116 clade, Roseobacter and other abundant bacterial populations in the MS and NAO may allow these abundant organisms to subsist and compete for P stored in DOM phosphonates and illustrates how the selective pressure exerted by Pi depletion has made a genomic imprint at the community level. These results warrant field studies in Pi‐limited ocean regions to further evaluate the role that Pi, Fe, and different bacterial groups encoding C–P lyase play in the degradation of phosphonates and methanogenesis.
Experimental procedures
Identification and quantification of P acquisition genes
To quantify and compare the abundance of genes involved in P acquisition functions we queried the Ocean Microbial Reference Gene Catalogue (OM‐RGC) dataset (ftp://ftp.sra.ebi.ac.uk/vol1/ERA412/ERA412970/tab/OM‐RGC_seq.release.tsv.gz; see also http://ocean-microbiome.embl.de/companion.html) from the Tara Oceans expedition (Sunagawa et al. 2015) for protein‐coding genes based on their assigned Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) or Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) identifiers. These included the high‐affinity Pi transport genes pstA (COG0581), pstB (COG1117), pstC (COG0573) and pstS (COG0226); the C–P lyase pathway genes phnG (COG3624), phnH (COG3625), phnI (COG3626), phnJ (COG3627), phnK (COG4107) and phnL (COG4778); the phosphonate membrane transport proteins encoded by phnC (COG3638), phnD (COG3221) and phnE (COG2629); the phosphonate degradation genes phnW (K03430), which encodes 2‐aminoethylphosphonate pyruvate transaminase; phnX (K05306), which encodes phosphonoacetaldehyde hydrolase; and phnA (COG1524), which encodes phosphonoacetate hydrolase; and the APases encoded by phoA (COG1785), phoD (COG3540) and phoX (COG3211). In the comparison, we included the Pi starvation response regulator encoded by phoB (K07657) and the phospholipase C involved in phospholipid substitution encoded by plcP to serve as markers for Pi deficiency. Homologues of plcP were identified in the OM‐RGC by similarity with the protein sequence of Phaeobacter sp. MED139 using TBLASTN with an e‐value cutoff of 10−40 as described by Sebastián et al. (2016). We extracted the abundance of each gene from the Tara Oceans OM‐RGC profiles dataset (http://ocean-microbiome.embl.de/data/TARA243.gene.profile.release.gz) which was calculated from read counts mapped to each reference gene normalized by the gene‐length (Sunagawa et al., 2015). The total abundance of OM‐RGC sequences matching the same reference gene function was normalized to the total abundance of OM‐RGC sequences corresponding to the single‐copy marker gene recA (COG0468) as performed in previous studies (Martinez et al., 2010). This enabled a comparison of the relative abundance of P acquisition pathways on a per‐genome level across the Tara Oceans metagenomes. For the present study, we focused on metagenomes obtained from samples collected on 0.22 μm pore‐size membranes and pre‐filtered by a 0.45, 1.6 or 3.0 μm pore size membrane. With respect to depth, samples spanned the epipelagic zone (EPZ), which included surface waters (5 m) and the DCM layer (17–183 m), as well as the mesopelagic zone (MPZ), which extended from 200 m to 1000 m. We alsocompared the abundance of P acquisition genes across representative ocean regions based on the biogeographicclassification of the sampling location of each metagenome: Mediterranean Sea (MS), Red Sea (RS), North Atlantic Ocean (NAO), South Atlantic Ocean (SAO), North Pacific Ocean (NPO), South Pacific Ocean (SPO), Indian Ocean (IO) and Southern Ocean (SO).
Statistical analysis
We used the non‐parametric Kruskal–Wallis test to evaluate the significance level of differences in relative gene abundance between ocean regions and applied the Wilcoxon test with the Benjamini–Hochberg correction for multiple testing to calculate pairwise comparisons between ocean regions. Significance tests were implemented with the stats R software package (R Core Team, 2018). To evaluate which environmental parameters could have an effect on the distribution of P acquisition genes we computed Pearson correlations using the Hmisc R software package (Harrel et al., 2018).
Environmental variables
The environmental parameters tested included sampling depth, temperature, dissolved oxygen, silicate, inorganicnitrogen (N; includes nitrate plus nitrite) and the N to Pi (N:P) molar concentration ratio from Tara Oceans. We also included in the analysis environmental parameters from the Pelagic Interactions Scheme for Carbon and Ecosystem Studies (PISCES) v3 ocean biogeochemical model (Aumont et al., 2015) and from the World Ocean Atlas (WOA) 2009 (Garcia et al., 2010). From PISCES, we computed the monthly climatology of dissolved iron (Fe), silicate, nitrate, Pi, chlorophyll, oxygen and phytoplankton concentration matching the Tara Oceans metagenomes sampling locations with a spatial tolerance of 0.3° and a depth tolerance of 5 m. PISCES data were extracted using the Opedia software and database (Ashkesari and Berthiaume, 2018). From the WOA mean annual climatology, we obtained Pi and nitrateconcentrations matching Tara Oceans sampling locations within one degree of latitude and longitude and no more than 5 m depth for samples from the EPZ. Tara Oceans sampling stations were matched to WOA stations using the nearest neighbour search function in the RANN package for R (Arya et al., 2019). The WOA and PISCES data provided two additional independent datasets to evaluate the correlation of environmental parameters with gene abundance.
Regression models of the response of P acquisition gene abundance to phosphate
To further describe the response of P acquisition genes to Pi, we fitted linear regression models of the log‐transformed relative abundance of each reference gene normalized to the log‐transformed mean annual Pi concentration obtained from the WOA at the corresponding sampling location and depth of each Tara Oceans metagenome. We also fitted a linear regression model of the log‐transformed gene relative abundance with two predictors, ocean region and log‐transformed Pi concentration from WOA, and evaluated the significance of each predictor using the ANOVA function in the car R package. To compare the slopes of the regression lines, we computed the z statistic as the difference between the two slopes divided by the standard error of the difference between the slopes and evaluated its significance at the 0.05 level.
Phylogenetic analysis of C–P lyase
The OM‐RGC includes a taxonomic profile of its genes from the phylum to the species level. However, because many OM‐RGC sequences lack classification at various taxonomic levels we performed a phylogenetic analysis of the C–P lyase pathway protein PhnJ. We downloaded 201 reference C–P lyase (PhnJ) protein sequences available from eggNOG v4.5.1 (Huerta‐Cepas et al., 2016) and five additional reference sequences obtained from NCBI belonging to Actinobacteria genomes, and aligned them with C–P lyase sequences from the OM‐RGC and from the Station ALOHA gene catalogue (Mende et al., 2017). C–P lyase sequences in the Station ALOHA gene catalogue were identified by a BLASTN search using the OM‐RGC phnJ nucleotide sequences as queries. We also included in the analysis C–P lyase sequences identified in metagenome‐assembled genomes (MAGs) from Tara Oceans (Tully et al., 2018) to aid with the classification of OM‐RGCC–P lyase sequences. The classification of MAGs was based on a phylogenetic analysis of several single‐copy marker genes and is described in detail in Tully et al. (2018). To identify phnJ genes in these MAGs, the protein‐coding regions in the assemblies available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA391943 were downloaded and subject to a BLASTP search using the translated sequence of phnJ genes identified in the OM‐RGC. The BLASTP search provided 122 additional PhnJ reference sequences from these MAGs. A multiple sequence alignment of PhnJ was constructed using Clustal Omega with mBed‐like clustering enabled (Sievers et al., 2011). Alignment columns with >10% gaps were removed and only unique sequences were kept. The final alignment consisted of 440 unique sequences with 276 positions. The complete set of OM‐RGC and reference PhnJ sequences and the amino acid sequence alignment without trimming are available in fasta format in the Supporting Information. We then constructed a maximum likelihood tree with RAxML v8 (Stamatakis, 2014) using the Le and Gascuel (2008) amino acid substitution matrix, the gamma model of rate heterogeneity, rapid bootstrapping (500 iterations) and maximum likelihood searches. RAxML was implemented on the Cyberinfrastructure for Phylogenetic Research (CIPRES) Science Gateway (Miller et al., 2010). A conservative taxonomicclassification was assigned to each OM‐RGC sequence based on their placement in the phylogenetic tree and on the taxonomic identity of the most closely related sequence in a reference genome or MAG. An expanded version of the phylogenetic tree of PhnJ sequences can be accessed through the interactive tree of life (iTOL) website (see Supporting Information). To estimate the relative contribution of different bacterial groups to the total C–P lyase abundance in a metagenomic sample, OM‐RGC phnJ sequences with the same taxonomicclassification were grouped and their abundances summed and normalized by the total abundance of phnJ.
Taxon‐specific enrichment of C–P lyase
To calculate the percentage of organisms containing C–P lyase within a taxonomic group in each Tara Oceans sample, phnJ genes were binned based on their amino acid sequence phylogeny and their abundances summed and normalized by the mean abundance of 40 single‐copy marker genes matching each taxon bin based on the OM‐RGCclassification (Sunagawa et al., 2015). Single‐copy marker genes were identified in the OM‐RGC with the program fetchMG (Sunagawa et al., 2013) and their abundance extracted from the OM‐RGC profiles dataset.To further resolve the abundance of C–P lyase in specific populations of organisms at a finer taxonomic level, the raw reads of each Tara Oceans metagenome of the 0.22 μm size‐fraction were mapped to MAG assemblies (Tully et al., 2018) possessing C–P lyase and to the genome of Pelagibacterales sp. strain HTCC7211 (GenBank accession ABVS01000001) which alsocontains the C–P lyase pathway (Carini et al., 2014). Tara Oceans metagenomic reads were obtained from the European Molecular Biology Laboratory‐European Bioinformatics Institute and MAG assemblies (Tully et al., 2018) were downloaded from https://ndownloader.figshare.com/files/8849371. Reads were mapped against the genome assemblies using Bowtie 2 v2.2.4 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012) and coding DNA sequences were identified with Prodigal v2.6.2 (Hyatt et al., 2010). To calculate the coverage of each gene in the assemblies, we employed the Bedtools suite (v2.27.1) coverage tool (Quinlan and Hall, 2010). For each metagenomic sample, the relative abundance of each MAG was calculated by normalizing the coverage of phnJ by the mean coverage of 40 single‐copy marker genes (identified with fetchMG) and was expressed as a percentage of organisms with C–P lyase.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.Table S1. Linear regression models between gene relative abundance and mean annual phosphateconcentration data from the World Ocean Atlas.Figure S1. Maximum likelihood tree of C‐P lyase (PhnJ) protein sequences retrieved from the Ocean Microbial Reference Gene Catalog (OM‐RGC)Figure S2. Taxon‐specific enrichment of C‐P lyase across depth zones and ocean regions.Figure S3. C‐P lyase pathway phn gene operons from representative Tara Oceans metagenome assembled‐genomes (MAGs).Click here for additional data file.Appendix S1.
Tara Oceans OM‐RGC and reference sequences of C‐P lyase protein PhnJ.Click here for additional data file.Appendix S2. Clustal Omega alignment of C‐P lyase protein PhnJ.Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Daniel R Mende; Jessica A Bryant; Frank O Aylward; John M Eppley; Torben Nielsen; David M Karl; Edward F DeLong Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2017-08-14 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: Benjamin A S Van Mooy; Helen F Fredricks; Byron E Pedler; Sonya T Dyhrman; David M Karl; Michal Koblízek; Michael W Lomas; Tracy J Mincer; Lisa R Moore; Thierry Moutin; Michael S Rappé; Eric A Webb Journal: Nature Date: 2009-03-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Paul Carini; Benjamin A S Van Mooy; J Cameron Thrash; Angelicque White; Yanlin Zhao; Emily O Campbell; Helen F Fredricks; Stephen J Giovannoni Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-06-08 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Connor R Love; Eleanor C Arrington; Kelsey M Gosselin; Christopher M Reddy; Benjamin A S Van Mooy; Robert K Nelson; David L Valentine Journal: Nat Microbiol Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 17.745
Authors: M C Muñoz-Marín; G Gómez-Baena; A López-Lozano; J A Moreno-Cabezuelo; J Díez; J M García-Fernández Journal: ISME J Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Marianne Acker; Shane L Hogle; Paul M Berube; Thomas Hackl; Allison Coe; Ramunas Stepanauskas; Sallie W Chisholm; Daniel J Repeta Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Angela M Oliverio; Andrew Bissett; Krista McGuire; Kristin Saltonstall; Benjamin L Turner; Noah Fierer Journal: mBio Date: 2020-10-27 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Andrew R J Murphy; David J Scanlan; Yin Chen; Nathan B P Adams; William A Cadman; Andrew Bottrill; Gary Bending; John P Hammond; Andrew Hitchcock; Elizabeth M H Wellington; Ian D E A Lidbury Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-07-27 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jinglie Zhou; Susanna M Theroux; Clifton P Bueno de Mesquita; Wyatt H Hartman; Ye Tian; Susannah G Tringe Journal: ISME J Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 10.302