| Literature DB >> 30964092 |
Sriti Pandey1, Anjali Somal2, Mehtab S Parmar3, Swati Gupta1, Mukesh K Bharti1, Irfan A Bhat1, B Indu1, Vikash Chandra1, G Sai Kumar4, G Taru Sharma1.
Abstract
Background & objectives: The lower recovery of competent oocytes in buffalo species limits the commercialization of in vitro embryo production technology in field condition. In this context, pre-maturation of small follicle (SF)-derived oocytes with meiotic inhibition may be a promising alternative to obtain more number of competent oocytes. Thus, the present study was conducted with an objective to enhance the developmental potential of less competent SF-derived buffalo oocytes.Entities:
Keywords: Blastocysts; buffalo; cytoplasmic maturation; developmental competence; oocytes; roscovitine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30964092 PMCID: PMC6469368 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2068_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Res ISSN: 0971-5916 Impact factor: 2.375
Fig. 1Different nuclear stages observed after ethidium bromide (EtBr) staining of pre-matured and matured denuded oocyte: (A) germinal vesicle (GV); (B) germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD); (C) metaphase I (MI); (D) ana-telophase (AT); (E) metaphase II (MII) (×400).
Fig. 2Brilliant cresyl blue stained oocytes: Blue stained oocytes are designated as brilliant cresyl blue +ve (blue arrow) and colourless oocytes are designated as brilliant cresyl blue −ve (white arrow).
Fig. 3Different embryonic developmental stages: (A) two-cell stage; (B) four-cell stage; (C) eight-cell stage; (D) Morula stage; (E) hatching blastocyst; (F) hatched blastocyst.
Fig. 4Relative gene expression of GDF9 and BMP15 in denuded oocytes. SF, small follicle derived; LF, large follicle derived; RT, roscovitine treated. *P<0.05 compared to SF and LF.
Fig. 6Relative gene expression of INF-τ, GLUT1 and POU5F1 in blastocysts. SF, small follicle derived; LF, large follicle derived; RT, roscovitine treated. *P<0.05 compared to SF and RT.
Fig. 7Cumulus expansion in different groups. COCs treated with different doses of roscovitine- (A) 12.5 μM; (B) 25 μM; (C) 50 μM; and (D) 100 μM.
Nuclear status of oocytes cultured for 24 h in roscovitine-supplemented maturation medium
| ROS (μM) | COCs, n# | GV, n (%) | GVBD, n (%) | MI, n (%) | AT, n (%) | MII, n (%) | Unstained, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 97 | 1 (1.03)a | 2 (2.06)a | 5 (5.15)a | 7 (7.22)a | 72 (74.23)a | 10 (10.31)a |
| 12.5 | 85 | 20 (23.53)b | 4 (4.7)b | 19 (22.35)b | 15 (17.65)b | 20 (23.53)b | 7 (8.24)a |
| 25 | 89 | 67 (75.28)c | 8 (8.99)c | 3 (3.37)a | 3 (3.37)a | 2 (2.25)c | 6 (6.74)a |
| 50 | 97 | 77 (79.38)c | 9 (9.28)c | 2 (2.06)a | 1 (1.03)a | 1 (1.03)c | 7 (7.22)a |
| 100 | 78 | 65 (83.34)c | 4 (5.13)b,c | 1 (1.28)a | 1 (1.28)a | 1 (1.28)c | 6 (7.69)a |
Values (mean%) in the same column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). #COCs obtained from 5 replicates for each group performed on different days. ROS, roscovitine; COCs, cumulus-oocyte complexes; GV, germinal vesicle; GVBD, germinal vesicle breakdown; MI, meiosis I; AT, ana-telophase; MII, meiosis II
Nuclear status of oocytes cultured for additional 24 h in inhibitor-free maturation medium
| ROS (μM) | COCs n# | GV, n (%) | GVBD, n (%) | MI, n (%) | AT, n (%) | MII, n (%) | Unstained, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 91 | 1 (1.1)a | 3 (3.3)a | 7 (7.69)a | 10 (10.99)a | 64 (70.33)a | 6 (6.59)a |
| 12.5 | 82 | 0 (0.0)a | 4 (4.88)a | 9 (10.98)a,b | 10 (12.2)a | 50 (60.98)a | 9 (10.98)a |
| 25 | 92 | 2 (2.17)a | 2 (2.17)a | 12 (13.04)a,b | 14 (15.22)a,b | 55 (59.78)a | 7 (7.61)a |
| 50 | 81 | 0 (0.0)a | 3 (3.70)a | 10 (12.35)a,b | 11 (13.58)a,b | 50 (61.72)a | 7 (8.64)a |
| 100 | 85 | 3 (3.53)a | 7 (8.24)a | 15 (17.65)b | 4 (4.71)b | 37 (43.53)b | 19 (22.35)b |
Values (mean%) in the column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05)
#COCs obtained from 5 replicates for each group performed on different days.
Abbreviations as given in Table I
Effect of different concentrations of roscovitine on subsequent embryo development
| Group | COCs, n# | Cleavage rate*, n (%) | Blastocyst rate$, n (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SF/0 μM RT | 410 | 152 (37.07±1.4) | 22 (14.47±0.9)a |
| 12.5 μM RT | 190 | 61 (38.27±1.4)a | 19 (14.96±1.7)a |
| 25 μM RT | 228 | 108 (47.56±1.5) | 31 (29.02±1.0)b |
| 50 μM RT | 274 | 136 (51.02±1.7)b | 41 (30.56±1.4)b |
| 100 μM RT | 147 | 58 (40.83±2.2)a | 9 (19.27±1.0)c |
| LF | 248 | 153 (61.69±0.8)c | 56 (36.6±1.4)d |
*,$Values (mean±SE%) in the column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05). #COCs obtained from five replicates for each group performed on different days; *On the basis of total COCs cultured; $On the basis of total oocytes cleaved. RT; roscovitine treated; COCs, cumulus-oocyte complexes; LF, large follicle; SF, small follicles
Fig. 5Relative gene expression of GREM1, PTGS2, HAS2 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in cumulus cells. SF, small follicle derived; LF, large follicle derived; RT, roscovitine treated. *P<0.05 compared to SF and LF; #P<0.05 compared to SF.