Yvonne M Ende-Verhaar1, Lilian J Meijboom2, Lucia J M Kroft3, Ludo F M Beenen4, Gudula J A M Boon1, Saskia Middeldorp5, Esther J Nossent6, Petr Symersky7, Menno V Huisman1, Harm Jan Bogaard6, Anton Vonk Noordegraaf6, Frederikus A Klok8. 1. Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. 4. Departments of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 5. Departments of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Amsterdam University Medical Center, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 6. Departments of Pulmonology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 7. Departments of Cardiac Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Department of Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: f.a.klok@LUMC.nl.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is often diagnosed after a long delay, even though signs may already be present on the computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) used to diagnose a preceding acute pulmonary embolism (PE). In this setting of suspected acute PE, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of dedicated CTPA reading for the diagnosis of already existing CTEPH. METHODS: Three blinded expert radiologists scored radiologic signs of CTEPH on initial CTPA scans with confirmed acute PE in 50 patients who were subsequently diagnosed with CTEPH during follow-up (cases), and in 50 patients in whom sequential echocardiograms performed >2 years after the acute PE diagnosis did not show any signs of pulmonary hypertension (controls). All 50 control index CTPA scans had signs of right ventricular (RV) overload. Sensitivity and specificity of expert CTPA reading was calculated, and best-predicting radiologic parameters were identified. RESULTS: The overall expert reading yielded a sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58%-84%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 83%-99%) for CTEPH diagnosis. Multivariate analysis identified 6 radiologic parameters as independent predictors: intravascular webs; pulmonary artery retraction or dilatation; bronchial artery dilatation; right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy; and interventricular septum flattening. The presence of 3 or more these parameters was associated with a sensitivity of 70% (95% CI 55%-82%), a specificity of 96% (95% CI 86%-100%), and a c-statistic of 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized reading of CTPA scans performed for acute PE can be useful for the diagnosis of CTEPH when structured identification of 6 characteristics is employed during interpretation. The use of this strategy may help reduce diagnostic delay of CTEPH.
BACKGROUND:Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is often diagnosed after a long delay, even though signs may already be present on the computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) used to diagnose a preceding acute pulmonary embolism (PE). In this setting of suspected acute PE, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of dedicated CTPA reading for the diagnosis of already existing CTEPH. METHODS: Three blinded expert radiologists scored radiologic signs of CTEPH on initial CTPA scans with confirmed acute PE in 50 patients who were subsequently diagnosed with CTEPH during follow-up (cases), and in 50 patients in whom sequential echocardiograms performed >2 years after the acute PE diagnosis did not show any signs of pulmonary hypertension (controls). All 50 control index CTPA scans had signs of right ventricular (RV) overload. Sensitivity and specificity of expert CTPA reading was calculated, and best-predicting radiologic parameters were identified. RESULTS: The overall expert reading yielded a sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval [CI] 58%-84%) and a specificity of 94% (95% CI 83%-99%) for CTEPH diagnosis. Multivariate analysis identified 6 radiologic parameters as independent predictors: intravascular webs; pulmonary artery retraction or dilatation; bronchial artery dilatation; right ventricular (RV) hypertrophy; and interventricular septum flattening. The presence of 3 or more these parameters was associated with a sensitivity of 70% (95% CI 55%-82%), a specificity of 96% (95% CI 86%-100%), and a c-statistic of 0.92. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized reading of CTPA scans performed for acute PE can be useful for the diagnosis of CTEPH when structured identification of 6 characteristics is employed during interpretation. The use of this strategy may help reduce diagnostic delay of CTEPH.
Authors: Jan Robert Kroeger; Jakob Zöllner; Felix Gerhardt; Stephan Rosenkranz; Roman Johannes Gertz; Shir Kerszenblat; Gregor Pahn; David Maintz; Alexander C Bunck Journal: Quant Imaging Med Surg Date: 2022-02
Authors: Gudula J A M Boon; Nienke van Rein; Harm Jan Bogaard; Yvonne M Ende-Verhaar; Menno V Huisman; Lucia J M Kroft; Felix J M van der Meer; Lilian J Meijboom; Petr Symersky; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Frederikus A Klok Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Micheal C McInnis; David Wang; Laura Donahoe; John Granton; John Thenganatt; Kongteng Tan; John Kavanagh; Marc de Perrot Journal: ERJ Open Res Date: 2020-12-07
Authors: Frederikus A Klok; Walter Ageno; Cihan Ay; Magnus Bäck; Stefano Barco; Laurent Bertoletti; Cecilia Becattini; Jørn Carlsen; Marion Delcroix; Nick van Es; Menno V Huisman; Luis Jara-Palomares; Stavros Konstantinides; Irene Lang; Guy Meyer; Fionnuala Ní Áinle; Stephan Rosenkranz; Piotr Pruszczyk Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Isabelle Opitz; Miriam Patella; Olivia Lauk; Ilhan Inci; Dominique Bettex; Thomas Horisberger; Reto Schüpbach; Dagmar I Keller; Thomas Frauenfelder; Nils Kucher; John Granton; Thomas Pfammatter; Marc de Perrot; Silvia Ulrich Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-07-21 Impact factor: 4.964