| Literature DB >> 30970865 |
Shujahadeen B Aziz1, Omed Gh Abdullah2, Mariwan A Rasheed3, Hameed M Ahmed4.
Abstract
Chitosan (CS) films doped with sodium triflate (NaTf) were prepared by the solution cast technique. The structural and morphological behaviors of the samples were examined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) techniques. The XRD patterns were deconvoluted to estimate the degree of crystallinity of the samples. The SEM micrograph showed the crystalline structure of the sample contained 50 wt % of NaTf salt. The disappearance of broad peaks of chitosan at 2θ ≈ 21° and 2θ ≈ 32° confirmed the occurrence of ion association at 50 wt % of NaTf salt. In impedance plots, a low frequency spike region and a high frequency semicircle, were distinguishable for low salt concentrations. The highest ambient temperature direct current (DC) electrical conductivity obtained for CS:NaTf was found to be 2.41 × 10-⁴ S/cm for the sample containing 40 wt % of NaTf salt. The role of lattice energy of salts on DC ionic conductivity was also discussed. The temperature dependence of DC conductivity was found to follow the well-known Arrhenius relationship. From the alternating current (AC) conductivity spectra, three distinct regions were recognized for the samples with NaTf salt concentration ranging from 10 wt % to 30 wt %. The plateau region of AC spectra was used to estimate the DC conductivity.Entities:
Keywords: DC and AC conductivity; SEM; chitosan polymer electrolyte; degree of crystallinity; impedance plots
Year: 2017 PMID: 30970865 PMCID: PMC6431943 DOI: 10.3390/polym9060187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Composition of chitosan:NaTf based solid polymer electrolytes.
| Sample designation | Chitosan (g) | NaTf (wt %) | NaTf (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| HSCP 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| HSCP 1 | 1 | 10 | 0.11 |
| HSCP 2 | 1 | 20 | 0.25 |
| HSCP 3 | 1 | 30 | 0.42 |
| HSCP 4 | 1 | 40 | 0.66 |
| HSCP 5 | 1 | 50 | 1 |
Figure 1X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern of pure NaTf salt.
Figure 2Gaussian fitting of XRD for (a) HSCP0; (b) HSCP1; (c) HSCP2; (d) HSCP3; (e) HSCP4 and (f) HSCP5.
Degree of crystallinity (X) for all the samples.
| Sample designation | Degree of crystallinity ( |
|---|---|
| HSCP 0 | 15.1 |
| HSCP 1 | 13.4 |
| HSCP 2 | 9.7 |
| HSCP 3 | 7.2 |
| HSCP 4 | 1.97 |
| HSCP 5 | - |
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image for (a) HSCP 4 and; (b) HSCP 5.
Figure 4Nyquist plots for (a) HSCP 0; (b) HSCP 1; (c) HSCP 2; (d) HSCP 3; (e) HSCP 4 and (f) HSCP 5.
DC ionic conductivity of pure chitosan and chitosan:NaTf complexes at 30 °C.
| Sample designation | DC conductivity (S/cm) |
|---|---|
| HSCP0 | 1.65 × 10−10 |
| HSCP1 | 4.78 × 10−9 |
| HSCP2 | 5.84 × 10−7 |
| HSCP3 | 8.53 × 10−6 |
| HSCP4 | 2.41 × 10−4 |
| HSCP5 | 7.34 × 10−7 |
Figure 5Temperature dependence of DC ionic conductivity for all samples.
Figure 6Variation of activation energy (E) with salt concentration.
Figure 7AC conductivity spectra for (a) HSCP 1; (b) HSCP 2; (c) HSCP 3; (d) HSCP 4 and (e) HSCP 5.