| Literature DB >> 30965733 |
Po-Chih Yang1, Si-Qiao Li2, Yueh-Han Chien3, Ta-Lun Tao4, Ruo-Yun Huang5, Hsueh-Yu Chen6.
Abstract
We report the responsive fluoresceical">nEntities:
Keywords: Heck reaction; carbazole; reversible addition-fragmentation transfer (RAFT); sensing
Year: 2017 PMID: 30965733 PMCID: PMC6418694 DOI: 10.3390/polym9090427
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Scheme 1Synthetic routes of monomers.
Scheme 2Synthetic routes of polymers (PCaT and PCT).
Molecular weights and thermal properties of polymers.
| Polymer | Yield (%) | PDI a | Molar ratio ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PC2Br | 18.4 | 6.78 | 1.12 | 186.6 | 314.3 | ― |
| PCaT | 10.3 | 7.92 | 1.14 | 198.3 | 343.0 | 94:6 |
| PCT | 35.6 | 12.2 | 1.65 | 159.8 | 268.7 | 55:45 |
a Mw and polydispersity index (PDI) of the polymer were determined by gel permeation chromatography using polystyrene standards in tetrahydrofuran. b Glass transition temperatures by differential scanning calorimeter under N2 at a heating rate of 20 °C/min. c Temperatures at 5% weight loss. d Final molar ratio of carbazole and terpyridine-based monomer was determined by 1H NMR spectra.
Figure 1Absorption and photoluminescence spectra of (a) PCaT and (b) PCT in THF solution (solid line) and in thin film (dotted line).
Optical properties of polymers.
| Polymer | UV-vis λmax sol’n (nm) a | UV-vis λmax film (nm) a | PL λmax sol’n (nm) b | PL λmax film (nm) b | Stokes shift c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCaT | 271, 346s | 293, 350s | 381 | 394 | 110 | 0.062 |
| PCT | 232, 275s | 297 | 391 | 428, 529s | 159 | 0.51 |
a Measured in THF solution (1.0 × 10−6 M). Superscript s means the wavelength of the shoulder. b The excitation wavelength was 235 nm in THF for polymers. c Stokes shift = PL(film)/nm − UV(film)/nm. d These values of quantum yield were measured using poly(9,9-dihexylfluorene) as a standard (1.0 × 10−7 M, assuming a quantum yield of unity).
Figure 2Photoluminescence spectra of (a) PCaT and (b) PCT in the presence of various metal ions (excitation: 235 nm). Concentration of polymers: 1.0 × 10−6 M in THF, concentration of metal ions: 5.0 × 10−5 M in water.
Figure 3Photoluminescence response profiles for (a) PCaT and (b) PCT solutions by adding various cations in THF.
Figure 4Fluorescence colors of (a) PCaT and (b) PCT solutions after the addition of various cations. The values in images are their corresponding quantum yields (ΦPLs) after adding the given cations.
Figure 5Absorption (left) and photoluminescence (right) spectral variations of (a) PCaT and (b) PCT in the presence of various concentrations of Fe3+. Concentration of polymers: 1.0 × 10−6 M in THF; Inset: Stern‒Volmer plot of fluorescence quenching with various concentrations of Fe3+ ion.
Figure 6Photoluminescence spectra of (a) PCaT‒Fe3+ and (b) PCT‒Fe3+ in the presence of various anions. Inset: photoluminescence response profiles of polymer‒Fe3+ in the presence of various anions.
Figure 7Fluorescence colors of (a) PCaT‒Fe3+ and (b) PCT‒Fe3+ solutions after the addition of various anions. The values in images are their corresponding quantum yields (ΦPLs) after adding the given anions.
Figure 8(a) SEM and (b) TEM images of spherical micelles formed from PCaT in different amounts of THF‒H2O. The polymer concentration was 0.5 and 0.25 mg mL−1 for SEM and TEM observation, respectively.