| Literature DB >> 30971740 |
Anupam Mittal1,2, Santanu Rana3, Rajni Sharma4, Akhilesh Kumar4, Rishikesh Prasad4, Satish K Raut4, Sagartirtha Sarkar3, Uma Nahar Saikia5, Ajay Bahl2, Perundurai S Dhandapany6,7,8,9, Madhu Khullar10.
Abstract
Cardiorenal syndrome is defined by primary heart failure conditions influencing or leading to renal injury or dysfunction. Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major co-existing form of heart failure (HF) with renal diseases. Myocardin (MYOCD), a cardiac-specific co-activator of serum response factor (SRF), is increased in DCM porcine and patient cardiac tissues and plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of DCM. Inhibiting the increased MYOCD has shown to be partially rescuing the DCM phenotype in porcine model. However, expression levels of MYOCD in the cardiac tissues of the cardiorenal syndromic patients and the effect of inhibiting MYOCD in a cardiorenal syndrome model remains to be explored. Here, we analyzed the expression levels of MYOCD in the DCM patients with and without renal diseases. We also explored, whether cardiac specific silencing of MYOCD expression could ameliorate the cardiac remodeling and improve cardiac function in a renal artery ligated rat model (RAL). We observed an increase in MYOCD levels in the endomyocardial biopsies of DCM patients associated with renal failure compared to DCM alone. Silencing of MYOCD in RAL rats by a cardiac homing peptide conjugated MYOCD siRNA resulted in attenuation of cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis and restoration of the left ventricular functions. Our data suggest hyper-activation of MYOCD in the pathogenesis of the cardiorenal failure cases. Also, MYOCD silencing showed beneficial effects by rescuing cardiac hypertrophy, fibrosis, size and function in a cardiorenal rat model.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30971740 PMCID: PMC6458122 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42009-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Myocardin (MYOCD) mRNA and protein expression in myocardial tissues of DCM patients with and without renal failure and controls. (a) Quantitative mRNA expression of MYOCD in DCM cardiac tissues (n = 30) with and without renal failure and control group (n = 15) as determined by qRT-PCR using Taqman probe chemistry. (b) Representative western blot for MYOCD and GAPDH proteins in control (C1–C4) and DCM patients (P1–P5) in LV myocardium samples. Semi-Quantitative protein expression of MYOCD in DCM patients and controls as estimated by software ImageJ. Normalization of total RNA and protein was done using GAPDH as an internal control. Data given is Mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05 Control vs DCM; ***p < 0.001 Control vs DCM or DCM with cardio-renal syndrome.
Figure 2MYOCD siRNA treatment on expression of hypertrophic genes and fibrotic genes in H9c2 and cardiac fibroblast respectively. (a) mRNA expression of ANP, Beta myosin heavy chain (β-MHC) and MYOCD after treatment with MYOCD siRNA in Ang II treated H9c2 cells. (b) ANP and MYOCD protein expression after treatment with MYOCD siRNA in Ang II treated H9c2 cells. (c) mRNA expression of MYOCD expression after treatment with MYOCD siRNA in cardiac fibroblast cells. (d) mRNA expression of fibrotic gene (Col1a, Col3a, Col4a, CTGF, TGF β and FGF β) after treatment with MYOCD siRNA in Ang-II treated fibroblast cells. Normalization of total RNA and protein was done by using GAPDH as an internal control. Data given is Mean ± SEM of triplicates; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001Control vs Ang II and Ang II vs Ang II + MYOCD siRNA.
Figure 3Effect of MYOCD siRNA treatment on expression of hypertrophic genes (ANP and β-MHC) and on cardiomyocyte size in RAL rats (n = 8). (a) mRNA expression of MYOCD, ANP and β-MHC in RAL and MYOCD siRNA treated RAL rats. (b) Representative western blot for MYOCD, ANP and GAPDH proteins in RAL and MYOCD siRNA treated RAL rats (before and after ligation). (c) Haematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) stained photomicrographs (10X) of rat hearts: (I) Control group, (II) RAL group (III) Scrambled treated RAL group IV) MYOCD siRNA treated (before ligation) RAL Group V) MYOCD siRNA treated (after ligation) RAL group. Bar diagram shows mean of cardiomyocyte area (n = 50) as measured by Image J analyser. Normalization of total RNA and protein was done using GAPDH as an internal control. Data given is Mean ± SEM; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 for Control vs RAL or scrambled; ##p < 0.01 for RAL or Scrambled vs RAL treated with MYOCD siRNA before ligation (Pre-ligation); $p < 0.05, $$p < 0.01 $$$p < 0.001 for RAL or Scrambled vs RAL treated with MYOCD siRNA after ligation (Post-Ligation).
Echocardiographic parameters and heart weight (HW) to body weight (BW) ratio in RAL model treated with myocd siRNA.
| Treatment Groups | LVDD (mm) | FS (%) | LVEF (%) | HW/BW ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I (Sham Controls) | 4.34 ± 0.20 | 62.08 ± 1.18 | 78 ± 8.8 | 3.2 ± 0.5 |
| Group II (Ligated) | 5.83 ± 0.38* | 34.6 ± 3.8* | 55 ± 6.7* | 4.6 ± 0.7* |
| Group III (Ligated + post-myocd siRNA) | 4.95 ± 0.67# | 56.8 ± 1.97# | 72 ± 5.9# | 3.95 ± 0.3# |
| Group IV (Ligated + pre-myocd siRNA) | 5.05 ± 0.45$ | 50.6 ± 2.85$ | 61 ± 7.2$ | 3.7 ± 0.4$ |
| Group V (Ligated + scrambled siRNA) | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 38 ± 2.4 | 52 ± 4.4 | 4.7 ± 0.5 |
LVDD: Left Ventricular Diastolic Diameter; FS: Fraction Shortening; LVEF: Left Ventricular ejection fraction. *p < 0.05 Group I vs Group II or V; #p < 0.05 Group II or V vs Group III; $p < 0.05 Group II or V vs Group IV.
Figure 4Effect of MYOCD siRNA treatment on expression of fibrotic genes (Col 1a, Col 3a, Col 4a, TGF β, CTGF and FGF β) in RAL rats (n = 8). (a) mRNA expression of Col 1a, Col 3a, Col 4a, TGF β, CTGF and FGF β in RAL rats. (b) Representative western blot for CTGF, FGF and GAPDH proteins in RAL rats. (c) mRNA expression of Col 1a, Col 3a, Col 4a, TGF β, CTGF and FGF β in MYOCD siRNA treated RAL rats (before and after ligation). (d) Representative western blot for CTGF, FGF and GAPDH proteins in MYOCD siRNA treated RAL rats (before and after ligation). (e) Photomicrographs (10X) of rat heart tissues with Masson’s Trichrome staining which is collagen specific and evaluates fibrosis: (I) control, (II) RAL rats with extensive collagen deposition (III) Scrambled treated RAL group III) MYOCD siRNA (before ligation) treated RAL rats show decreased collagen deposition (IV) MYOCD siRNA (after ligation) treated RAL rats show decreased collagen deposition. Normalization of RNA and protein was done using GAPDH as an internal control. Data given is Mean ± SEM; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 for Control vs RAL or scrambled; #p < 0.05; ##p < 0.01 for RAL or scrambled vs RAL treated with MYOCD siRNA before ligation; $p < 0.05; $$p < 0.01 for RAL or scrambled vs RAL treated with MYOCD siRNA after ligation.