Literature DB >> 30964202

Suboptimal response rates to hypomethylating agent therapy in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia; a single institutional study of 121 patients.

Tucker Coston1, Prateek Pophali1, Rangit Vallapureddy1, Terra L Lasho1, Christy M Finke1, Rhett P Ketterling2, Ryan Carr1, Moritz Binder1, Abhishek A Mangaonkar1, Naseema Gangat1, Aref Al-Kali1, Mark Litzow1, Darci Zblewski1, Animesh Pardanani1, Ayalew Tefferi1, Mrinal M Patnaik1.   

Abstract

Hypomethylating agents (HMA) are currently the only FDA approved therapy for patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). In the current retrospective study, we assessed response rates as adjudicated by the IWG (International Working Group) MDS (myelodysplastic syndrome) and MDS/MPN myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndrome response criteria, in 121 CMML patients treated with Azacitidine (AZA, n = 56) and Decitabine (DAC, n = 65). The overall response rates were 41% by the IWG MDS (AZA- 45%, DAC-39%), and 56% by the IWG MDS/MPN (AZA-56%, DAC-58%) response criteria, with CR (complete remission) rates of <20% for both agents, by both criteria. There were no significant differences in response rates between proliferative and dysplastic CMML. Moreover, 29% of CMML patients in a CR with HMA progressed to AML (blast transformation), underscoring the limited impact of these agents on disease biology. Progression after HMA response was associated with a median overall-survival (OS) of 8 months, while median OS in patients with primary HMA failure was 4 months. Lower serum LDH levels (<250 Units/L) were associated with HMA responses by both criteria; while ASXL1 and TET2 mutational status had no impact. HMA treated patients had a longer median OS (31 vs 18 months; P = .01), in comparison to those treated with conventional care regimens (excluding observation only patients), without any differences between AZA vs DAC (P = .37). In conclusion, this study highlights the inadequacies of HMA therapy in CMML, retrospectively validates the IWG MDS/MPN response criteria and underscores the need for newer, rationally derived therapies.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30964202     DOI: 10.1002/ajh.25488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hematol        ISSN: 0361-8609            Impact factor:   10.047


  14 in total

Review 1.  Treatment advances for pediatric and adult onset neoplasms with monocytosis.

Authors:  Kristen B McCullough; Alexis K Kuhn; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 2.  Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Onyee Chan; Aline Renneville; Eric Padron
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Myelodysplastic syndrome/myeloproliferative neoplasm overlap syndromes: a focused review.

Authors:  Mrinal M Patnaik; Terra Lasho
Journal:  Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program       Date:  2020-12-04

4.  Phase 1 study of lenzilumab, a recombinant anti-human GM-CSF antibody, for chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Mrinal M Patnaik; David A Sallman; Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Rachel Heuer; Jeffery Hirvela; Darci Zblewski; Aref Al-Kali; Moritz Binder; Maria E Balasis; Hannah Newman; Christopher Letson; Traci L Kruer; Naseema Gangat; Rami S Komrokji; Ayalew Tefferi; Adrian Lo; Ted Shih; Cameron Durrant; Alan F List; Eric Padron
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 5.  Increasing recognition and emerging therapies argue for dedicated clinical trials in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Aline Renneville; Mrinal M Patnaik; Onyee Chan; Eric Padron; Eric Solary
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 6.  Mutations in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia and their prognostic relevance.

Authors:  J Jian; Y Qiao; Y Li; Y Guo; H Ma; B Liu
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  RAS mutations drive proliferative chronic myelomonocytic leukemia via a KMT2A-PLK1 axis.

Authors:  Ryan M Carr; Denis Vorobyev; Terra Lasho; David L Marks; Ezequiel J Tolosa; Alexis Vedder; Luciana L Almada; Andrey Yurcheko; Ismael Padioleau; Bonnie Alver; Giacomo Coltro; Moritz Binder; Stephanie L Safgren; Isaac Horn; Xiaona You; Eric Solary; Maria E Balasis; Kurt Berger; James Hiebert; Thomas Witzig; Ajinkya Buradkar; Temeida Graf; Peter Valent; Abhishek A Mangaonkar; Keith D Robertson; Matthew T Howard; Scott H Kaufmann; Christopher Pin; Martin E Fernandez-Zapico; Klaus Geissler; Nathalie Droin; Eric Padron; Jing Zhang; Sergey Nikolaev; Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  How I diagnose and treat chronic myelomonocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Mrinal M Patnaik
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 11.047

9.  Real-world data of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: A chinese single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Liya Ma; Lingxu Jiang; Wenli Yang; Yingwan Luo; Chen Mei; Xinping Zhou; Gaixiang Xu; Weilai Xu; Li Ye; Yanlin Ren; Chenxi Lu; Peipei Lin; Jie Jin; Hongyan Tong
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Risk-Adapted, Individualized Treatment Strategies of Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia (CMML).

Authors:  Jan Philipp Bewersdorf; Amer M Zeidan
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.