| Literature DB >> 30960628 |
Jianfeng Li1, Zezhou Liang2, Yichun Peng3, Jie Lv1, Xuying Ma4, Yufei Wang5, Yangjun Xia6.
Abstract
In recent years, ternary organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs) have been dedicated to improving power conversion efficiency (PCE) by broadening optical absorption spectra. Ternary OPVs with different poly[thieno[3,2-b]thiophene-2,5-diyl-alt-4,9-bis(4-(2-decyltetradecyl)thien-2-yl)naphtho[1,2-c:5,6-c']bis[1,2,5]thiadiazole-5,5'-diyl] (PTT-DTNT-DT) doping concentrations were designed and the effect of PTT-DTNT-DT as a complementary electron donor on the performance of OPVs was investigated. The optimized PCE of OPVs was increased from 3.42% to 4.66% by doping 20 wt % PTT-DTNT-DT. The remarkable improvement in the performance of the ternary device is mainly attributed to the sharp increase in the short-circuit current density and fill-factor. The major reasons have been systematically studied from atomic force microscopy, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, surface energy, space charge limited current and photocurrent behavior. It has been found that the separation of excitons and the transportation of charge are enhanced while light absorption is increased, and the charge recombination also decreases due to the optimization of the cascade energy level and the morphology of the ternary active layer. The results show that it is feasible to improve the performance of ternary OPVs by their complementary absorption.Entities:
Keywords: PTT-DTNT-DT; cascade energy levels; complementary absorption; ternary organic photovoltaic cells
Year: 2018 PMID: 30960628 PMCID: PMC6403668 DOI: 10.3390/polym10070703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1(a) Chemical structures of materials in active layer; (b) Device configuration of ternary OPVs.
Figure 2(a) Absorption of PTT-DTNT-DT film, Absorption and emission spectra of P3HT films; (b) Absorption of the blend films with different P3HT:PTT-DTNT-DT:PC61BM weight ratios.
Figure 3(a) Current-voltage curves of the binary and ternary devices; (b) the corresponding EQE spectra of the OPVs.
Photovoltaic parameters of the OPVs.
| P3HT:PTT-DTNT-DT:PC61BM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best | Average 2 | ||||
| 1:0:1 | 0.587 ± 0.003 | 9.47 ± 0.25 (9.62) 1 | 60.08 ± 0.89 | 3.42 | 3.34 |
| 0.90:0.10:1 | 0.576 ± 0.004 | 10.05 ± 0.23 (10.19) 1 | 60.97 ± 0.63 | 3.66 | 3.53 |
| 0.80:0.20:1 | 0.588 ± 0.002 | 12.44 ± 0.19 (12.68) 1 | 62.61 ± 0.78 | 4.66 | 4.58 |
| 0.70:0.30:1 | 0.591 ± 0.003 | 11.07 ± 0.09 (11.21) 1 | 57.62 ± 0.45 | 3.82 | 3.77 |
| 0:1:1 | 0.722 ± 0.002 | 10.96 ± 0.11 (11.19) 1 | 58.38 ± 0.42 | 4.67 | 4.62 |
1 The current in the parentheses is based on the EQE spectral integral. 2 All the parameters are based on the average of 10 devices.
Figure 4(a) Schematic diagram of energy level structure of ternary OPVs; (b) PL spectra of different proportion P3HT:PTT-DTNT-DT blend membranes.
Figure 5(a) The J − V curves and (b) P(E,T)-V curves of the OPVs with different PTT-DTNT-DT doping concentration.
Figure 6AFM 3D height images (a–e) for ternary blends of P3HT:PTT-DTNT-DT:PC61BM with 1:0:1, 0.90:0.10:1, 0.80:0.2:1, 0.70:0.30:1, and 0:1:1.