Literature DB >> 30963794

A cross-sectional study of YouTube videos as a source of patient information about phototherapy and excimer laser for psoriasis.

Deeti J Pithadia1, Kelly A Reynolds2, Erica B Lee3, Jashin J Wu4.   

Abstract

YouTube is increasingly utilized by patients for health information. We aimed to assess the educational quality of YouTube videos about phototherapy and excimer laser for psoriasis. A cross-sectional analysis of YouTube videos was conducted using the search terms psoriasis phototherapy and psoriasis laser. Of the 200 videos screened, 124 met inclusion criteria. Sixty-eight (54.8%) were generated by device manufacturers advertising their product, 35 (28.2%) by healthcare professionals, and 8 (6.5%) by patients delivering testimonials from experiences receiving therapy. Fourteen (11.2%) contained high-quality patient education content, 28 (22.5%) were fair quality, and 82 (66.1%) were low quality. Compared to videos generated by advertisers, those created by healthcare providers were of higher educational quality and more likely to be patient-directed. Neither the number of views nor interaction differed significantly among videos of varying educational quality, between videos presenting evidence-based versus non-evidence-based claims about psoriasis, and between videos conveying positive versus negative messages regarding medical consultation. Overall, the majority of YouTube videos about phototherapy and excimer laser advertise devices are of fair-to-low educational quality and are not patient-centric. The addition of more videos that accurately and holistically discuss patient-relevant aspects of these therapies may transform YouTube into a more effective resource for informing patient choices.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internet; YouTube; digital media; excimer laser; laser; phototherapy; psoriasis; treatment

Year:  2019        PMID: 30963794     DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2019.1605144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dermatolog Treat        ISSN: 0954-6634            Impact factor:   3.359


  4 in total

1.  Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.

Authors:  Wael Osman; Fatma Mohamed; Mohamed Elhassan; Abdulhadi Shoufan
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  YouTube as a source of patient education information for elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries: a quality control content analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan S Yu; Joseph E Manzi; John M Apostolakos; James B Carr Ii; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2022-05-23

3.  Fiction, Falsehoods, and Few Facts: Cross-Sectional Study on the Content-Related Quality of Atopic Eczema-Related Videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Simon M Mueller; Valentina N S Hongler; Pierre Jungo; Lucian Cajacob; Simon Schwegler; Esther H Steveling; Zita-Rose Manjaly Thomas; Oliver Fuchs; Alexander Navarini; Kathrin Scherer; Oliver Brandt
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  Accuracy and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Vitiligo.

Authors:  Louai A Salah; Saad AlTalhab; Aamir Omair; Mohammed AlJasser
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol       Date:  2022-01-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.