Ellen N Kersh1, Vanessa Allen2, Eric Ransom3, Matthew Schmerer1, Sancta Cyr1, Kim Workowski1,4, Hillard Weinstock1, Jean Patel5, Mary Jane Ferraro6,7. 1. Division of STD Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 2. Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Canada. 3. Association of Public Health Laboratories, Silver Spring, Maryland. 4. Emory University, Department of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia. 5. Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. 6. Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston. 7. Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Azithromycin (AZI) is recommended with ceftriaxone (CRO) for treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis and cervicitis in the United States, and an AZI-susceptibility breakpoint is needed. Neither the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nor the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has set interpretive breakpoints for AZI susceptibility. As a result, AZI antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) cannot be interpreted using recognized standards. This has contributed to increasingly unavailable clinical laboratory AST, although gonorrhea is on the rise with >550 000 US gonorrhea cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2017, the highest number of cases since 1991. METHODS: This article summarizes the rationale data reviewed by the CLSI in June 2018. RESULTS: The CLSI decided to set a susceptible-only interpretive breakpoint at the minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤1 µg/mL. This is also the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) (ie, the end of the wild-type susceptibility distribution). This breakpoint presumes that AZI (1-g single dose) is used in an approved regimen that includes an additional antimicrobial agent (ie, CRO 250 mg, intramuscular single dose). CONCLUSIONS: Having a breakpoint can improve patient care and surveillance and allow future development and FDA regulatory approval of modernized AST to guide treatment. The breakpoint coincides with a European Committee on AST decision to remove previously established, differing AZI breakpoints and use the ECV as guidance for testing. The CLSI breakpoint is now the recognized standard that defines AZI susceptibility for gonococcal infections. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2019.
BACKGROUND:Azithromycin (AZI) is recommended with ceftriaxone (CRO) for treatment of uncomplicated gonococcal urethritis and cervicitis in the United States, and an AZI-susceptibility breakpoint is needed. Neither the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) nor the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has set interpretive breakpoints for AZI susceptibility. As a result, AZI antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) cannot be interpreted using recognized standards. This has contributed to increasingly unavailable clinical laboratory AST, although gonorrhea is on the rise with >550 000 US gonorrhea cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in 2017, the highest number of cases since 1991. METHODS: This article summarizes the rationale data reviewed by the CLSI in June 2018. RESULTS: The CLSI decided to set a susceptible-only interpretive breakpoint at the minimum inhibitory concentration of ≤1 µg/mL. This is also the epidemiological cutoff value (ECV) (ie, the end of the wild-type susceptibility distribution). This breakpoint presumes that AZI (1-g single dose) is used in an approved regimen that includes an additional antimicrobial agent (ie, CRO 250 mg, intramuscular single dose). CONCLUSIONS: Having a breakpoint can improve patient care and surveillance and allow future development and FDA regulatory approval of modernized AST to guide treatment. The breakpoint coincides with a European Committee on AST decision to remove previously established, differing AZI breakpoints and use the ECV as guidance for testing. The CLSI breakpoint is now the recognized standard that defines AZI susceptibility for gonococcal infections. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2019.
Authors: Robert D Kirkcaldy; Alesia Harvey; John R Papp; Carlos Del Rio; Olusegun O Soge; King K Holmes; Edward W Hook; Grace Kubin; Stefan Riedel; Jonathan Zenilman; Kevin Pettus; Tremeka Sanders; Samera Sharpe; Elizabeth Torrone Journal: MMWR Surveill Summ Date: 2016-07-15
Authors: Melanie Bissessor; David M Whiley; Christopher K Fairley; Catriona S Bradshaw; David M Lee; Anthony S Snow; Monica M Lahra; Jane S Hocking; Marcus Y Chen Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: M A Pfaller; D J Diekema; M A Ghannoum; J H Rex; B D Alexander; D Andes; S D Brown; V Chaturvedi; A Espinel-Ingroff; C L Fowler; E M Johnson; C C Knapp; M R Motyl; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; D J Sheehan; T J Walsh Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2009-08-19 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Catherine A McLean; Susan A Wang; Gerald L Hoff; Lesha Y Dennis; David L Trees; Joan S Knapp; Lauri E Markowitz; William C Levine Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Ellen N Kersh; Cau D Pham; John R Papp; Robert Myers; Richard Steece; Grace Kubin; Romesh Gautom; Evelyn E Nash; Samera Sharpe; Kim M Gernert; Matthew Schmerer; Brian H Raphael; Tara Henning; Anne M Gaynor; Olusegun Soge; Karen Schlanger; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Sancta B St Cyr; Elizabeth A Torrone; Kyle Bernstein; Hillard Weinstock Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2020-03-25 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Meinan Lyu; Mitchell A Moseng; Jennifer L Reimche; Concerta L Holley; Vijaya Dhulipala; Chih-Chia Su; William M Shafer; Edward W Yu Journal: mBio Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 7.867
Authors: Leonor Sánchez-Busó; Corin A Yeats; Benjamin Taylor; Richard J Goater; Anthony Underwood; Khalil Abudahab; Silvia Argimón; Kevin C Ma; Tatum D Mortimer; Daniel Golparian; Michelle J Cole; Yonatan H Grad; Irene Martin; Brian H Raphael; William M Shafer; Katy Town; Teodora Wi; Simon R Harris; Magnus Unemo; David M Aanensen Journal: Genome Med Date: 2021-04-19 Impact factor: 11.117
Authors: Kim M Gernert; Sandra Seby; Matthew W Schmerer; Jesse C Thomas; Cau D Pham; Sancta St Cyr; Karen Schlanger; Hillard Weinstock; William M Shafer; Brian H Raphael; Ellen N Kersh Journal: Lancet Microbe Date: 2020-08
Authors: Magnus N Osnes; Xavier Didelot; Jolinda de Korne-Elenbaas; Kristian Alfsnes; Ola B Brynildsrud; Gaute Syversen; Øivind Jul Nilsen; Birgitte Freiesleben De Blasio; Dominique A Caugant; Vegard Eldholm Journal: Microb Genom Date: 2020-11-17
Authors: Kevin C Ma; Tatum D Mortimer; Allison L Hicks; Nicole E Wheeler; Leonor Sánchez-Busó; Daniel Golparian; George Taiaroa; Daniel H F Rubin; Yi Wang; Deborah A Williamson; Magnus Unemo; Simon R Harris; Yonatan H Grad Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Kevin C Ma; Tatum D Mortimer; Marissa A Duckett; Allison L Hicks; Nicole E Wheeler; Leonor Sánchez-Busó; Yonatan H Grad Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 14.919