| Literature DB >> 30966154 |
Massimo Malerba1, Raffaella Cerana2.
Abstract
In recent years, the search for biological methods to avoid the application of chemical products in agriculture has led to investigating the use of biopolymers-based materials. Among the tested biomaterials, the best results were obtained from those based on the biopolymer chitosan (CHT). CHT, available in large quantities from the deacetylation of chitin, has multiple advantages: it is safe, inexpensive and can be easily associated with other compounds to achieve better performance. In this review, we have summarized the latest researches of the application of CHT on plant productivity, plant protection against the attack of pathogens and extension of the commercial life of detached fruits.Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; defense responses; fruits; nanoparticles; pesticides; plant growth
Year: 2018 PMID: 30966154 PMCID: PMC6414918 DOI: 10.3390/polym10020118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
CHT effects on plant growth.
| Plant Species | CHT Formulation and Administration | CHT Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strawberry ( | 0.025–0.05% (plant spraying) | higher fruit yield | [ |
| Potato ( | 200, 325 and 558 mg/ha (foliar spraying) | enhancement of tuber size | [ |
| Bell pepper ( | 0.3–0.5% (leaves and fruits spraying) | increase in fruit weight, fruit diameter, and yield | [ |
| Basil ( | 0.02–0.04% (foliar spraying) | increase in plant growth and total phenol content | [ |
| Rice ( | 0.05% (plants soaking and spraying) | increase in plant growth, higher photosynthesis rate. | [ |
| Rape ( | 0.05–0.1% (foliar spraying) | increase in plant growth and leaf chlorophyll content | [ |
| Barley ( | 0.1–1% (germinating seeds) | higher phenolic content | [ |
| Maize ( | 0.04–0.16% (seeds soaking and plant spraying) | promotion of plant growth and grain weight | [ |
CHT effects on plant pathogens.
| Plant Species | CHT Formulation and Administration | Pathogen | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tomato ( | 0.4% (seeds soaking, fruits spraying) | [ | |
| Wheat ( | 0.1–0.5% (spikelets spraying) | [ | |
| Green bean ( | 0.025–0.2% (seeds soaking, foliar sprayimg) | [ | |
| Cucumber ( | 0.05–0.1% (foliar spraying) | [ | |
| Tea ( | 0.01% (foliar spraying) | [ | |
| Soybean ( | 0.5% (soil treatment) | [ | |
| Tomato ( | 0.01% (plant irrigation) | [ |
CHT effects on fruits.
| Plant Species | CHT Formulation and Administration | CHT Effect | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grape ( | Coating with 1% CHT and | Inhibition of | [ |
| Pomegranate ( | Coating with 1.5% CHT | Inhibition of | [ |
| Red kiwifruit ( | Coating with 1% CHT | Extension of the fruit commercial life | [ |
| Pear ( | Coating with 1% CHT | Inhibition of | [ |
| Mango ( | Coating with 1% CHT | Delay of fruit ripening, inhibition of | [ |
| Mango ( | Coating with 1% CHT and 0.1 ppm spermidine | Delay of fruit softening, accumulation of phenolic compounds during storage, induction of defense enzyme activities, inhibition of | [ |
| Mango ( | Coating with 1% CHT and | Inhibition of | [ |