Literature DB >> 30967618

Exome sequencing identifies germline variants in DIS3 in familial multiple myeloma.

Maroulio Pertesi1,2, Maxime Vallée1, Xiaomu Wei3, Maria V Revuelta4, Perrine Galia5,6, Delphine Demangel5,6, Javier Oliver1,7, Matthieu Foll1, Siwei Chen3, Emeline Perrial8,9, Laurent Garderet10,11,12, Jill Corre13, Xavier Leleu14, Eileen M Boyle15, Olivier Decaux16,17,18, Philippe Rodon19, Brigitte Kolb20, Borhane Slama21, Philippe Mineur22, Eric Voog23, Catherine Le Bris24, Jean Fontan25, Michel Maigre26, Marie Beaumont27, Isabelle Azais28, Hagay Sobol29, Marguerite Vignon30, Bruno Royer30, Aurore Perrot31, Jean-Gabriel Fuzibet32, Véronique Dorvaux33, Bruno Anglaret34, Pascale Cony-Makhoul35, Christian Berthou36, Florence Desquesnes37, Brigitte Pegourie38, Serge Leyvraz39, Laurent Mosser40, Nicole Frenkiel41, Karine Augeul-Meunier42, Isabelle Leduc43, Cécile Leyronnas44, Laurent Voillat45, Philippe Casassus46, Claire Mathiot47, Nathalie Cheron48, Etienne Paubelle49, Philippe Moreau50, Yves-Jean Bignon51, Bertrand Joly52, Pascal Bourquard53, Denis Caillot54, Hervé Naman55, Sophie Rigaudeau56, Gérald Marit57, Margaret Macro58, Isabelle Lambrecht59, Manuel Cliquennois60, Laure Vincent61, Philippe Helias62, Hervé Avet-Loiseau63, Victor Moreno64,65, Rui Manuel Reis66,67, Judit Varkonyi68, Marcin Kruszewski69, Annette Juul Vangsted70, Artur Jurczyszyn71, Jan Maciej Zaucha72, Juan Sainz73, Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis74, Marzena Wątek75,76, Matteo Pelosini77, Elzbieta Iskierka-Jażdżewska78, Norbert Grząśko79, Joaquin Martinez-Lopez80, Andrés Jerez81, Daniele Campa82, Gabriele Buda76, Fabienne Lesueur83, Marek Dudziński84, Ramón García-Sanz85, Arnon Nagler86, Marcin Rymko87, Krzysztof Jamroziak75, Aleksandra Butrym88, Federico Canzian89, Ofure Obazee89, Björn Nilsson2, Robert J Klein90, Steven M Lipkin4, James D McKay91, Charles Dumontet92,93,94,95.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30967618      PMCID: PMC6756025          DOI: 10.1038/s41375-019-0452-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leukemia        ISSN: 0887-6924            Impact factor:   11.528


× No keyword cloud information.

To the Editor

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the third most common hematological malignancy, after Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Leukemia. MM is generally preceded by Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) [1], and epidemiological studies have identified older age, male gender, family history, and MGUS as risk factors for developing MM [2]. The somatic mutational landscape of sporadic MM has been increasingly investigated, aiming to identify recurrent genetic events involved in myelomagenesis. Whole exome and whole genome sequencing studies have shown that MM is a genetically heterogeneous disease that evolves through accumulation of both clonal and subclonal driver mutations [3] and identified recurrently somatically mutated genes, including KRAS, NRAS, FAM46C, TP53, DIS3, BRAF, TRAF3, CYLD, RB1 and PRDM1 [3-5]. Despite the fact that family-based studies have provided data consistent with an inherited genetic susceptibility to MM compatible with Mendelian transmission [6], the molecular basis of inherited MM predisposition is only partly understood. Genome-Wide Association (GWAS) studies have identified and validated 23 loci significantly associated with an increased risk of developing MM that explain ~16% of heritability [7] and only a subset of familial cases are thought to have a polygenic background [8]. Recent studies have identified rare germline variants predisposing to MM in KDM1A [9], ARID1A and USP45 [10], and the implementation of next-generation sequencing technology will allow the characterization of more such rare variants. In this study, we sought to explore the involvement of rare germline genetic variants in susceptibility to MM. Within our discovery cohort of peripheral blood samples (see Supplementary Methods) from 66 individuals from 23 unrelated families analyzed by WES, DIS3 (NM_014953) was the only gene in which putative loss-of-function variants were observed in at least two families. An additional cohort of 937 individuals (148 MM, 139 MGUS, 642 unaffected relatives and eight individuals with another hematological condition) from 154 unrelated families (including the individuals in the discovery cohort) were screened for germline variants in DIS3 using targeted sequencing (Supplementary Table S1). In total, we detected DIS3 germline putative loss-of-function variants in four unrelated families. The DIS3 genotypes for the identified variants were concordant between WES and targeted sequencing (where available) and independently confirmed by Sanger sequencing on DNA extracted from uncultured whole blood. The variant allele frequencies (VAF) were close to 50%, as expected of a germline variant (Supplementary figure S1). The DIS3 gene, located in 13q22.1, encodes for the catalytic subunit of the human exosome complex, and is recurrently somatically mutated in MM patients [4, 5, 11, 12]. The somatic variants are predominantly missense variants localized in the RNB domain mainly abolishing the exoribonucleolytic activity [4, 13], and are often accompanied by LOH or biallelic inactivation due to 13q14 deletion, implying a tumor suppressor role for DIS3 in MM [5, 12, 13]. The first DIS3 variant, observed in 2 affected siblings (1 MGUS and 1 MM case) from family B (Fig. 1a), was located in the splice donor site of exon 13 (c.1755+1G>T; chr13: 73,345,041; GRCh37/hg19, rs769194741) (Supplementary Figure S1a). It is predicted to abolish the splice donor site and cause skipping of exon 13, introducing a premature termination codon (p.Arg557Argfs*3) and result in a truncated DIS3 protein that lacks part of the exonucleolytic active RNB and S1 domains (Fig. 1b, c). The presence of this variant in two siblings, implying Mendelian segregation, is consistent with a germline, rather than somatic, origin. We investigated whether a DIS3 transcript from the variant allele is generated but is subsequently eliminated by Nonsense Mediated Decay (NMD) by incubating Lymphoblastoid Cell Lines (LCLs) derived from the two c.1755+1G>T allele carriers with and without puromycin, which suppresses NMD. The mRNA transcript corresponding to the variant allele was clearly present in LCLs treated with puromycin in both carriers, whereas not detectable in untreated LCLs (Fig. 2a), consistent with the variant allele being transcribed but subsequently degraded via the NMD pathway. In line with this observation, analysis of DIS3 mRNA expression by qRT-PCR showed an average 50% reduced expression in the c.1755+1G>T carriers (range 40.7−61.4%) as compared to non-carriers (Fig. 2b). A second splicing variant (c.1883+1G>C; chr13: 73,342,922; GRCh37/hg19) located in the splice donor site of exon 14 within the RNB domain was identified in a MM case from family D (Fig. 1a, b, Supplementary figure S1c). However, the individual’s mother (Q59), affected with amyloidosis, did not carry the variant, implying that MM in the allele carriers’ maternal uncles is unlikely to be explained by this DIS3 variant. Whether the mRNA transcript encoded by this germline variant undergoes NMD could not be explored due to lack of appropriate material (LCLs, RNA).
Fig. 1

DIS3 variants in MM cases. a Pedigrees from families carrying a germline DIS3 variant. Available samples for screening are marked with a “+” symbol. Families A and C carry the p.*959Glnext*14 (c.2875T>C) stop-loss variant. Family B carries the c.1755+1G>T splicing variant and family D carries the c.1883+1G>C splicing variant. The genotype of all screened individuals is shown on each pedigree. WT: wild type. b, c Schematic representation of identified germline and somatic variants in the distinct DIS3 protein domains. b Germline variants were identified through WES and targeted resequencing in families with reoccurrence of MM/MGUS as well as in a collection of sporadic MM cases (MMRF CoMMpass Study). The DIS3 variants discussed in the present study are depicted with a star on the upper part of the figure. c Somatic DIS3 variants were identified in sporadic MM cases from the MMRF CoMMpass Study. We observe that in contrast to the clustering of somatic DIS3 missense variants in the RNB and PIN domains, germline variants are scattered throughout the gene and consist of splicing, stop-loss and missense variants

Fig. 2

DIS3 c.1755+1G>T splicing variant results in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) and affects mRNA expression, while the c.2875C>T (p.*959Glnext*14) stop-loss variant affects protein levels. a LCLs from patients E18 and E28 (not shown) carrying the c.1755+1G>T splicing variant were cultured with and without puromycin. The chromatogram from treated cells (with puromycin) showed a mixture of the wild-type and mutant transcript lacking exon 13, which was not detected in the non-treated cells (without puromycin). Thus, the mutant transcript is degraded by NMD. b Box plot representing the relative DIS3 mRNA expression in c.1775+1G>A (n=2) and p.*959Glnext*14 (n = 1) carriers compared to non-carriers (n = 4). All reactions were performed in triplicates. c Western blot with an anti-DIS3 antibody was performed in LCLs from one p.*959Glnext*14 carrier and two wild-type individuals (anti-GAPDH antibody as internal control). The relative DIS3 expression in the p.*959Glnext*14 carrier was reduced by 50% compared to non-carriers, suggesting that the mutant allele is translated but degraded shortly after

DIS3 variants in MM cases. a Pedigrees from families carrying a germline DIS3 variant. Available samples for screening are marked with a “+” symbol. Families A and C carry the p.*959Glnext*14 (c.2875T>C) stop-loss variant. Family B carries the c.1755+1G>T splicing variant and family D carries the c.1883+1G>C splicing variant. The genotype of all screened individuals is shown on each pedigree. WT: wild type. b, c Schematic representation of identified germline and somatic variants in the distinct DIS3 protein domains. b Germline variants were identified through WES and targeted resequencing in families with reoccurrence of MM/MGUS as well as in a collection of sporadic MM cases (MMRF CoMMpass Study). The DIS3 variants discussed in the present study are depicted with a star on the upper part of the figure. c Somatic DIS3 variants were identified in sporadic MM cases from the MMRF CoMMpass Study. We observe that in contrast to the clustering of somatic DIS3 missense variants in the RNB and PIN domains, germline variants are scattered throughout the gene and consist of splicing, stop-loss and missense variants DIS3 c.1755+1G>T splicing variant results in nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) and affects mRNA expression, while the c.2875C>T (p.*959Glnext*14) stop-loss variant affects protein levels. a LCLs from patients E18 and E28 (not shown) carrying the c.1755+1G>T splicing variant were cultured with and without puromycin. The chromatogram from treated cells (with puromycin) showed a mixture of the wild-type and mutant transcript lacking exon 13, which was not detected in the non-treated cells (without puromycin). Thus, the mutant transcript is degraded by NMD. b Box plot representing the relative DIS3 mRNA expression in c.1775+1G>A (n=2) and p.*959Glnext*14 (n = 1) carriers compared to non-carriers (n = 4). All reactions were performed in triplicates. c Western blot with an anti-DIS3 antibody was performed in LCLs from one p.*959Glnext*14 carrier and two wild-type individuals (anti-GAPDH antibody as internal control). The relative DIS3 expression in the p.*959Glnext*14 carrier was reduced by 50% compared to non-carriers, suggesting that the mutant allele is translated but degraded shortly after A third DIS3 variant disrupting the wild-type termination codon (stop-loss) (c.2875T>C; p.*959Gln; chr13:73,333,935; GRCh37/hg19, rs141067458) (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Figure S1b) was identified in two unrelated families (A and C, Fig. 1a). This variant is expected to result in a putative read-through variant and a DIS3 protein with an additional 13 amino acids in the C-terminus (p.*959Glnext*14). It was detected in 3 out of 4 affected siblings (2 MGUS (M63, O53) and 1 MM case (O29)), as well as 5 unaffected relatives (N14, N13, L41, M33 M50) from family A. The Mendelian segregation of this variant in this pedigree is also consistent with germline origin. An additional MM case from family C carried the variant, while we were unable to assess the other MM-afflicted family member (Fig. 1a). As expected of a stop-loss variant, NMD was not observed (data not shown), and gene expression analysis showed no effect on DIS3 mRNA levels (Fig. 2b). However, western blot analysis demonstrated that DIS3 protein levels were markedly lower (~50%) in the p.*959Glnext*14 carrier (O53, family A) compared to non-carriers (Fig. 2b, c). Next, we sought to determine if rare, putative deleterious variants in DIS3 were more frequent in an independent series of MM cases compared to unaffected individuals. We performed mutation burden tests between 781 MM cases and 3534 controls from the MMRF CoMMpass Study with WES data available. After testing for systemic bias in this dataset (see Supplementary Methods, Supplementary Figure S2), we undertook a burden test for association between functional DIS3 variants and MM. DIS3 putative functional variants (truncating and likely deleterious missense variants, see Supplementary Methods) were more frequent among MM patients (30/781) than controls (72/3534) (OR = 1.92 95%CI:1.25–2.96, p = 0.001). Although the p.*959Glnext*14 stop-loss variant was recurrently found in 10/781 MM cases and 15/3534 controls (OR = 3.07 95%CI:1.38 to 6.87, p = 0.0007), it did not entirely explain the excess of DIS3 variants among cases as there is evidence for association with other putative functional variants (Supplementary Figure S3a). We additionally genotyped the p.*959Glnext*14 stop-loss variant in an independent series of sporadic MM cases and controls from the IMMEnSE Consortium. While this variant was very rare in this series (8/3020 MM cases relative to 3/1786 controls), there was a consistent but non-significant association between this variant and MM (OR = 3.15 95% CI: 0.74–13.43 p = 0.122). To explore the functional consequence of germline DIS3 variants, we compared MM tumor transcriptomes from patients harboring germline (n = 21) and somatic (n = 96) DIS3 putative functional variants to non-carriers (n = 655). Differential expression analyses showed an enrichment of pathways associated with global ncRNA processing and translational termination in germline DIS3 carriers including ncRNA processing, ncRNA metabolic process, translational termination, and RNA metabolism. Among somatic DIS3 carriers, significantly enriched pathways include interferon alpha/beta signalling, mRNA splicing, mRNA processing and transcription (Supplementary Figure S3b, Supplementary tables S3 and S4a–d). These findings are consistent with the proposed DIS3 role in regulating mRNA processing [14] and more specifically mRNA decay, gene expression and small RNA processing [15]. We also observed that, several long-intergenic non-protein coding RNAs, non-coding and antisense RNAs were significantly enriched among DIS3 carriers (Supplementary table S5a, b) supporting previous studies that demonstrate an accumulation of transcripts from non-protein coding regions, snoRNA precursors and certain lncRNAs in DIS3 mutant cells, along a general deregulation of mRNA levels probably due to the sequestration of transcriptional factors from the accumulated nuclear RNAs [16]. To our knowledge, this is the first observation of germline DIS3 likely deleterious variants in familial MM and our results suggest that the involvement of DIS3 in MM etiology may extend beyond somatic alterations to germline susceptibility. We reported rare germline DIS3 variants in ~2.6% of our cohort of families with multiple cases of MM and MGUS (4/154). The germline variants described here are predicted to have loss-of-function impact on DIS3. Consistent with this, the 1755+1G>T (rs769194741) splicing variant induces NMD and results in reduced DIS3 mRNA expression, supporting the proposal that DIS3 is acting as a tumor suppressor gene in MM [13]. Moreover, the c.2875T>C (rs141067458) stop-loss variant (p.*959Glnext*14) results in reduced DIS3 protein expression suggesting that the mutant allele is translated but degraded shortly after. Notably, in contrast to the clustering of somatic DIS3 mutations in the PIN and RNB domains, germline variants identified both in familial and sporadic MM cases are scattered throughout the gene (Fig. 1b, c). Despite the fact that these variants do not segregate perfectly with MM in the identified families and the rarity of DIS3 germline likely deleterious variants limits our statistical power, the subsequent mutation burden and transcriptome analyses provided supportive data towards DIS3 acting as an “intermediate-risk” MM susceptibility gene. 18-LEU-1250_RevisedManuscript_SupplementaryData
  16 in total

Review 1.  Inherited genetic susceptibility to multiple myeloma.

Authors:  G J Morgan; D C Johnson; N Weinhold; H Goldschmidt; O Landgren; H T Lynch; K Hemminki; R S Houlston
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Direct evidence for a polygenic etiology in familial multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Britt-Marie Halvarsson; Anna-Karin Wihlborg; Mina Ali; Konstantinos Lemonakis; Ellinor Johnsson; Abhishek Niroula; Carrie Cibulskis; Niels Weinhold; Asta Försti; Evren Alici; Christian Langer; Michael Pfreundschuh; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist; Ingemar Turesson; Anders Waage; Kari Hemminki; Todd Golub; Hareth Nahi; Urban Gullberg; Markus Hansson; Björn Nilsson
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-04-07

3.  The molecular spectrum and clinical impact of DIS3 mutations in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Susann Weißbach; Christian Langer; Bernhard Puppe; Theodora Nedeva; Elisa Bach; Miriam Kull; Ralf Bargou; Hermann Einsele; Andreas Rosenwald; Stefan Knop; Ellen Leich
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 4.  Myeloma aetiology and epidemiology.

Authors:  G J Morgan; F E Davies; M Linet
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.529

5.  Initial genome sequencing and analysis of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Michael A Chapman; Michael S Lawrence; Jonathan J Keats; Kristian Cibulskis; Carrie Sougnez; Anna C Schinzel; Christina L Harview; Jean-Philippe Brunet; Gregory J Ahmann; Mazhar Adli; Kenneth C Anderson; Kristin G Ardlie; Daniel Auclair; Angela Baker; P Leif Bergsagel; Bradley E Bernstein; Yotam Drier; Rafael Fonseca; Stacey B Gabriel; Craig C Hofmeister; Sundar Jagannath; Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Amrita Krishnan; Joan Levy; Ted Liefeld; Sagar Lonial; Scott Mahan; Bunmi Mfuko; Stefano Monti; Louise M Perkins; Robb Onofrio; Trevor J Pugh; S Vincent Rajkumar; Alex H Ramos; David S Siegel; Andrey Sivachenko; A Keith Stewart; Suzanne Trudel; Ravi Vij; Douglas Voet; Wendy Winckler; Todd Zimmerman; John Carpten; Jeff Trent; William C Hahn; Levi A Garraway; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  DIS3 shapes the RNA polymerase II transcriptome in humans by degrading a variety of unwanted transcripts.

Authors:  Teresa Szczepińska; Katarzyna Kalisiak; Rafal Tomecki; Anna Labno; Lukasz S Borowski; Tomasz M Kulinski; Dorota Adamska; Joanna Kosinska; Andrzej Dziembowski
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Widespread genetic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma: implications for targeted therapy.

Authors:  Jens G Lohr; Petar Stojanov; Scott L Carter; Peter Cruz-Gordillo; Michael S Lawrence; Daniel Auclair; Carrie Sougnez; Birgit Knoechel; Joshua Gould; Gordon Saksena; Kristian Cibulskis; Aaron McKenna; Michael A Chapman; Ravid Straussman; Joan Levy; Louise M Perkins; Jonathan J Keats; Steven E Schumacher; Mara Rosenberg; Gad Getz; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 31.743

8.  Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Niccolo Bolli; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; David C Wedge; Peter Van Loo; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Inigo Martincorena; Kevin J Dawson; Francesco Iorio; Serena Nik-Zainal; Graham R Bignell; Jonathan W Hinton; Yilong Li; Jose M C Tubio; Stuart McLaren; Sarah O' Meara; Adam P Butler; Jon W Teague; Laura Mudie; Elizabeth Anderson; Naim Rashid; Yu-Tzu Tai; Masood A Shammas; Adam S Sperling; Mariateresa Fulciniti; Paul G Richardson; Giovanni Parmigiani; Florence Magrangeas; Stephane Minvielle; Philippe Moreau; Michel Attal; Thierry Facon; P Andrew Futreal; Kenneth C Anderson; Peter J Campbell; Nikhil C Munshi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A compendium of DIS3 mutations and associated transcriptional signatures in plasma cell dyscrasias.

Authors:  Marta Lionetti; Marzia Barbieri; Katia Todoerti; Luca Agnelli; Sonia Fabris; Giovanni Tonon; Simona Segalla; Ingrid Cifola; Eva Pinatel; Pierfrancesco Tassone; Pellegrino Musto; Luca Baldini; Antonino Neri
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-22

10.  Novel pedigree analysis implicates DNA repair and chromatin remodeling in multiple myeloma risk.

Authors:  Rosalie G Waller; Todd M Darlington; Xiaomu Wei; Michael J Madsen; Alun Thomas; Karen Curtin; Hilary Coon; Venkatesh Rajamanickam; Justin Musinsky; David Jayabalan; Djordje Atanackovic; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar; Susan Slager; Mridu Middha; Perrine Galia; Delphine Demangel; Mohamed Salama; Vijai Joseph; James McKay; Kenneth Offit; Robert J Klein; Steven M Lipkin; Charles Dumontet; Celine M Vachon; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  14 in total

1.  Genetic changes associated with relapse in favorable histology Wilms tumor: A Children's Oncology Group AREN03B2 study.

Authors:  Samantha Gadd; Vicki Huff; Andrew D Skol; Lindsay A Renfro; Conrad V Fernandez; Elizabeth A Mullen; Corbin D Jones; Katherine A Hoadley; Kai Lee Yap; Nilsa C Ramirez; Sheena Aris; Quy H Phung; Elizabeth J Perlman
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2022-05-25

Review 2.  Molecular characteristics and functional differences of anti-PM/Scl autoantibodies and two other distinct and unique supramolecular structures known as "EXOSOMES".

Authors:  Peter J Wermuth; Sergio A Jimenez
Journal:  Autoimmun Rev       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 9.754

3.  Sequencing at lymphoid neoplasm susceptibility loci maps six myeloma risk genes.

Authors:  Rosalie Griffin Waller; Robert J Klein; Joseph Vijai; James D McKay; Alyssa Clay-Gilmour; Xiaomu Wei; Michael J Madsen; Douglas W Sborov; Karen Curtin; Susan L Slager; Kenneth Offit; Celine M Vachon; Steven M Lipkin; Charles Dumontet; Nicola J Camp
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.150

4.  Characterization of rare germline variants in familial multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Calogerina Catalano; Nagarajan Paramasivam; Joanna Blocka; Sara Giangiobbe; Stefanie Huhn; Matthias Schlesner; Niels Weinhold; Rolf Sijmons; Mirjam de Jong; Christian Langer; Klaus-Dieter Preuss; Björn Nilsson; Brian Durie; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Obul Reddy Bandapalli; Kari Hemminki; Asta Försti
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 5.  A Journey Through Myeloma Evolution: From the Normal Plasma Cell to Disease Complexity.

Authors:  Matteo C Da Vià; Bachisio Ziccheddu; Akihiro Maeda; Filippo Bagnoli; Giulia Perrone; Niccolò Bolli
Journal:  Hemasphere       Date:  2020-11-24

Review 6.  Genome Instability in Multiple Myeloma: Facts and Factors.

Authors:  Anna Y Aksenova; Anna S Zhuk; Artem G Lada; Irina V Zotova; Elena I Stepchenkova; Ivan I Kostroma; Sergey V Gritsaev; Youri I Pavlov
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 7.  The Significance of mRNA in the Biology of Multiple Myeloma and Its Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Anna Puła; Paweł Robak; Damian Mikulski; Tadeusz Robak
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Coinherited genetics of multiple myeloma and its precursor, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Authors:  Alyssa I Clay-Gilmour; Michelle A T Hildebrandt; Elizabeth E Brown; Jonathan N Hofmann; John J Spinelli; Graham G Giles; Wendy Cozen; Parveen Bhatti; Xifeng Wu; Rosalie G Waller; Alem A Belachew; Dennis P Robinson; Aaron D Norman; Jason P Sinnwell; Sonja I Berndt; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji K Kumar; Stephen J Chanock; Mitchell J Machiela; Roger L Milne; Susan L Slager; Nicola J Camp; Elad Ziv; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-06-23

Review 9.  Post-transcriptional control of cellular differentiation by the RNA exosome complex.

Authors:  Isabela Fraga de Andrade; Charu Mehta; Emery H Bresnick
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 10.  Nuclear RNA Exosome and Pervasive Transcription: Dual Sculptors of Genome Function.

Authors:  Koichi Ogami; Hiroshi I Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.