| Literature DB >> 30965783 |
Chunli Wu1, Xueming Li2, Siyu Song3, Yuxin Pei4, Lili Guo5, Zhichao Pei6.
Abstract
A quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) biosensor based on polydopamine (Entities:
Keywords: binding kinetics; biosensor; polydopamine; protein-protein interactions; quartz crystal microbalance
Year: 2017 PMID: 30965783 PMCID: PMC6418727 DOI: 10.3390/polym9100482
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic of the QCM (quartz crystal microbalance) biosensor flow-through system.
Figure 2Schematic illustration of the QCM biosensor based on polydopamine surface.
Figure 3The QCM gold sensor chip before (A) and after (B) PDA (polydopamine) coating.
Figure 4XPS (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy) spectra of unmodified gold sensor chip (A), PDA-coated gold sensor chip (B) and anti-myoglobin 7005 antibody immobilized PDA coated gold sensor chip (C).
Figure 5Fluorescent images of the PDA-coated sensor chip before (A) and after (B) the incubation with avidin-FITC (fluorescein isothiocyanate) (C) The subsequent biotinylated Con A capturing and mannan test on the avidin-FITC surface were performed by three injections of 100 μg/mL biotinylated Con A (i–iii) and an injection of 100 μg/mL mannan (iv).
Figure 6QCM analysis of the binding of myoglobin with anti-myoglobin 7005 antibody immobilized on the PDA-coated sensor surface. Frequency shift was recorded during the association (84 s) and dissociation (300 s) phases of the interaction between myoglobin and anti-myoglobin 7005, as well as the subsequent desorption of the remaining bound myoglobin by an injection of the 10 mM glycine pH 1.5. (i) Base line; (ii) Association; (iii) Dissociation; (iv) Regeneration.
Figure 7Reproducibility and specificity of the sensor surface. Solid lines: four cycles (black, red, green and blue curves) of the interaction between myoglobin (4 μg/mL) and anti-myoglobin 7005 antibody; Dotted lines: two cycles (teal and magenta curves) of the interaction between BSA (4 μg/mL) and anti-myoglobin 7005 antibody.
Figure 8Kinetic evaluation of the interactions between myoglobin and anti-myoglobin 7005 antibody. Myoglobin at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μg/mL (14.7, 29.4, 58.8, 118 and 235 nM) was injected over the sensor surface and the responses were recorded (black lines). Theoretical 1:1 fit using the Evaluation software (Attana) was overlaid (red lines). (A) Anti-myoglobin 7005 antibody was immobilized on the PDA-coated sensor surface; (B) Anti-myoglobin 7005 was immobilized on the carboxyl sensor surface via amine coupling.
Figure 9Reuse of the sensor chip for kinetic evaluation of the interactions between myoglobin and anti-myoglobin 7005 antibody. Myoglobin at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 μg/mL (14.7, 29.4, 58.8, 118 and 235 nM) was injected over the sensor surface and the responses were recorded (black lines). Theoretical 1:1 fit using the Evaluation software (Attana) was overlaid (red lines).