| Literature DB >> 30967684 |
Vishesh Dubey1,2, Daria Popova3, Azeem Ahmad1,2, Ganesh Acharya3,4, Purusotam Basnet3, Dalip Singh Mehta1, Balpreet Singh Ahluwalia5.
Abstract
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30967684 PMCID: PMC6456572 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42490-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Measurement of the spatial phase sensitivity of QPM for direct laser and pseudo-thermal light sources. (a,d) are the interferograms obtained with healthy sperm cell as a test specimen, (b,e) reconstructed phase map of the sperm cell corresponding to (a,d), respectively and (c,f) spatial phase noise of the experimental setup for laser and pseudo-thermal light sources, respectively. Note that the scale of the color bars used in (c,f) having different values.
Figure 2Effects of the H2O2 on the motility of sperm cells (a) changes in the percentage of progressive motility and (b) non-progressive motility of sperm cells after H2O2 treatment at different concentrations comparing to control (mean ± SE, p < 0.05 vs. control).