| Literature DB >> 30965802 |
Mehmet Arslan1, Mehmet Atilla Tasdelen2.
Abstract
The emerging areas of polymer nanocomposites, as some are already in use in industrial applications and daily commodities, have the potential of offering new technologies with all manner of prominent capabilities. The incorporation of nanomaterials into polymeric matrix provides significant improvements, such as higher mechanical, thermal or electrical properties. In these materials, interface/interphase of components play a crucial role bringing additional features on the resulting nanocomposites. Among the various preparation strategies of such materials, an appealing strategy relies on the use of click chemistry concept as a multi-purpose toolbox for both fabrication and modulation of the material characteristics. This review aims to deliver new insights to the researchers of the field by noticing effective click chemistry-based methodologies on the preparation of polymer nanocomposites and their key applications such as optic, biomedical, coatings and sensor.Entities:
Keywords: click chemistry; functional nanocomposites; polymer nanocomposites
Year: 2017 PMID: 30965802 PMCID: PMC6418640 DOI: 10.3390/polym9100499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1Representation of widely applied click reactions in polymer nanocomposite fabrication.
Figure 1Formation of nanocrystal cellulose-based nanocomposites via CuAAC click reaction. Adapted with permission from [19]. Copyright © 2015 by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Figure 2Modification and CuAAC click coupling of lignin in nanocomposite fabrication. Adapted with permission from [20]. Copyright © 2016 by the American Chemical Society.
Figure 3Preparation of boronic acid functional silica-based nanocomposites via the combination of surface-initiated ATRP and CuAAC click reaction. Adapted with permission from [31]. Copyright © 2017 by the American Chemical Society.
Figure 4Fabrication of p(NIPAm)/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites via CuAAC click reaction and surface-initiated RAFT polymerization. Adapted with permission from [66]. Copyright © 2011 by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Figure 5Synthesis of covalently bonded and reversibly cross-linked rubber nanocomposites via Diels–Alder reaction. Adapted with permission from [103]. Copyright © 2016 by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
Figure 6Preparation of Fe3O4 NPs/polybenzoxazine grafts via DA reaction. Adapted with permission from [109]. Copyright © 2016 by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.
Figure 7Fabrication of film and fiber nanocomposites of Au NPs via thiol click chemistry. Adapted with permission from [141]. Copyright © 2013 by the American Chemical Society.
Figure 8Thiol-ene- and thiol-yne-mediated polymer grafting from graphene surface. Adapted with permission from [170]. Copyright © 2013 by The Royal Society of Chemistry.
Main advantages and associated limitations of commonly employed click reactions in polymer nanocomposite fabrication.
| Click Reaction | Advantages | Limitations | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| CuAAC click reaction | High selectivity, rapid and quantitative transformations, tolerance to diverse organic solvents and water, stability, orthogonality. | Need to use (toxic) metal catalyst. Removal of the catalyst. | Particularly suitable for effective coupling of nanofillers and matrices. Provides improvement in interfacial compatibility. |
| Metal-free click reaction | Selectivity, high reactivity, biocompatibility and stability. | Substrates such as strained cyclooctynes are not so common and expensive materials. | Suitable if toxic metal catalyst is an issue, especially in biomedical applications. |
| Diels–Alder reaction | Activation through heating (could be beneficial in certain cases). Most of the time no byproduct formation. Reversibility of the reaction. | Heating requirement (could be a problem in certain cases), relatively prolonged reactions times. | Nanofiller surface can act as a substrate which resolves the destructive surface chemical treatments. Reversible nature is useful in self-healing materials. |
| Thiol-ene and thiol-yne reactions | High efficiency, high conversions, UV or heat-triggered activation. | Thiols are prone to many side reactions and have low self-stability. Especially the volatile thiols have disagreeable odors. | Reaction mechanism may induce more homogeneous network formation and reduces the network shrinkage. UV-triggered nature might be useful in coating applications. |