| Literature DB >> 30960101 |
KeumHwan Park1, Cheolmin Shin2, Ye-Seul Song3, Hee-Jin Lee4, Chiho Shin5, Youngmin Kim6.
Abstract
Owing to their natural abundance and exceptional mechanical properties, cellulose fibers (CFs) have been used for reinforcing polymers. Despite these merits, dispersing hydrophilic CFs in a hydrophobic polymer matrix is challenging. To address this, an amphiphilic ammonium salt was employed as the dispersant for CFs in this study. The hydrophobic CFs were mixed with a healable polymer to produce CF-reinforced composites. As the thermosetting polymer was crosslinked with Diels⁻Alder (DA) adducts, it was mended and recycled via a retro DA reaction at 120 °C. Interestingly, the CF-reinforced polymer composites were mended and recycled as well. When 5 wt % of the hydrophobic CFs was added to the polymer, maximum tensile strength, elongation at break, Young's modulus, and toughness increased by 70%, 183%, 75%, and 420%, respectively. After recycling, the CF-reinforced composites still featured better mechanical properties than recycled polymer.Entities:
Keywords: cellulose; composite; healing; recycling; reinforced
Year: 2019 PMID: 30960101 PMCID: PMC6401934 DOI: 10.3390/polym11010117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Figure 1Cellulose fibers (CFs) in water/toluene solution after mixing. The CFs were treated with the following surfactants: (a) none, (b) tetramethylammonium chloride (TM), (c) tetrabutylammonium chloride (TB), and (d) hexadecyltrimethylammonium chloride (TH).
Scheme 1Synthesis of F-PU and DA-PU.
Figure 2Optical microscopy images. The surface of DA-PU (a) before and (b) after the healing process. The surface of the composite with 5 wt % CFs (c) before and (d) after the healing process.
Figure 3Stress-strain curves of CF-reinforced DA-PU composites (a) before and (b) after recycling.
Mechanical properties of polymer and composites.
| CF Content | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Elongation at Break | Young’s Modulus (MPa) | Toughness (MJ/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 wt % | 2.83 ± 0.06 | 53.55 ± 3.35 | 10.10 ± 0.32 | 1.09 ± 0.02 |
| 1 wt % | 3.70 ± 0.24 | 73.33 ± 8.63 | 10.80 ± 0.87 | 1.96 ± 0.04 |
| 3 wt % | 3.95 ± 0.31 | 88.33 ± 6.20 | 23.80 ± 2.67 | 2.62 ± 0.02 |
| 5 wt % | 4.83 ± 0.82 | 151.57 ± 28.01 | 17.74 ± 2.29 | 5.67 ± 0.06 |
| 7 wt % | 1.38 ± 0.25 | 36.66 ± 10.42 | 7.21 ± 1.60 | 0.35 ± 0.29 |
Figure 4SEM images of the surfaces of fractures in the composites after the tensile tests. Composites with a CF content of (a) 1 wt %, (b) 3 wt %, (c) 5 wt %, and (d) 7 wt %. Red circles indicate holes generated by the pullout of the CFs.
Mechanical properties of polymer and composites after recycling.
| CF Content | Tensile Strength (MPa) | Elongation at Break | Young’s Modulus (MPa) | Toughness (MJ/m3) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 wt % | 2.44 ± 0.09 | 81.67 ± 9.36 | 4.61 ± 0.25 | 1.48 ± 0.03 |
| 1 wt % | 2.61 ± 0.20 | 76.66 ±17.14 | 9.83 ± 1.50 | 1.63 ± 0.06 |
| 3 wt % | 2.96 ± 0.37 | 113.33 ± 12.73 | 9.14 ± 1.74 | 2.70 ± 0.04 |
| 5 wt % | 3.01 ± 0.81 | 245.00 ± 44.33 | 6.57 ± 1.36 | 4.80 ± 0.08 |
| 7 wt % | 1.73 ± 0.44 | 78.33 ± 42.30 | 4.00 ± 1.15 | 0.98 ± 0.71 |