Literature DB >> 30965064

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Masked Study of OTX-101 Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.

Damien F Goldberg1, Ranjan P Malhotra2, Barry A Schechter3, Angela Justice4, Sidney L Weiss5, John D Sheppard6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of OTX-101, a novel aqueous nanomicellar formulation of cyclosporine (0.09%), in the treatment of patients with dry eye disease (DED).
DESIGN: A randomized, multicenter, vehicle-controlled, double-masked, phase 3 clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (18-90 years of age) with a history and clinical diagnosis of DED, a global symptom score of 40 or more (range, 0-100), and a lissamine green conjunctival staining score of 3 or more and 9 or less (range, 0-12) in at least 1 eye.
METHODS: Eligible patients entered a run-in period of 14 to 20 days in which all patients administered vehicle twice daily. Patients who remained eligible at the baseline (day 0) visit were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to twice-daily treatment with OTX-101 0.09% or vehicle for 84 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy assessments included signs (unanesthetized Schirmer tear test, corneal and conjunctival staining) and symptoms (global symptom score) of DED. The primary end point was the proportion of eyes with a clinically meaningful improvement (increase of ≥10 mm) in Schirmer test score at day 84. Safety evaluations included adverse events (AEs), visual acuity, and intraocular pressure monitoring, slit-lamp, dilated ophthalmoscopy, and fundus examinations.
RESULTS: A total of 744 patients were randomized and received study medication (371 to OTX-101 0.09% and 373 to vehicle). The primary end point was achieved; a significantly greater percentage of eyes in the OTX-101 0.09% treatment group achieved an increase of 10 mm or more in the Schirmer test score at day 84 (OTX-101 0.09%, 16.6%; vehicle, 9.2%; P < 0.001). Significant improvements relative to vehicle also were observed for corneal (days 28, 56, and 84) and conjunctival (days 56 and 84) staining. The global symptom score was reduced from baseline in both treatment groups by approximately 30%; however, no significant separation between groups was observed. The OTX-101 0.09% formulation was well tolerated. Treatment-emergent AEs were primarily mild in intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinically and statistically significant improvements in tear production and ocular surface integrity were observed in patients treated with OTX-101 0.09% for DED.
Copyright © 2019 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30965064     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.03.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  14 in total

Review 1.  Selective Pharmacologic Therapies for Dry Eye Disease Treatment: Efficacy, Tolerability, and Safety Data Review from Preclinical Studies and Pivotal Trials.

Authors:  Bridgitte Shen Lee; Melissa Toyos; Paul Karpecki; Jessica Schiffbauer; John Sheppard
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2022-05-24

2.  Preclinical Efficacy Comparison of Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Solution 0.09% vs Cyclosporine Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.05% vs Ciclosporin Ophthalmic Emulsion 0.1% in a NOD Mouse Model of Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Vinod Burade; Rishit Zalawadia; Alpesh Patel; Abayomi Ogundele
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-21

Review 3.  A Review of Topical Cyclosporine A Formulations-A Disease-Modifying Agent for Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Authors:  Gary W Jerkins; Guruprasad R Pattar; Shane R Kannarr
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-20

4.  Treatment Satisfaction Among Patients Using Anti-Inflammatory Topical Medications for Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Darrell E White; Yang Zhao; Hemalatha Jayapalan; Pattabhi Machiraju; Ramu Periyasamy; Abayomi Ogundele
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-19

Review 5.  Managing Dry Eye Disease and Facilitating Realistic Patient Expectations: A Review and Appraisal of Current Therapies.

Authors:  Bridgitte Shen Lee; Alan G Kabat; Jason Bacharach; Paul Karpecki; Jodi Luchs
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-14

6.  Phase 3 Efficacy (Worse-Eye Analysis) and Long-Term Safety Evaluation of OTX-101 in Patients with Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Authors:  John Sheppard; Mark Bergmann; Barry A Schechter; Jodi Luchs; Abayomi Ogundele; Paul Karpecki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-12

7.  New Nanoparticle Formulation for Cyclosporin A: In Vitro Assessment.

Authors:  Amandine Gendron; Natalie Lan Linh Tran; Julie Laloy; Romain Brusini; Aurélie Rachet; Frédéric Gobeaux; Valérie Nicolas; Pierre Chaminade; Sonia Abreu; Didier Desmaële; Mariana Varna
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 6.321

8.  A Water-free 0.1% Cyclosporine A Solution for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: Results of the Randomized Phase 2B/3 ESSENCE Study.

Authors:  John D Sheppard; David L Wirta; Eugene McLaurin; Blair E Boehmer; Joseph B Ciolino; Alice S Meides; Thomas Schlüter; George W Ousler; Dale Usner; Sonja Krösser
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Effect of Cyclosporine 0.09% Treatment on Accuracy of Preoperative Biometry and Higher Order Aberrations in Dry Eye Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  John A Hovanesian; Gregg J Berdy; Alice Epitropoulos; Jack T Holladay
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-09-01

10.  A Randomized Clinical Study (SEECASE) to Assess Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of NOV03 for Treatment of Dry Eye Disease.

Authors:  Joseph Tauber; David L Wirta; Kenneth Sall; Parag A Majmudar; Daniela Willen; Sonja Krösser
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 3.152

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.