Literature DB >> 30970158

No selection for change in polyandry under experimental evolution.

Andreas Sutter1,2, Laura M Travers1,2, Melanie Weedon1, Keiko Oku1, Thomas A R Price3, Nina Wedell1.   

Abstract

What drives mating system variation is a major question in evolutionary biology. Female multiple mating (polyandry) has diverse evolutionary consequences, and there are many potential benefits and costs of polyandry. However, our understanding of its evolution is biased towards studies enforcing monandry in polyandrous species. What drives and maintains variation in polyandry between individuals, genotypes, populations and species remains poorly understood. Genetic variation in polyandry may be actively maintained by selection, or arise by chance if polyandry is selectively neutral. In Drosophila pseudoobscura, there is genetic variation in polyandry between and within populations. We used isofemale lines to found replicate populations with high or low initial levels of polyandry and tracked polyandry under experimental evolution over seven generations. Polyandry remained relatively stable, reflecting the starting frequencies of the experimental populations. There were no clear fitness differences between high versus low polyandry genotypes, and there was no signature of balancing selection. We confirmed these patterns in direct comparisons between evolved and ancestral females and found no consequences of polyandry for female fecundity. The absence of differential selection even when initiating populations with major differences in polyandry casts some doubt on the importance of polyandry for female fitness.
© 2019 European Society For Evolutionary Biology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2019 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Drosophila pseudoobscurazzm321990; balancing selection; directional selection; genetic variation; isofemale lines; monandry; multiple mating

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30970158     DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  4 in total

1.  X-linked meiotic drive can boost population size and persistence.

Authors:  Carl Mackintosh; Andrew Pomiankowski; Michael F Scott
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Ancient gene drives: an evolutionary paradox.

Authors:  T A R Price; R Verspoor; N Wedell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Pool-GWAS on reproductive dormancy in Drosophila simulans suggests a polygenic architecture.

Authors:  Manolis Lirakis; Viola Nolte; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.542

4.  Enforced monoandry over generations induces a reduction of female investment into reproduction in a promiscuous bird.

Authors:  Gabriele Sorci; Loïc Lesobre; Pauline Vuarin; Gwènaëlle Levêque; Michel Saint Jalme; Frédéric Lacroix; Yves Hingrat
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 5.183

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.