| Literature DB >> 30967499 |
Beata Gajda-Deryło1, Thomas Stahnke2, Stephan Struckmann3, Gregor Warsow3, Kerstin Birke4, Marco T Birke4, Bettina Hohberger5, Robert Rejdak6, Georg Fuellen7, Anselm G Jünemann8.
Abstract
We aimed to identify differences in cytokine/chemokine levels in the aqueous humor (AH) of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients who suffered from scarring, compared with POAG patients with no scarring after trabeculectomy surgery. Identification of differently expressed cytokines and chemokines may help to understand scarring and fibrotic processes following trabeculectomy, and to make predictions for the outcome of fistulating surgery in the future. Furthermore, the identification of cell signaling pathways involved in fibrosis offers the opportunity for a more specific antifibrotic therapy with reduced side effects, and an improvement in long-term surgical outcome.Eight samples of AH were collected during trabeculectomy surgery and commercially available cytokine/chemokine arrays were used. Specific, differently expressed proteins (cytokines/chemokines) in AH samples from patients with positive and negative surgery outcomes were detected. These proteins were classified based on their known profibrotic, inflammatory, adhesive, and apoptotic properties. Transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were among the most important profibrotic cytokines that we detected. Differences in the fold change of protein expression were highly significant between patients after successful and failed trabeculectomy surgery, and these were processed and visualized using ExprEssence software.This pilot study revealed differences in concentrations of cytokines/chemokines in AH between the two examined groups of patients. Our findings suggest that a positive outcome from trabeculectomy is strongly related to an inhibition of the fibrosis process.Entities:
Keywords: bioinformatics; ophthalmology; protein expression
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30967499 PMCID: PMC6499456 DOI: 10.1042/BSR20181894
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biosci Rep ISSN: 0144-8463 Impact factor: 3.840
Clinical characteristics of patients
| Age | Gender | Trab outcome | Type of med | Number of med* | Stage of OA | MD | IOP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | F | + | timolol, brimonidine | 2 | 2 | 1.1 | 14 | |
| 46 | F | + | timolol | 1 | 4 | 11.4 | 15 | |
| 58 | F | + | timolol | 1 | 3 | 2 | 35 | |
| 44 | F | + | acetazolamide, latanoprost, brinzolamide | 3 | 3 | 4.7 | 24 | |
| 59 | M | + | acetazolamide, brimonidine, timolol, brinzolamide | 4 | 1 | 3.4 | 28 | |
| 74 | F | - | 0 | 3 | −0.3 | 26 | ||
| 54 | F | - | tImolol, acetazolamide, tafluprost, | 3 | 3 | −0.4 | 17 | |
| 55 | M | - | latanoprost, timolol | 2 | 1/2 | 1.7 | 11 |
Abbreviations: med, antiglaucomatous medication; Trab, trabeculectomy.
* = Number of medications before they were taken off 1 week before surgery, stage of OA: glaucomatous optic nerve atrophy according to the stages given by Jonas et al. [20], MD, mean deviation in standard automated perimetry (Octopus 500).
Figure 1Fibrotic mechanisms following trabeculectomy, visualized based on mapping the protein expression data on to a STRING network
Edges with LinkScores close to zero were removed, keeping only 10% of the edges with the largest and 10% of the edges with the smallest LinkScores. The LinkScore is represented by color (green = small, red = large) and by the thickness of the links. Inhibition links are drawn with a T-bar, activation links with an arrow. Interaction links without known direction are shown without T-bar or arrow. The colors in the nodes represent the protein expression measurements for the two conditions (left = healthy, right = fibrotic).
Figure 2Fibrotic mechanisms following trabeculectomy, differentially expressed genes/proteins
Selection of gene names of the proteins with significantly diminished (red) or increased (blue) expression in the AH of POAG patients after failed trabeculectomy compared with patients with successful surgery outcome. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. Levels of significance: *P≤0.05; **P≤0.01; ***P≤0.001; ****P≤0.0001; ns, not significant.