| Literature DB >> 30971032 |
Buong Woei Chieng1,2, Syn Huey Lee3, Nor Azowa Ibrahim4,5, Yoon Yee Then6, Yuet Ying Loo7.
Abstract
The aim was to explore the utilization of oil palm mesocarp fiber (OPMF) as a source for the production of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). OPMF was first treated with alkali and then bleached before the production of CNC by acid hydrolysis (H₂SO₄). The produced materials were characterized using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and a transmission electron microscope (TEM). It was proven that acid hydrolysis can increase the crystallinity of bleached OPMF and reduce the dimension of cellulose to nano scale. Changes in the peaks of the FTIR spectrum at 2852 (C-H stretching), 1732 (C=O stretching) and 1234 cm-1 (C-O stretching) indicated that the alkali treatment completely removed hemicelluloses and lignin from the fiber surface. This can be seen from the thermogram obtained from the TGA characterization. Morphological characterization clearly showed the formation of rod-shaped CNCs. The promising results prove that OPMF is a valuable source for the production of CNC.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose; mesocarp fiber; oil palm
Year: 2017 PMID: 30971032 PMCID: PMC6418664 DOI: 10.3390/polym9080355
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Chemical composition of oil palm mesocarp fiber (OPMF) and treated OPMF.
| OPMF | Treated OPMF | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 32.22 ± 1.54 | 81.11 ± 0.45 |
|
| 31.62 ± 0.46 | 12.65 ± 0.14 |
|
| 23.89 ± 1.12 | 5.09 ± 1.23 |
Figure 1Photographs of (a) OPMF, (b) alkaline treated OPMF and (c) bleached OPMF.
Figure 2Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra of (a) OPMF, (b) alkaline treated OPMF, (c) bleached OPMF and, (d) cellulose nanocrystals (CNC).
Figure 3XRD curves of (a) OPMF, (b) alkaline treated OPMF, (c) bleached OPMF and, (d) CNC.
Crystallinity index (%) of OPMF, alkaline treated OPMF, bleached OPMF and CNC.
| Samples | 2θ (Amorphous) (°) | 2θ (002) (°) | CrI (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree | Intensity ( | Degree | Intensity ( | ||
| OPMF | 18.76 | 298 | 21.58 | 538 | 44.61 |
| Alkaline treated OPMF | 18.44 | 214 | 22.28 | 612 | 65.03 |
| Bleached OPMF | 18.96 | 198 | 22.36 | 786 | 74.81 |
| CNC | 18.58 | 190 | 22.46 | 856 | 77.80 |
Figure 4Thermogravimetric (TG) thermograms of (a) OPMF, (b) alkaline treated OPMF, (c) bleached OPMF and (d) CNC.
Figure 5Derivative thermogravimetric (DTG) thermograms of (a) OPMF, (b) alkaline treated OPMF, (c) bleached OPMF and (d) CNC.
Figure 6SEM micrographs of (a) OPMF, (b) alkaline treated OPMF and (c) bleached OPMF.
Figure 7TEM micrograph of CNC extracted from OPMF.