Literature DB >> 30963774

Why are UK junior doctors taking time out of training and what are their experiences? A qualitative study.

Chantelle Rizan1, Julia Montgomery2, Charlotte Ramage3, Jan Welch4, Graeme Dewhurst5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The number of doctors directly entering UK specialty training after their foundation year 2 (F2) has steadily declined from 83% in 2010 to 42.6% in 2017. The year following F2, outside the UK training pathway, is informally termed an 'F3' year. There is a paucity of qualitative research exploring why increasingly doctors are taking F3s. The aim of this study is to explore the reasons why F2 doctors are choosing to take a year out of training and the impact upon future career choices.
DESIGN: This is an exploratory qualitative study, using in-depth interviews and content analysis.
SETTING: UK. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen participants were interviewed from one foundation school. Participants included five doctors who commenced their F3 in 2015, five who started in 2016 and finally four recently starting this in 2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Content analysis was conducted to distill the themes which exemplified the totality of the experience of the three groups.
RESULTS: There were four predominant themes arising within the data set which can be framed as 'unmet needs' arising within foundation years, sought to be fulfilled by the F3 year. First, doctors describe exhaustion and stress resulting in a need for a 'break'. Second, doctors required more time to make decisions surrounding specialty applications and prepare competitive portfolios. Third, participants felt a loss of control which was (partially) regained during their F3s. The final theme was the impact of taking time out upon return to training (for those participants who had completed their F3 year). When doctors returned to NHS posts they brought valuable experience.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence to support the important ongoing initiatives from Health Education England and other postgraduate bodies, exploring approaches to further engage, retain and support the junior doctor workforce.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Postgraduate; continuous professional development; doctor’s morale and wellbeing; qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30963774      PMCID: PMC6512174          DOI: 10.1177/0141076819831872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

Review 1.  Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog?

Authors:  R S Barbour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-05

Review 2.  Understanding the stresses and strains of being a doctor.

Authors:  Geoffrey J Riley
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2004-10-04       Impact factor: 7.738

3.  Why UK-trained doctors leave the UK: cross-sectional survey of doctors in New Zealand.

Authors:  Avinash Sharma; Trevor W Lambert; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Burnout and engagement among resident doctors in the Netherlands: a national study.

Authors:  Jelle T Prins; Josette E H M Hoekstra-Weebers; Stacey M Gazendam-Donofrio; Gea S Dillingh; Arnold B Bakker; Mark Huisman; Bram Jacobs; Frank M M A van der Heijden
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Why doctors consider leaving UK medicine: qualitative analysis of comments from questionnaire surveys three years after graduation.

Authors:  Trevor W Lambert; Fay Smith; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Doctors' views about training and future careers expressed one year after graduation by UK-trained doctors: questionnaire surveys undertaken in 2009 and 2010.

Authors:  Jenny J Maisonneuve; Trevor W Lambert; Michael J Goldacre
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Stick or twist? Career decision-making during contractual uncertainty for NHS junior doctors.

Authors:  S Spooner; Jon Gibson; Dan Rigby; Matt Sutton; Emma Pearson; Kath Checkland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Retention in the British National Health Service of medical graduates trained in Britain: cohort studies.

Authors:  Michael J Goldacre; Jean M Davidson; Trevor W Lambert
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-06-03

Review 9.  Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; John Witton; Diana R Elbourne
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Associations between perceived institutional support, job enjoyment, and intentions to work in the United Kingdom: national questionnaire survey of first year doctors.

Authors:  Shelly Lachish; Michael J Goldacre; Trevor Lambert
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 2.463

View more
  5 in total

1.  NICE values, essential values.

Authors:  Kamran Abbasi
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Returning to clinical work and doctors' personal, social and organisational needs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chris Attoe; Raluca Matei; Laura Thompson; Kevin Teoh; Sean Cross; Tom Cox
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.006

3.  Are there differences between those doctors who apply for a training post in Foundation Year 2 and those who take time out of the training pathway? A UK multicohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer Cleland; Gordon Prescott; Kim Walker; Peter Johnston; Ben Kumwenda
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-24       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Reinventing Undergraduate Clinical Placements with a Switch to Delivery by Clinical Teaching Fellows.

Authors:  Sabir Hossain; Shilen Shah; Jonathan Scott; Abigail Dunn; Alexander W Hartland; Sonia Hudson; Jo-Anne Johnson
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-12-11

Review 5.  Factors affecting the UK junior doctor workforce retention crisis: an integrative review.

Authors:  Florence Katie Lock; Daniele Carrieri
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.