| Literature DB >> 30962558 |
Clément Zanolli1,2, Ottmar Kullmer3,4, Jay Kelley5,6,7, Anne-Marie Bacon8, Fabrice Demeter9,10, Jean Dumoncel11, Luca Fiorenza12,13, Frederick E Grine14, Jean-Jacques Hublin15, Anh Tuan Nguyen16, Thi Mai Huong Nguyen16, Lei Pan17,18, Burkhard Schillinger19, Friedemann Schrenk3,4, Matthew M Skinner15,20, Xueping Ji21,22, Roberto Macchiarelli23,24.
Abstract
Since the first discovery of Pithecanthropus (Homo) erectus by E. Dubois at Trinil in 1891, over 200 hominid dentognathic remains have been collected from the Early to Middle Pleistocene deposits of Java, Indonesia, forming the largest palaeoanthropological collection in South East Asia. Most of these fossils are currently attributed to H. erectus. However, because of the substantial morphological and metric variation in the Indonesian assemblage, some robust specimens, such as the partial mandibles Sangiran 5 and Sangiran 6a, were formerly variably allocated to other taxa (Meganthropus palaeojavanicus, Pithecanthropus dubius, Pongo sp.). To resolve the taxonomic uncertainty surrounding these and other contentious Indonesian hominid specimens, we used occlusal fingerprint analysis (OFA) to reconstruct their chewing kinematics; we also used various morphometric approaches based on microtomography to examine the internal dental structures. Our results confirm the presence of Meganthropus as a Pleistocene Indonesian hominid distinct from Pongo, Gigantopithecus and Homo, and further reveal that Dubois's H. erectus paratype molars from 1891 are not hominin (human lineage), but instead are more likely to belong to Meganthropus.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30962558 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-0860-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Ecol Evol ISSN: 2397-334X Impact factor: 15.460