Literature DB >> 30969461

Keratinocytes are mechanoresponsive to the microflow-induced shear stress.

Tarun Agarwal1,2, Gautham H Narayana1,3, Indranil Banerjee1.   

Abstract

Here, we have reported that keratinocytes respond to the microflow-induced shear stress both at the collective and individual cell level. Using a microfluidic setup, we categorically showed that low shear stress of magnitude 0.06 dyne/cm2 could induce morphological variation and cytoskeletal reorganization in keratinocyte, whereas higher shear stress (6 dyne/cm2 ) resulted in cellular disruption. Using a series of blocker molecules specific to different mechanotransducers, we demonstrated the pivotal role of actin network in keratinocyte mechanoresponsiveness in conjugation with myosin and lipid rafts. Flow-induced shear stress also induced significant elevation in E-cadherin and Zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) expression levels. We further showed that under the influence of shear stress, the extent of colocalization of E-cadherin and ZO-1 was more at the cell-cell junction that indicates an improvement in the epithelial phenotype. An increase in the expression of nuclear lamin was also observed in the sheared cells that suggest the transmission of mechanical signals to the nucleus. It is envisioned that this study may find its application in basic and applied organogenesis of the epidermis.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  flow-induced shear stress; keratinocytes; mechanotransduction; microfluidics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30969461     DOI: 10.1002/cm.21521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytoskeleton (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1949-3592


  4 in total

Review 1.  Biotensegrity or Fascintegrity?

Authors:  Bruno Bordoni; Matthew A Varacallo; Bruno Morabito; Marta Simonelli
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-06-03

Review 2.  Modeling an Optimal 3D Skin-on-Chip within Microfluidic Devices for Pharmacological Studies.

Authors:  Estibaliz Fernandez-Carro; Maricke Angenent; Tamara Gracia-Cazaña; Yolanda Gilaberte; Clara Alcaine; Jesús Ciriza
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 3.  Development of Skin-On-A-Chip Platforms for Different Utilizations: Factors to Be Considered.

Authors:  J Ponmozhi; S Dhinakaran; Zsófia Varga-Medveczky; Katalin Fónagy; Luca Anna Bors; Kristóf Iván; Franciska Erdő
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 4.  Skin-on-a-Chip Technology: Microengineering Physiologically Relevant In Vitro Skin Models.

Authors:  Patrícia Zoio; Abel Oliva
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 6.321

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.