Literature DB >> 30967028

Signal pathways involved in microbe-nematode interactions provide new insights into the biocontrol of plant-parasitic nematodes.

Lian-Ming Liang1,2, Cheng-Gang Zou1,2, Jianping Xu1,3, Ke-Qin Zhang1,2.   

Abstract

Plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) cause severe damage to agricultural crops worldwide. As most chemical nematicides have negative environmental side effects, there is a pressing need for developing efficient biocontrol methods. Nematophagous microbes, the natural enemies of nematodes, are potential biocontrol agents against PPNs. These natural enemies include both bacteria and fungi and they use diverse methods to infect and kill nematodes. For instance, nematode-trapping fungi can sense host signals and produce special trapping devices to capture nematodes, whereas endo-parasitic fungi can kill nematodes by spore adhesion and invasive growth to break the nematode cuticle. By contrast, nematophagous bacteria can secrete virulence factors to kill nematodes. In addition, some bacteria can mobilize nematode-trapping fungi to kill nematodes. In response, nematodes can also sense and defend against the microbial pathogens using strategies such as producing anti-microbial peptides regulated by the innate immunity system. Recent progresses in our understanding of the signal pathways involved in microbe-nematode interactions are providing new insights in developing efficient biological control strategies against PPNs. This article is part of the theme issue 'Biotic signalling sheds light on smart pest management'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biocontrol; microbe–nematode interaction; nematophagous fungi; plant-parasitic nematode; signal transduction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30967028      PMCID: PMC6367146          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  6 in total

1.  Rhizosphere 16S-ITS Metabarcoding Profiles in Banana Crops Are Affected by Nematodes, Cultivation, and Local Climatic Variations.

Authors:  Aurelio Ciancio; Laura Cristina Rosso; Javier Lopez-Cepero; Mariantonietta Colagiero
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 6.064

2.  Bermudagrass Cultivars with Different Tolerance to Nematode Damage Are Characterized by Distinct Fungal but Similar Bacterial and Archaeal Microbiomes.

Authors:  Chang Jae Choi; Jacqueline Valiente; Marco Schiavon; Braham Dhillon; William T Crow; Ulrich Stingl
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-02-16

3.  Gene sdaB Is Involved in the Nematocidal Activity of Enterobacter ludwigii AA4 Against the Pine Wood Nematode Bursaphelenchus xylophilus.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Zhibo Yuan; Shuang Wang; Haoyu Wang; Yanjie Chao; Ronald R Sederoff; Heike Sederoff; He Yan; Jialiang Pan; Mu Peng; Di Wu; Rainer Borriss; Ben Niu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 6.064

4.  Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of the nematophagous fungus Purpureocillium lavendulum.

Authors:  Lian-Ming Liang; Ying Zhang; Jianping Xu; Ke-Qin Zhang; Yan-Ru Cao
Journal:  Mitochondrial DNA B Resour       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 0.658

5.  Tobacco Root Microbial Community Composition Significantly Associated With Root-Knot Nematode Infections: Dynamic Changes in Microbiota and Growth Stage.

Authors:  Yi Cao; Zhi-Xiao Yang; Dong-Mei Yang; Ning Lu; Shi-Zhou Yu; Jian-Yu Meng; Xing-Jiang Chen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Regulatory Mechanism of Trap Formation in the Nematode-Trapping Fungi.

Authors:  Mei-Chen Zhu; Xue-Mei Li; Na Zhao; Le Yang; Ke-Qin Zhang; Jin-Kui Yang
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.