| Literature DB >> 30970550 |
Rizwan Khan1, Muhammad Ali Inam2, Sarfaraz Khan3, Andrea Navarro Jiménez4, Du Ri Park5, Ick Tae Yeom6.
Abstract
The widespread use of copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) and surfactants in various consumer products makes it likely that they coexist in aqueous environments, making it important to study the effects of surfactants on the fate and transport behavior of CuO NPs. The present study aims to investigate the influence of anionic sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and nonionic nonylphenol ethoxylate (NPEO, Tergitol NP-9), on CuO NPs adsorption, aggregation, and removal from water by the coagulation process. The result of the sorption study indicates that both surfactants could be adsorbed on the surface of CuO NPs, and that SLS remarkably decreases the ζ potential as well as the hydrodynamic diameter (HDD) of CuO as compared to NP-9. The kinetic aggregation study showed that both SLS and NP-9 reduced the HDD of CuO NPs and retarded the settling rates at surfactant concentrations above 0.015% (w:v) over a 24 h-period. Moreover, enhanced aggregation of CuO NPs was observed in two environmental waters as compared to pure water, which could be related to their high ionic strength. The addition of surfactants in natural waters has been shown to reduce the aggregation and sedimentation of CuO; however, the reductive effect of SLS was more pronounced than that of NP-9. Finally, the coagulation results showed that the removal efficiencies of CuO, Cu2+, and the surfactant in all tested waters at optimum ferric chloride dosage reached around 98, 95, and 85%, respectively. Furthermore, the coagulation mechanism revealed that the combination of charge neutralization and adsorptive micellar flocculation (AMF) might be involved in the removal of both pollutants. The results of the present study provide new insight into the environmental behavior of coexisting NPs and surfactants in wastewater treatment processes.Entities:
Keywords: CuO nanoparticles; adsorption; aggregation; chemical coagulation; surfactants; wastewater treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30970550 PMCID: PMC6479800 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16071260
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Characteristics of synthetic and environmental waters.
| Surfactant | Conc.: (w:v) % | Water Code | pH | CuO NP (mg/L) | Released Cu2+ (mg/L) | HDD (nm) | ζ Potential (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | Control | 7.02 ± 0.01 | 8.74 ± 0.41 | 0.989 ± 0.12 | 225 ± 38 | 12.5 ± 2.5 |
| SLS | 0.030 | Tap water | 6.91 ± 0.03 | 8.65 ± 0.11 | 0.995 ± 0.23 | 257 ± 60 | −15.5±1.1 |
| Freshwater | 6.83 ± 0.14 | 7.87 ± 0.43 | 1.103 ± 0.13 | 205 ± 84 | −19.1 ± 0.9 | ||
| Domestic Wastewater | 7.16 ± 0.25 | 6.19 ± 0.13 | 2.029 ± 0.07 | 235 ± 68 | −23.8 ± 0.5 | ||
| Industrial Wastewater | 7.67 ± 0.31 | 5.17 ± 0.06 | 3.184 ± 0.01 | 185 ± 48 | −32.3 ± 0.2 | ||
| NP-9 | 0.030 | Tap water | 6.95 ± 0.21 | 8.05 ± 0.14 | 0.784 ± 0.28 | 265 ± 55 | 11.9 ± 0.5 |
| Freshwater | 6.82 ± 0.01 | 8.26 ± 0.08 | 0.996 ± 0.30 | 314 ± 35 | −5.6 ± 0.1 | ||
| Domestic Wastewater | 7.36 ± 0.14 | 6.09 ± 0.08 | 2.719 ± 0.02 | 245 ± 67 | −13.8 ± 0.3 | ||
| Industrial Wastewater | 6.75 ± 0.11 | 7.16 ± 0.01 | 2.769 ± 0.03 | 205 ± 65 | −24.8 ± 0.2 |
NP: nanoparticles. HDD: hydrodynamic diameter. Conc. Concentrations.
Figure 1Characterization: (A) FT-IR; (B) XRD; (C) XPS survey spectrum; and (D) Raman survey spectrum of CuO powder.
Figure 2Isotherm modeling (0–100 mg/L) of SLS and NP-9 surfactants onto CuO NPs (50 mg/L) at pH 7.
Langmuir and Freundlich fitting parameters for SLS and NP-9 adsorption onto CuO NPs.
| Langmuir Fitting | Freundlich Fitting | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Surfactant |
|
| R2 | |||
|
| 0.017 ± 0.003 | 48.84 ± 4.42 | 0.993 | 1.367 ± 0.42 | 1.482 ± 0.17 | 0.973 |
|
| 0.041 ± 0.010 | 7.17 ± 0.53 | 0.984 | 0.747 ± 0.25 | 2.185 ± 0.40 | 0.934 |
Figure 3Effects of surfactants concentration (0–0.030%) on the (A) ζ potential; (B) hydrodynamic diameter of CuO NPs suspension at pH (7.0 ± 0.1).
Figure 4Effects of surfactants concentration (0–0.030%) on the aggregation rate of CuO NPs in the presence of (A) SLS; (B) NP-9; and FT-IR spectra showing (C) pristine surfactants and; (D) CuO-surfactants complex.
Figure 5Effect of surfactants concentration (0–0.030%) on HDD of CuO NPs as a function of (A) pH; (B) KCl; and (C) MgCl2.
Figure 6Effects of SLS/NP-9 concentration (0.015 and 0.030%) on the aggregation of CuO NPs in (A) tap water; (B) fresh water; (C) domestic wastewater; and (D) industrial wastewater.
Figure 7Removal of CuO NPs, Cu2+, surfactant, from environmental waters (A–H), as a function of FC coagulant dosage with corresponding ζ potential.