| Literature DB >> 30960920 |
Shengnan Lv1,2, Xin Zhao3, Lei Shi4, Gaokai Zhang5, Shubo Wang6, Weimin Kang7, Xupin Zhuang8,9.
Abstract
Particulate matter (PM) pollution is a serious concern for the environment and public health. To protect indoor air quality, nanofiber filters have been used to coat window screens due to their high PM removal efficiency, transparency and low air resistance. However, these materials have poor mechanical property. In this study, electrostatic induction-assisted solution blowing was used to fabricate polylactide stereocomplex (sc-PLA), which served as reinforcement to enhance the physical cross-linking point to significantly restrict poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) molecular chain motion and improve the mechanical properties of sc-PLA/PMMA nanofibers. Moreover, the introduction of sc-PLA led to the formation of thick/thin composite nanofiber structure, which is beneficial for the mechanical property. Thus, sc-PLA/PMMA air filters of ~83% transparency with 99.5% PM2.5 removal and 140% increase in mechanical properties were achieved when 5 wt % sc-PLA was added to PMMA. Hence, the addition of sc-PLA to transparent filters can effectively improve their performance.Entities:
Keywords: PM2.5; air filtration; mechanical properties; nanofibers; optical properties; solution blowing
Year: 2018 PMID: 30960920 PMCID: PMC6403596 DOI: 10.3390/polym10090996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic of the preparation of transparent air filter material by electrostatic induction-assisted solution blowing.
Figure 2SEM micrographs and diameter distributions of the sc-PLA/PMMA nanofibers with sc-PLA contents of (a) 0 wt %, (b) 5 wt %, (c) 10 wt %, (d) 15 wt %, (e) 20 wt % and (f) 25 wt %.
Figure 3Analysis of the fabrication of sc-PLA in PMMA. (a) DSC melting curves for the different samples with various sc-PLA contents. (b1) TEM images for sc-PLA/PMMA nanofibers with 20 wt % sc-PLA contents. (b2) EDS mapping of aluminum. (c) Change of viscosity with shear rate for various sc-PLA contents.
Figure 4Stress–strain curves of sc-PLA/PMMA nanofiber filter with different contents of sc-PLA.
Figure 5Transmittance of sc-PLA/PMMA nanofiber filter with different sc-PLA contents.
Figure 6Pore distribution of sc-PLA/PMMA nanofiber filter with different sc-PLA contents.
Performance summary of different air filters.
| Sample | P (%) | E (%) | ΔP (Pa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 wt % | 80 | 95.40 | 32 | 0.0962 |
| 5 wt % | 81 | 99.52 | 46 | 0.1161 |
| 10 wt % | 75 | 99.95 | 65 | 0.1169 |
| 15 wt % | 72 | 99.99 | 67 | 0.1374 |
| 20 wt % | 73 | 96.35 | 35 | 0.0966 |
Note. P, porosity; E, PM2.5 removal efficiency; ΔP, pressure drop; QF, quality factor. QF = −ln(1 − E)/ ΔP.