| Literature DB >> 30966909 |
Lars Mikael Broman1,2,3, Lisa Prahl Wittberg4, C Jerker Westlund1, Martijn Gilbers5,6, Luisa Perry da Câmara7, Jan Westin8, Fabio Silvio Taccone3,9, Maximilian Valentin Malfertheiner3,10, Matteo Di Nardo3,11, Justyna Swol3,12, Leen Vercaemst3,13, Nicholas A Barrett3,14, Federico Pappalardo3,15, Jan Belohlavek3,16, Thomas Müller3,10, Mirko Belliato3,17, Roberto Lorusso3,4.
Abstract
The use of extracorporeal life support devices such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults requires cannulation of the patient's vessels with comparatively large diameter cannulae to allow circulation of large volumes of blood (>5 L/min). The cannula diameter and length are the major determinants for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation flow. Manufacturing companies present pressure-flow charts for the cannulae; however, these tests are performed with water. Aims of this study were 1. to investigate the specified pressure-flow charts obtained when using human blood as the circulating medium and 2. to support extracorporeal membrane oxygenation providers with pressure-flow data for correct choice of the cannula to reach an optimal flow with optimal hydrodynamic performance. Eighteen extracorporeal membrane oxygenation drainage cannulae, donated by the manufacturers (n = 6), were studied in a centrifugal pump driven mock loop. Pressure-flow properties and cannula features were described. The results showed that when blood with a hematocrit of 27% was used, the drainage pressure was consistently higher for a given flow (range 10%-350%) than when water was used (data from each respective manufacturer's product information). It is concluded that the information provided by manufacturers in line with regulatory guidelines does not correspond to clinical performance and therefore may not provide the best guidance for clinicians.Entities:
Keywords: cannula; drainage; extracorporeal; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; flow; life support; pressure; venous
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30966909 DOI: 10.1177/0267659119830514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perfusion ISSN: 0267-6591 Impact factor: 1.972