Literature DB >> 30963437

Development of anatomically and lesion contrast-guided partial volume correction: new 3D formalisms and validation in phantom and clinical studies.

Hesham Abdel Gawad1, Magdy M Khalil2, Medhat W Shafaa3, Shaban Al Ramlawy4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to correct for partial volume effect in positron emission imaging studies which is the most influential factors using three-dimensional (3D) representation of the recovery coefficients (RCs) to improve standardized uptake value (SUV) calculations.
METHODS: Several phantom studies were conducted at significantly wide range of lesion contrast, range 2:1 up to 15:1. It was then classified into two groups: one for generating 3D function taking into consideration the sphere size as well lesion contrast whereas the other group was used for functions validation. A segmentation threshold algorithm for lesion delineation and volume determination was generated based on lesion contrast and lesion size. In addition, five 3D functions of the RC of the SUV were formulated considering lesion size and lesion contrast. Validation of the new algorithms has considered both phantom and clinical studies.
RESULTS: The error in threshold 3D function was well below 10%. For lesions ≤ 2 cm in diameter, there was no statistical difference of the functions developed for SUVmax as well as those functions generated for SUVmean. However, the median SUVmax has increased significantly when compared with data before correction. For SUVmean, the increase in median value was also significantly high.
CONCLUSION: It has been successful to generate 3D mathematical formulations of the SUV RC taking into consideration the most influential factors including lesion size and lesion contrast. Validation studies were suggestive of the good performance of the new mathematical algorithms generated to correct for PVE. However, further studies are underway to ensure the performance of the proposed algorithms in clinical PET studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Partial volume correction; Positron emission tomography–computed tomography; Recovery coefficient; Standardized uptake value

Year:  2019        PMID: 30963437     DOI: 10.1007/s12149-019-01356-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Nucl Med        ISSN: 0914-7187            Impact factor:   2.668


  3 in total

Review 1.  Quantitative imaging biomarkers in nuclear medicine: from SUV to image mining studies. Highlights from annals of nuclear medicine 2018.

Authors:  Martina Sollini; Francesco Bandera; Margarita Kirienko
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Computational approaches to detect small lesions in 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans.

Authors:  Kenneth J Nichols; Frank P DiFilippo; Christopher J Palestro
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 2.102

3.  Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Eman M Badawe; Hesham Abdel Gawad; Mohamed S El-Nagdy; Magdy M Khalil
Journal:  Eur J Hybrid Imaging       Date:  2022-10-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.