| Literature DB >> 30966083 |
Piotr Owczarz1, Patryk Ziółkowski2, Zofia Modrzejewska3, Sławomir Kuberski4, Marek Dziubiński5.
Abstract
Chitosan colloidal systems, created by dispersing in aqueous solutions of hydrochloric acid, with and without the addition of disodium β-glycerophosphate (β-NaGP), were prepared for the investigation of forming mechanisms of chitosan hydrogels. Three types of chitosan were used in varying molecular weights. The impacts of the charge and shape of the macromolecules on the phase transition process were assessed. The chitosan system without the addition of β-NaGP was characterized by stiff and entangled molecules, in contrast to the chitosan system with the addition of β-NaGP, wherein the molecules adopt a more flexible and disentangled form. Differences in molecules shapes were confirmed using the Zeta potential and thixotropy experiments. The chitosan system without β-NaGP revealed a rapid nature of phase transition-consistent with diffusion-limited aggregation (DLA). The chitosan system with β-NaGP revealed a two-step nature of phase transition, wherein the first step was consistent with reaction-limited aggregation (RLA), while the second step complied with diffusion-limited aggregation (DLA).Entities:
Keywords: chitosan; gelation mechanism; hydrogel; phase transition
Year: 2018 PMID: 30966083 PMCID: PMC6414863 DOI: 10.3390/polym10010047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Properties of chitosan samples.
| Chitosan Samples | Weight Average Molar Mass Mw (g/mol) | Number Average Molar Mass Mn (g/mol) | Polydispersity Index PDI (–) | Degree of Acetylation DA (%) | Zeta Potential ζ (mV) 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No Addition of β-NaGP | Addition of β-NaGP | |||||
| Sample 1 | 463,000 | 79,000 | 5.9 | 16.8 | 48.5 (±1.9) | 4.74 (±5.3) |
| Sample 2 | 680,000 | 110,000 | 6.1 | 18.2 | 42.3 (±4.4) | 1.76 (±4.2) |
| Sample 3 | 862,000 | 145,000 | 5.9 | 16.6 | 37.4 (±2.4) | 3.23 (±4.5) |
1 Zeta potential values expressed as an average of 30 repeated measurements on the same sample at constant temperature 30 °C. Some of a Zeta potential values for samples with β-NaGP were below zero, hence standard deviation values are higher than average values.
Figure 1Influence of the temperature on the pH value for different chitosan solutions.
Figure 2Zeta potential values determined during heating of sample 2 with addition of β-NaGP. Error bars represent the standard deviation.
Figure 3Influence of the temperature on the flow behaviour index no values for different chitosan solutions (the lines are only for visual aid).
Figure 4The storage modulus G′ and loss modulus G″ as a function of temperature. (a–c) Samples without addition of β-NaGP. (d–f) Samples with addition of β-NaGP.
Figure 5The time-temperature relationship from Equation (1) on Arrhenius plot enabling to determination of activation energy. The straight lines represent the linear approximation of the Equation (1). (a–c) Samples without addition of β-NaGP. The red triangles represent experimental data from phase transition stage (see Figure 4). (d–f) Samples with addition of β-NaGP. The blue squares and red triangles represent experimental data from region 1 and region 2, respectively (see Figure 4).
Figure 6(a) Storage modulus and shear viscosity during the three interval thixotropy test for a sample 1 with addition of β-NaGP. (b) Deformation parameters as a function of molecular weight for all investigate samples (the lines are only for visual aid).
Parameters of second order structural model for all investigated samples.
| Chitosan Samples | Shear Rate (s−1) | G0 (Pa) | Ge (Pa) | k (×102) | Ge/G0 | R2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| −β * | +β * | −β | +β | −β | +β | −β | +β | −β | +β | ||
| Sample 1 | 101 | - ** | 0.89 | - | 2.36 | - | 0.12 | - | 2.64 | - | 0.96 |
| 102 | 0.31 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 1.96 | 1.23 | 0.38 | 1.13 | 2.64 | 0.79 | 0.98 | |
| 103 | 0.28 | 0.46 | 0.35 | 2.13 | 5.99 | 0.34 | 1.31 | 4.68 | 0.91 | 0.99 | |
| Sample 2 | 101 | - | 5.09 | - | 7.57 | - | 0.67 | - | 1.49 | - | 0.90 |
| 102 | 4.06 | 4.25 | 4.61 | 8.18 | 4.08 | 1.09 | 1.13 | 1.92 | 0.96 | 0.96 | |
| 103 | 3.94 | 3.41 | 4.73 | 8.16 | 5.49 | 0.96 | 1.20 | 2.40 | 0.94 | 0.97 | |
| Sample 3 | 101 | - | 4.93 | - | 8.87 | - | 0.68 | - | 1.80 | - | 0.93 |
| 102 | 3.31 | 3.80 | 3.76 | 7.71 | 1.76 | 1.35 | 1.14 | 2.03 | 0.96 | 0.96 | |
| 103 | 3.35 | 3.27 | 3.93 | 7.80 | 3.21 | 1.26 | 1.17 | 2.38 | 0.95 | 0.97 | |
* Samples without addition of β-NaGP (−β), samples with addition of β-NaGP (+β). ** Not possible to fitted data because of the weak phenomenon of deformation.
Figure 7Comparison of the two types of chitosan systems. Shape configuration of chitosan macromolecule and proposed forming of structure.