| Literature DB >> 30960356 |
Leilei Yan1,2, Wei Jiang3, Chun Zhang4, Yunwei Zhang5, Zhiheng He6, Keyu Zhu7, Niu Chen8, Wanbo Zhang9, Bin Han10,11, Xitao Zheng12.
Abstract
By the addition of a carbon-based electromagnetic absorbing agent during the foaming process, a novel electromagnetic absorbent polymethacrylimide (PMI) foam was obtained. The proposed foam exhibits excellent electromagnetic wave-absorbing properties, with absorptivity exceeding 85% at a large frequency range of 4.9⁻18 GHz. However, its poor mechanical properties would limit its application in load-carrying structures. In the present study, a novel enhancement approach is proposed by inserting metallic tubes into pre-perforated holes of PMI foam blocks. The mechanical properties of the tube-enhanced PMI foams were studied experimentally under compressive loading conditions. The elastic modulus, compressive strength, energy absorption per unit volume, and energy absorption per unit mass were increased by 127.9%, 133.8%, 54.2%, and 46.4%, respectively, by the metallic tube filling, and the density increased only by 5.3%. The failure mechanism of the foams was also explored. We found that the weaker interfaces between the foam and the electromagnetic absorbing agent induced crack initiation and subsequent collapses, which destroyed the structural integrity. The excellent mechanical and electromagnetic absorbing properties make the novel structure much more competitive in electromagnetic wave stealth applications, while acting simultaneously as load-carrying structures.Entities:
Keywords: absorbent PMI foam; electromagnetic wave absorption; failure mechanism; mechanical properties; metallic tube
Year: 2019 PMID: 30960356 PMCID: PMC6419214 DOI: 10.3390/polym11020372
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Specimen images of polymethacrylimide (PMI) foam. (a) PMI foam; (b) Tube-enhanced PMI foam; (c) Foam-filled tube-enhanced PMI foam; (d) Absorbent PMI foam; (e) Tube-enhanced absorbent PMI foam; (f) Foam-filled tube-enhanced absorbent PMI foam.
Figure 2The wave-absorbing properties of normal and absorbent PMI foams; (a) Experimental setup; (b) Experimental results of reflectivity for vertical incident waves.
Parameters of specimens for the compression tests; Al is 6061 aluminum alloy, steel is 304 stainless steel, Filled-Al is foam-filled aluminum tube, Filled-Steel is foam-filled 304 stainless steel tube.
| Specimen | Foam Type | Tube Type | Averaged Mass (g) | Tube | Specimen Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PMI Foam | None | 13.46 | None | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 |
| 2 | Al | 14.81 | 0.5 × Φ 10 mm | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 | |
| 3 | Filled-Al | 14.88 | 0.5 × Φ 10 mm | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 | |
| 4 | Steel | 15.79 | 0.2 × Φ 10 mm | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 | |
| 5 | Absorbent PMI foam | None | 14.21 | None | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 |
| 6 | Al | 14.99 | 0.5 × Φ 10 mm | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 | |
| 7 | Filled-Al | 15.04 | 0.5 × Φ 10 mm | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 | |
| 8 | Steel | 14.67 | 0.2 × Φ 10 mm | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 | |
| 9 | Filled-Steel | 14.96 | 0.2 × Φ 10 mm | 40 × 40 × 40 mm3 |
Figure 3Compressive behaviors of PMI foams. (a) Stress strain curve; (b) Energy absorption. The ellipse circles indicate classes of specimens.
Figure 4Images of PMI foams during compression. (a) PMI foam at compressive strain of 75%; (b) Absorbent PMI foam at compressive strain of 30%. The ellipse region shows where cracks occurred which subsequently caused collapse.
Figure 5Compressive behaviors of tube-enhanced PMI foams. (a) Typical stress strain curves; (b) Energy absorption per volume.
Figure 6Compressive behaviors of tube-enhanced absorbent PMI foams. (a) Typical stress–strain curves; (b) Energy absorption per volume.
Figure 7Normal PMI foam-based specimen images after compression. (a) PMI foam; (b) Tube-enhanced PMI foam; (c) Foam-filled tube-enhanced PMI foam; (d) Layer-by-layer buckling deformation of metallic tube in tube-enhanced PMI foam.
Summary of the averaged elastic modulus , compressive strength , and energy absorption per unit volume and per unit mass of the specimens as well as density .
| Specimen |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 210.3 | 318.6 | 8.90 | 3.84 | 18.26 |
| 2 | 231.4 | 386.0 | 10.31 | 4.20 | 18.15 |
| 3 | 246.7 | 566.4 | 9.14 | 4.53 | 18.36 |
| 4 | 232.5 | 354.9 | 10.53 | 4.53 | 19.48 |
| 5 | 222.0 | 231.7 | 2.96 | 1.42 | 6.40 |
| 6 | 234.2 | 338.0 | 5.14 | 2.07 | 8.84 |
| 7 | 235.0 | 373.5 | 4.94 | 1.91 | 8.13 |
| 8 | 229.2 | 479.8 | 5.44 | 1.72 | 7.50 |
| 9 | 233.8 | 525.7 | 6.92 | 2.19 | 9.37 |
Figure 8Absorbent PMI foam-based specimen images after compression. (a) Absorbent PMI foam; (b) Tube-enhanced absorbent PMI foam; (c) Foam-filled tube-enhanced absorbent PMI foam; (d) Fractography of the absorbent PMI foam showing interfaces between PMI foam and absorbing agent; (e,f) Local fracture surfaces of the absorbent PMI foam.
Figure 9Comparison of present tube-enhanced normal and absorbent PMI foams with competing sandwich core designs [36]. (a) Specific compressive strength and (b) Specific energy absorption.