| Literature DB >> 30972313 |
Hongping Li1, Zhijiang He2, Di Gao1, Yuanhong Lv1, Queyun Zhou1, Bin Xiao1, Weimin Huang1.
Abstract
Objective: Very low birth weight (VLBW) infants, which experience significant postnatal growth restriction at the time of discharge, are at high risk of later growth failure and long-term consequences. This study aims to characterize the structure of intestinal microbiome community in VLBW infants with extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR).Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA sequencing; extrauterine growth restriction; gut microbiome; neonatal intensive care unit; preterm infants; very low birth weight
Year: 2019 PMID: 30972313 PMCID: PMC6443964 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups.
| Gestational age, weeks (mean, SD) | 28.9 (1.8) | 29.2 (1.9) | 28.5 (1.7) | 0.31 |
| Maternal age, years (mean, SD) | 28.7 (5.1) | 28.6 (5.7) | 28.7 (4.5) | 0.95 |
| Birth weight, grams (mean, SD) | 1,187 (212) | 1,187 (217) | 1,188 (216) | 0.99 |
| Male | 18 (78.3%) | 9 (75%) | 9 (81.8%) | 1 |
| Antenatal medications | ||||
| Antibiotic | 9 (39.1%) | 5 (41.7%) | 4 (36.4%) | 1 |
| Magnesium sulfate | 18 (78.3%) | 7 (58.3%) | 11 (100%) | 0.06 |
| Dexamethasone | 21 (91.3%) | 11 (91.7%) | 10 (90.9%) | 1 |
| Vaginal birth | 12 (52.2%) | 7 (58.3%) | 5 (45.5%) | 0.84 |
| Multiple birth | 7 (30.4%) | 4 (33.3%) | 3 (27.3%) | 1 |
| Chorioamnionitis | 13 (56.5%) | 5 (41.7%) | 8 (72.7%) | 0.28 |
| Small for gestational age | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Amino acid supplement | 22 (95.7%) | 12 (100%) | 10 (90.9%) | 0.96 |
| Respiratory distress syndrome | 10 (43.5%) | 4 (33.3%) | 6 (54.5%) | 0.55 |
| Patent ductus arteriosus | 8 (34.8%) | 6 (50%) | 2 (18.2%) | 0.25 |
| Postnatal age, weeks (mean, SD) | 37.2 (2.0) | 37.6 (2.1) | 36.7 (1.9) | 0.28 |
| Postnatal treatment with steroids | 3 (13.0%) | 1 (8.3%) | 2 (18.2%) | 0.94 |
| Bronchopulmonory dysplasia | 13 (56.5%) | 6 (50%) | 7 (63.6%) | 0.81 |
| Treated retinopathy of prematurity | 5 (21.7%) | 3 (25%) | 2 (18.2%) | 1 |
| Necrotizing enterocolitis | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Surgical necrotizing enterocolitis | 1 (4.3%) | 1 (8.3%) | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Postnatal antibiotics exposure in the first week | 18 (78.3%) | 10 (83.3%) | 8 (72.7%) | 0.91 |
| Postnatal antibiotics exposure after the first week | 14 (60.9%) | 7 (58.3%) | 7 (63.6%) | 1 |
| Days on antibiotics during hospitalization (mean, SD) | 14.5 (10.5) | 16.3 (13.5) | 12.4 (6.0) | 0.44 |
| Early onset infection | 14 (60.9%) | 8 (66.7%) | 6 (54.5%) | 0.87 |
| Late onset infection | 10 (43.5%) | 6 (50%) | 4 (36.4%) | 0.81 |
| Packed red blood cell transfusion | 20 (87.0%) | 9 (75%) | 11 (100%) | 0.25 |
| Feeding type | 0.24 | |||
| Maternal breast milk only | 5 (21.7%) | 1 (8.3%) | 4 (36.4%) | |
| Formula only | 8 (34.8%) | 5 (41.7%) | 3 (27.3%) | |
| Mixed feeding types | 10 (43.5%) | 6 (50%) | 4 (36.4%) | |
| Feeding intolerance in post-natal 2 weeks | 11 (47.8%) | 7 (58.3%) | 4 (36.4%) | 0.52 |
| Length of stay, days (mean, SD) | 58.4 (21.6) | 58.9 (24.1) | 57.7 (19.7) | 0.90 |
| Postmentrual age, weeks (mean, SD) | 37.3 (1.8) | 37.8 (1.9) | 36.7 (1.6) | 0.16 |
| z-score for weight at discharge | −1.5 (0.65) | −2.0 (0.5) | −1.0 (0.1) | <0.01 |
Figure 1Overall structures of intestinal microbiota at the phylum level. (A) Average microbiome community of group EUGR and AGA. (B) Microbiome community structure of each sample at d1. (C) Microbiome community structure of each sample at d28. (D) Differences of phylum between EUGRd1 and AGAd1 group. (E) Differences of phylum between EUGRd28 and AGAd28 group.
Figure 2Principal coordinate analysis and alpha diversity plots in intestinal microbiota. (A) Weighted UniFrac PCoA plot based on OTU abundance. Each point represents the intestinal microbiota of a newborn in the EUGR group (red) and AGA group (green). (B) Comparison of the microbiome biodiversity between infants with EUGR and normal growth, the Shannon index, Simpson index were shown as estimators.
Figure 3Histogram of the LDA scored for differentially abundant genera between EUGR and AGA groups (red: AGA; green: EUGR). LDA scores were calculated by LDA effect size using linear discriminant analysis. (A) was d1, and (B) was d28.
Figure 4Differently abundant pathways between EUGR and AGA groups and its relationship with varying abundances of genera. (A) Functional properties that differed significantly between EUGRd28 and AGAd28 groups. (B) Relationships among bacteria, functional genes, and metabolic pathways.