Literature DB >> 30963943

Male responses to sperm competition when rivals vary in number and familiarity.

Samuel J Lymbery1, Joseph L Tomkins1, Leigh W Simmons1.   

Abstract

Males of many species adjust their reproductive investment to the number of rivals present simultaneously. However, few studies have investigated whether males sum previous encounters with rivals, and the total level of competition has never been explicitly separated from social familiarity. Social familiarity can be an important component of kin recognition and has been suggested as a cue that males use to avoid harming females when competing with relatives. Previous work has succeeded in independently manipulating social familiarity and relatedness among rivals, but experimental manipulations of familiarity are confounded with manipulations of the total number of rivals that males encounter. Using the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus, we manipulated three factors: familiarity among rival males, the maximum number of rivals encountered simultaneously and the total number of rivals encountered over a 48 h period. Males produced smaller ejaculates when exposed to more rivals in total, regardless of the maximum number of rivals they encountered simultaneously. Males did not respond to familiarity. Our results demonstrate that males of this species can sum the number of rivals encountered over separate days, and therefore the confounding of familiarity with the total level of competition in previous studies should not be ignored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ejaculate size; intensity; risk; sexual conflict; social familiarity; sperm competition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30963943      PMCID: PMC6364580          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.2589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  2 in total

1.  Quantifying variation in female internal genitalia: no evidence for plasticity in response to sexual conflict risk in a seed beetle.

Authors:  Blake W Wyber; Liam R Dougherty; Kathryn McNamara; Andrew Mehnert; Jeremy Shaw; Joseph L Tomkins; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Larval social cues influence testicular investment in an insect.

Authors:  Junyan Liu; Xiong Z He; Xia-Lin Zheng; Yujing Zhang; Qiao Wang
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.624

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.