| Literature DB >> 30961043 |
Yuchen Mao1,2, Takuya Miyazaki3, Kohei Sakai4, Jin Gong5,6, Meifang Zhu7, Hiroshi Ito8.
Abstract
Most of the phase change materials (PCMs) have been limited to use as functional additions or sealed in containers, and extra auxiliary equipment or supporting matrix is needed. The emergence of 3D printing technique has dramatically advanced the developments of materials and simplified production processes. This study focuses on a novel strategy to model thermal energy storage crystalline gels with three-dimensional architecture directly from liquid resin without supporting materials through light-inducedEntities:
Keywords: 3D printing; crystalline gel; mask-projection stereolithography; phase change material; thermal energy storage; thermoregulation
Year: 2018 PMID: 30961043 PMCID: PMC6404010 DOI: 10.3390/polym10101117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Synthesis scheme of the thermal energy storage crystalline P(SA-DMAA) gel. A light-induced random polymerization is processed between phase change monomer SA and another vinyl monomer DMAA with crosslinker MBAA at the aid of co-initiator system ITX-EDAB.
Figure 2The schematics of mask-projection stereolithography for bottom-up system (left) and top-down system (right). The light source is scanning laser or digital light projection.
Figure 3LumiForge, a mask-projection stereolithography 3D printer working from a bottom-up principle; its light source is provided by a projector.
Figure 4The 3D sheet model designed by 123D Design (a); P(SA-DMAA) gel sheet of 3DP 0.25 (printed on LumiForge) (b); Post-UV 3DP 0.25 (after post-UV treatment) (c); and Mold 0.25 (e); prepared using conventional mold (d).
Figure 5Characters “YU” printed on LumiForge under the same condition with different molar ratios of SA to DMAA at 0.50:1.00 (3DP 0.50) (a), 0.33:1.00 (3DP 0.33) (b) and 0.25:1.00 (3DP 0.25) (c). The printing performances improved with the decreasing molar fraction of SA.
Figure 63D model data designed using the 123D Design software, and 3D objects fabricated on LumiForge with more complex shapes of honeycomb (a) and tentacle (b). The printed objects had high printing precision both on milli- and micro- meter scales.
Figure 7Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometer (FTIR) spectra of P(SA-DMAA) gels and their partial enlargement around 1000 cm−1. (a) DMAA, (b) P(DMAA), (c) SA, (d) P(SA), (e) 3DP 0.50, (f) 3DP 0.33, (g) 3DP 0.25, (h) Post-UV 3DP 0.50, (i) Post-UV 3DP 0.33, (j) Post-UV 3DP 0.25, (k) Mold 0.50, (l) Mold 3DP 0.33, (m) Mold 3DP 0.25.
Figure 8Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) patterns of thermal energy storage P(SA-DMAA) gels prepared with different methods and from different SA molar fractions. The high peak intensity represents the high crystallinity. Although no obvious influence of different methods on crystallinity was observed, the increasing amount of SA led to higher crystallinity.
The degree of crystallinity (Wc) evaluated from WAXS patterns for P(SA-DMAA) gels.
| Sample | Sample | Sample | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mold 0.50 | 39.16 | 3DP 0.50 | 41.24 | Post-UV 3DP 0.50 | 41.52 |
| Mold 0.33 | 27.61 | 3DP 0.33 | 28.79 | Post-UV 3DP 0.33 | 26.30 |
| Mold 0.25 | 19.05 | 3DP 0.25 | 23.57 | Post-UV 3DP 0.25 | 22.52 |
Figure 9Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) curves of thermal energy storage crystalline P(SA-DMAA) gels prepared from 3D printing (a), 3D printing with post-UV curing treatment (b), and curing with conventional UV mold (c).
Phase transition temperatures and phase change enthalpies measured by DSC for P(SA-DMAA) gels.
| Sample | Δ | Δ | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3DP 0.50 | 29.78 | 69.22 | 35.88 | 69.58 |
| 3DP 0.33 | 25.27 | 37.65 | 33.16 | 41.24 |
| 3DP 0.25 | 23.55 | 12.04 | 32.67 | 13.49 |
| Post-UV 3DP 0.50 | 30.10 | 53.01 | 39.88 | 56.68 |
| Post-UV 3DP 0.33 | 26.89 | 23.53 | 37.32 | 23.95 |
| Post-UV 3DP 0.25 | 24.48 | 11.54 | 37.76 | 11.71 |
| Mold 0.50 | 35.03 | 53.73 | 41.66 | 53.42 |
| Mold 0.33 | 28.01 | 36.12 | 39.56 | 34.48 |
| Mold 0.25 | 28.01 | 9.54 | 39.00 | 10.58 |
Tc: crystallization temperature, ΔHc: enthalpy of crystallization process, Tm: melting temperature, ΔHm: enthalpy of melting process.
Figure 10The logo of Yamagata University (a), the printed logo on cotton fabric using P(SA-DMAA) gel (3DP 0.25) as printing material on LumiForge (b), and its infrared thermal picture supplied by an infrared thermal graphic camera shown thermal energy storage capacity (c).
Figure 11Temperature change as a function of time detected by an infrared thermal graphic camera for 3D printed crystalline P(SA-DMAA) gels in one heating (a) and cooling (b) cycle. A buffer zone and the temperature differences between 3DP gel samples and hot stage were clearly observed.