Literature DB >> 30964732

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Infusion Efficiency Workgroup Study: Optimizing Patient Flow in Infusion Centers.

Jessica M Sugalski1, Timothy Kubal2, Daniel L Mulkerin3, Rebecca L Caires4, Penny J Moore5, Rosanna Fiorarancio Fahy6, Jeanine N Gordon6, Connie Z Augustyniak4, Gina M Szymanski7, MiKaela Olsen7, Diedra K Frantz2, Marisa A Quinn8, Sharol K Kidd9,10, Diana M Krause1, Robert W Carlson1, F Marc Stewart9,10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) formed an Infusion Efficiency Workgroup to determine best practices for operating efficient and effective infusion centers.
METHODS: The Workgroup conducted three surveys that were distributed to NCCN member institutions regarding average patient wait time, chemotherapy premixing practices, infusion chair use, and premedication protocols. To assess chair use, the Workgroup identified and defined five components of chair time.
RESULTS: The average patient wait time in infusion centers ranged from 25 to 102 minutes (n = 23; mean, 58 minutes). Five of 26 cancer centers (19%) routinely mix chemotherapy drugs before patient arrival for patients meeting specified criteria. Total planned chair time for subsequent doses of the same drug regimens for the same diseases varied greatly among centers, as follows: Administration of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide ranged from 85 to 240 minutes (n = 22); of FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride, and oxaliplation) ranged from 270 to 420 minutes (n = 22); of rituximab ranged from 120 to 350 minutes (n = 21); of paclitaxel plus carboplatin ranged from 255 to 380 minutes (n = 21); and of zoledronic acid ranged from 30 to 150 minutes (n = 22) for planned total chair time. Cancer centers were found to use different premedication regimens with varying administration routes that ranged in administration times from zero to 60 minutes.
CONCLUSION: There is a high degree of variation among cancer centers in regard to planned chair time for the same chemotherapy regimens, providing opportunities for improved efficiency, increased revenue, and more standardization across centers. The NCCN Workgroup demonstrates potential revenue impact and provides recommendations for cancer centers to move toward more efficient and more standard practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30964732     DOI: 10.1200/JOP.18.00563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  5 in total

1.  Opportunity Costs of Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Erin M Bange; Abigail Doucette; Peter E Gabriel; Florence Porterfield; James J Harrigan; Robin Wang; Andrzej P Wojcieszynski; Ben Boursi; Bethany I Mooney; Kim A Reiss; Ronac Mamtani
Journal:  JCO Oncol Pract       Date:  2020-03-04

2.  Intravenous Cetirizine vs Intravenous Diphenhydramine for the Prevention of Hypersensitivity Infusion Reactions: Results of an Exploratory Phase 2 Study.

Authors:  Jarrod P Holmes; Julio A Peguero; R Campbell Garland; Janine North; Stacia Young; Lonnie D Brent; Nancy Joseph-Ridge
Journal:  J Infus Nurs       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01

3.  ENTIMOS: A Discrete Event Simulation Model for Maximising Efficiency of Infusion Suites in Centres Treating Multiple Sclerosis Patients.

Authors:  Kristyna Lacinova; Praveen Thokala; Richard Nicholas; Pamela Dobay; Erik Scalfaro; Zuzanna Angehrn; Roisin Brennan; Ibolya Boer; Carol Lines; Nicholas Adlard
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.686

4.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Min Wang; Bo Yuan; Zhen-Huan Zhou; Wei-Wei Han
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Clinical outcome of FIGO 2018 stage IB3/IIA2 cervical cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery due to lack of radiotherapy equipment: A retrospective comparison with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jing Zeng; Peisong Sun; Quanhong Ping; Shan Jiang; Yuanjing Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.