| Literature DB >> 30960897 |
Linfeng Lei1, Arne Lindbråthen2, Marius Sandru3, Maria Teresa Guzman Gutierrez4, Xiangping Zhang5, Magne Hillestad6, Xuezhong He7.
Abstract
The mixture of the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (EmimAc) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was employed to dissolve microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). A 10 wt % cellulose dope solution was prepared for spinning cellulose hollow fibers (CHFs) under a mild temperature of 50 °C by a dry⁻wet spinning method. The defect-free CHFs were obtained with an average diameter and thickness of 270 and 38 µm, respectively. Both the XRD and FTIR characterization confirmed that a crystalline structure transition from cellulose I (MCC) to cellulose II (regenerated CHFs) occurred during the cellulose dissolution in ionic liquids and spinning processes. The thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) indicated that regenerated CHFs presented a similar pyrolysis behavior with deacetylated cellulose acetate during pyrolysis process. This study provided a suitable way to directly fabricate hollow fiber carbon membranes using cellulose hollow fiber precursors spun from cellulose/(EmimAc + DMSO)/H₂O ternary system.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose; hollow fiber; ionic liquids; spinning; viscosity
Year: 2018 PMID: 30960897 PMCID: PMC6404078 DOI: 10.3390/polym10090972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the spinning process.
List of spinning condition.
| Spinning Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Dope flow rate, mL/min | 3.2 |
| Bore fluid flow rate, mL/min | 1.7 |
| Bore fluid composition, wt % | 60 EmimAc + 20 DMSO + 20 H2O |
| Air gap, mm | 50 |
| Take-up speed, m/min | 14.6 |
| Coagulation and rinsing bath temperature, °C | 25 ± 1 |
Figure 2FTIR spectra (a) and TGA curves (b) of 10 wt % cellulose/EmimAc solution exposed to ambient air.
Figure 3The viscosities of different cellulose/ionic liquid (IL) solutions as a function of temperature.
Figure 4Cross-sectional image of a wet CHF obtained from optical microscope.
Figure 5SEM images of (a,b) cross section of CHF; (c) outside layer of CHF; (d) inside layer of CHF.
Figure 6FTIR spectra of (a) solvents, polymer solution, MCC and CHF; (b) zoom in the range of 800-1200 cm-1 for MCC and CHF.
Figure 7The XRD patterns of MCC and CHF.
Figure 8Weight loss of MCC and CHF by TGA.