| Literature DB >> 30961181 |
Fabrizio Sarasini1, Francesca Luzi2, Franco Dominici3, Gianluca Maffei4, Annalaura Iannone5, Antonio Zuorro6, Roberto Lavecchia7, Luigi Torre8, Alfredo Carbonell-Verdu9, Rafael Balart10, Debora Puglia11.
Abstract
This work investigates the feasibility of using coffee silverskin (CSS), one of the most abundant coffee waste products, as a reinforcing agent in biopolymer-based composites. The effect of using two compatibilizers, a maleinized linseed oil (MLO) and a traditional silane (APTES, (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane), on mechanical and thermal behavior of sustainable composites based on a poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate/Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) PBAT/PHBV blend filled with coffee silverskin, in both the as-received state and after the extraction of antioxidants, was studied. Thermal (by differential scanning calorimetry), mechanical (by tensile testing), and morphological properties (by scanning electron microscopy) of injection molded biocomposites at three different weight contents (10, 20, and 30 wt %) were considered and discussed as a function of compatibilizer type. The effects of extraction procedure and silane treatment on surface properties of CSS were investigated by infrared spectroscopy. Obtained results confirmed that extracted CSS and silane-treated CSS provided the best combination of resistance properties and ductility, while MLO provided a limited compatibilization effect with CSS, due to the reduced amount of hydroxyl groups on CSS after extraction, suggesting that the effects of silane modification were more significant than the introduction of plasticizing agent.Entities:
Keywords: biodegradable composites; coffee silverskin; plasticizers; poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate); poly(butyleneadipate-co-terephthalate; recycling; silane; sustainable development
Year: 2018 PMID: 30961181 PMCID: PMC6401751 DOI: 10.3390/polym10111256
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Summary of the formulations investigated in the present study.
| Specimen ID | Matrix (PBAT/PHBV) (wt %) | As-received CSS (wt %) | Extracted CSS (wt %) | Maleinized Linseed Oil (wt %) | Silane- Treated CSS (wt %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neat blend | 100 | - | - | - | - |
| Blend_10CSS_N | 90 | 10 | - | - | - |
| Blend_20CSS_N | 80 | 20 | - | - | - |
| Blend_30CSS_N | 70 | 30 | - | - | - |
| Blend_10CSS_T | 90 | - | 10 | - | - |
| Blend_20CSS_T | 80 | - | 20 | - | - |
| Blend_30CSS_T | 70 | - | 30 | - | - |
| Blend_MLO | 97 | - | - | 3 | - |
| Blend_10CSST_M | 87 | - | 10 | 3 | - |
| Blend_20CSST_M | 77 | - | 20 | 3 | - |
| Blend_30CSST_M | 67 | - | 30 | 3 | - |
| Blend_10CSST_S | 90 | - | - | - | 10 |
| Blend_20CSST_S | 80 | - | - | - | 20 |
| Blend_30CSST_S | 70 | - | - | - | 30 |
Figure 1Derivative thermograms (DTG) curves (a) and Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectra (b) of as received, treated, and silane-treated coffee silverskin (CSS).
Figure 2SEM micrographs of (a,b) as-received and (c,d) extracted CSS.
Figure 3Typical stress–strain curves from tensile tests of PBAT/PHBV-based composites with non-compatibilized CSS.
Summary of tensile properties for PBAT/PHBV-based composites.
| Specimen ID | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Young’s Modulus (MPa) | Strain at Failure (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neat blend | 12.90 ± 0.83 | 429 ± 30 | 5.92 ± 0.54 |
| Blend_10CSS_N | 13.70 ± 0.44 | 663 ± 62 | 4.56 ± 0.15 |
| Blend_20CSS_N | 14.33 ± 0.15 | 1164 ± 133 | 3.25 ± 0.26 |
| Blend_30CSS_N | 13.52 ± 0.31 | 1432 ± 118 | 1.80 ± 0.27 |
| Blend_10CSS_T | 14.82 ± 0.26 | 1015 ± 70 | 3.57 ± 0.39 |
| Blend_20CSS_T | 15.30 ± 0.19 | 1503 ± 52 | 2.45 ± 0.14 |
| Blend_30CSS_T | 15.01 ± 0.75 | 1902 ± 101 | 1.55 ± 0.32 |
| Blend_MLO | 9.88 ± 0.27 | 394 ± 11 | 3.67 ± 0.16 |
| Blend_10CSST_M | 12.86 ± 0.41 | 656 ± 69 | 2.91 ± 0.09 |
| Blend_20CSST_M | 13.32 ± 0.28 | 1317 ± 84 | 2.14 ± 0.36 |
| Blend_30CSST_M | 13.08 ± 0.37 | 1331 ± 80 | 2.24 ± 0.12 |
| Blend_10CSST_S | 13.74 ± 0.34 | 617 ± 13 | 5.07 ± 0.57 |
| Blend_20CSST_S | 14.71 ± 0.22 | 1034 ± 39 | 3.76 ± 0.20 |
| Blend_30CSST_S | 15.38 ± 0.11 | 1566 ± 51 | 2.26 ± 0.09 |
Figure 4SEM micrographs of biocomposites with 30 wt % CSS in the as-received state (a) and with 30 wt % CSS after extraction (b) at different magnifications.
Figure 5Typical stress–strain curves from tensile tests of PBAT/PHBV-based composites with extracted CSS (a); silane-treated CSS (b); and maleinized linseed oil (MLO) modifier (c) at different CSS contents.
Figure 6SEM micrographs of the polymer blend compatibilized with MLO at different magnifications.
Figure 7SEM micrographs of biocomposites with 30 wt % CSS after extraction and MLO at different magnifications.
Figure 8SEM micrographs of biocomposites with 30 wt % CSS after extraction and surface modification with silane at different magnifications.
Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results of PBAT/PHBV blend-based formulations.
| Specimen ID | Cooling Scan | Second Heating Scan | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ | Tc PHBV (°C) | Δ | Δ | Δ | Δ | |||||||
|
| 72.1 ± 1.3 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 117.9 ± 1.2 | 4.0 ± 0.1 | 43.0 ± 1.2 | 9.0 ± 0.5 | 129.6 ± 1.2 | 6.4 ± 0.3 | 160.2 ± 0.8 | 169.3 ± 0.5 | 23.8 ± 1.1 | 38.7 ± 0.5 |
|
| 69.4 ± 1.1 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 117.7 ± 1.3 | 4.5 ± 0.2 | 43.0 ± 1.1 | 10.1 ± 0.6 | 127.8 ± 1.1 | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 160.3 ± 0.8 | 169.1 ± 0.9 | 23.4 ± 0.8 | 38.8 ± 0.4 |
|
| 64.5 ± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 116.0 ± 1.2 | 4.0 ± 0.2 | 44.2 ± 1.1 | 5.3 ± 0.3 | 129.2 ± 0.9 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 162.9 ± 0.5 | 171.4 ± 0.8 | 19.7 ± 1.2 | 47.4 ± 0.6 |
|
| 66.1 ± 0.6 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 115.1 ± 1.1 | 3.9 ± 0.3 | 44.6 ± 1.2 | 6.1 ± 0.4 | 130.3 ± 1.3 | 4.4 ± 0.2 | 160.3 ± 0.4 | 169.8 ± 0.4 | 18.2 ± 1.2 | 45.2 ± 0.7 |
|
| 68.13 ± 0.4 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 116.4 ± 1.2 | 3.5 ± 0.2 | 42.7± 0.5 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | 129.2 ± 1.2 | 3.2 ± 0.3 | 163.0 ± 0.9 | 171.0 ± 0.5 | 20.9 ± 0.4 | 50.6 ± 0.8 |
|
| 66.0 ± 0.3 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 116.9 ± 1.5 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 42.8 ± 0.2 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 129.7 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 161.9 ± 1.2 | 170.5 ± 0.4 | 18.4 ± 0.2 | 50.3 ± 1.5 |
|
| 79.9 ± 1.2 | 4.7 ± 0.5 | 116.5 ± 1.5 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 43.9 ± 0.4 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 130.2 ± 1.5 | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 162.7 ± 1.1 | 170.7 ± 0.5 | 17.2 ± 0.4 | 56.7 ± 2.2 |
|
| 72.3 ± 0.6 | 5.1 ± 0.5 | 117.9 ± 1.8 | 2.9 ± 0.2 | 43.1 ± 0.5 | 4.3 ± 0.3 | 128.7 ± 0.8 | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 162.3 ± 1.3 | 170.2 ± 1.1 | 22.6 ± 0.4 | 49.5 ± 1.8 |
|
| 77.8 ± 0.2 | 8.6 ± 0.7 | 116.1 ± 0.5 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 43.5 ± 0.4 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 126.8 ± 1.1 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 162.7 ± 0.4 | 170.7 ± 1.2 | 18.8 ± 0.5 | 51.1 ± 1.7 |
|
| 75.8 ± 0.3 | 6.8 ± 0.4 | 115.7 ± 0.7 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 43.7 ± 0.7 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 128.0 ± 1.2 | 3.8 ± 0.5 | 162.5 ± 0.5 | 170.4 ± 0.7 | 17.9 ± 0.6 | 55.9 ± 2.3 |
|
| 79.9 ± 0.4 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 116.5 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 44.4 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.1 | 129.4 ± 0.4 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 163.3 ± 0.6 | 170.7 ± 0.5 | 17.3 ± 0.3 | 59.3 ± 2.5 |
|
| 70.7 ± 1.2 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 117.1 ± 1.1 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 41.7 ± 0.4 | 5.9 ± 0.3 | 129.7 ± 0.4 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | 162.1 ± 0.5 | 170.9 ± 0.5 | 22.2 ± 1.1 | 47.4 ± 2.4 |
|
| 70.7 ± 1.5 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 117.2 ± 1.2 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 41.7 ± 0.8 | 3.8 ± 0.2 | 129.2 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 0.2 | 163.0 ± 0.8 | 170.6 ± 0.7 | 21.0 ± 1.2 | 56.1 ± 2.7 |
|
| 73.4 ± 1.2 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 118.5 ± 1.5 | 3.1 ± 0.2 | 41.4 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 131.8 ± 1.1 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | 163.3 ± 0.6 | 170.7 ± 0.4 | 18.2 ± 0.5 | 63.2 ± 2.4 |
Figure 9DSC curves for neat PBAT/PBVH and blend_10CSS based composites (Panel A) and for neat PBAT/PBVH, blend_MLO and blend_CSST_M based composites (Panel B) during cooling (a) and second heating (b) scans.