| Literature DB >> 30966602 |
Mengyun Yang1, Junjie Pan2, Anchang Xu3, Lei Luo4, Deshan Cheng5, Guangming Cai6, Jinfeng Wang7,8, Bin Tang9,10, Xungai Wang11,12.
Abstract
Conductive cotton fabric was prepared by coating single-wall carbon nanotubes (CNTs) on a knitted cotton fabric surface through a "dip-and-dry" method. The combination of CNTs and cotton fabric was analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Raman scattering spectroscopy. The CNTs coating improved the mechanical properties of the fabric and imparted conductivity to the fabric. The electromechanical performance of the CNT-cotton fabric (CCF) was evaluated. Strain sensors made from the CCF exhibited a large workable strain range (0~100%), fast response and great stability. Furthermore, CCF-based strain sensors was used to monitor the real-time human motions, such as standing, walking, running, squatting and bending of finger and elbow. The CCF also exhibited strong electric heating effect. The flexible strain sensors and electric heaters made from CCF have potential applications in wearable electronic devices and cold weather conditions.Entities:
Keywords: conductive fabric; electric heating fabric; electromechanical performance; strain sensing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30966602 PMCID: PMC6404225 DOI: 10.3390/polym10060568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Preparation process of CNT-cotton fabrics.
Figure 2SEM images of (a,b) pristine cotton fabric and (c–f) CNT-cotton fabrics at different magnifications.
Figure 3Raman scattering spectra of the elastic cotton fabrics treated with different concentrations of CNTs.
Figure 4(a) A twisted CCF was used as a conductive wire for a light-emitting diode; (b) electrical resistivity of CNT-cotton fabrics corresponding to different CNT concentrations (one dip-dry cycle); and (c) different numbers of dip-dry cycles (0.05 wt % of CNT concentration).
Figure 5The resistivity change of CNT-cotton after different numbers of washing cycles.
Figure 6(a) Strength-elongation curves and (b) mechanical testing values for neat knitted cotton fabric and CCFs. Photographs of (c) CCF before and after the loading of a tensile strain of 40%, and (d) a twisted and knotted CCF.
Figure 7(a) Relative resistance change (∆R/R0) as a function of tensile strain of CCF; (b) relative resistance variation (∆R/R0) versus cyclic tensile strain of 3%, 5%, 10% and 20%; (c) resistance change under cyclic stretching-releasing with a strain of 10% at different loading speed; (d) the durability test of CCF under cyclic tensile.
Figure 8Detection of various human motions using CCF. (a) Photograph of CCF attached directly on a knee; (b,c) responsive curves of CCF on the knee under motions of standing, walking, running and squatting; (d) responsive curve of CCF on finger; (e) responsive curve of CCF on the elbow under cyclic bending; (f) photograph of CCF attached on the throat; (g) responsive curves of CCF when the wearer speaks “a,” “B” and “textile.”
Figure 9(a) Evolution of temperature of the CCF at different voltages; (b) temperature response of CCF at a cyclic voltage of 20 V; (c) time-dependent temperature curves of the CCF under different strains at 15 V; infrared thermal images of the CCF: (d) 20 s at different voltages; and (e) 20 V for different power-on periods.