| Literature DB >> 30963644 |
Mario Olivieri1, Nicola Murgia2, Anne-Elie Carsin3, Joachim Heinrich4, Geza Benke5, Roberto Bono6, Angelo Guido Corsico7, Pascal Demoly8, Bertil Forsberg9, Thorarinn Gislason10, Christer Janson11, Rain Jõgi12, Bénédicte Leynaert13, Jesús Martínez-Moratalla Rovira14, Dan Norbäck15, Dennis Nowak16, Silvia Pascual17, Isabelle Pin18, Nicole Probst-Hensch19, Chantal Raherison20, Torben Sigsgaard21, Cecilie Svanes22, Kjell Torén23, Isabel Urrutia17, Joost Weyler24, Deborah Jarvis25, Jan-Paul Zock3, Giuseppe Verlato26.
Abstract
This longitudinal study investigated whether smoking bans influence passive smoking at work and/or at home in the same subjects. Passive smoking at work and/or at home was investigated in random population samples (European Community Respiratory Health Survey) in 1990-1995, with follow-up interviews in 1998-2003 and 2010-2014. National smoking bans were classified as partial (restricted to public workplaces) or global (extended to private workplaces). Multivariable analysis was accomplished by three-level logistic regression models, where level-1, level-2, and level-3 units were, respectively, questionnaire responses, subjects, and centers. Passive smoking at work was reported by 31.9% in 1990-1995, 17.5% in 1998-2003, and 2.5% in 2010-2014. Concurrently, passive smoking at home decreased from 28.9% to 18.2% and 8.8%. When controlling for sex, age, education, smoking status, and ECHRS wave, the odds of passive smoking at work was markedly reduced after global smoking bans (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.81), particularly among non-smokers, while the protective effect of global smoking bans on passive smoking at home was only detected in non-smokers. Smoking bans both in public and private workplaces were effective in reducing passive smoking at work in Europe. However, given the inefficacy of smoking bans in current smokers' dwellings, better strategies are needed to avoid smoking indoors.Entities:
Keywords: follow-up study; home environment; secondhand smoke; smoking restriction; social settings; workplace
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30963644 DOI: 10.1111/ina.12556
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indoor Air ISSN: 0905-6947 Impact factor: 5.770