| Literature DB >> 30960098 |
Grzegorz Kowalski1, Karolina Kijowska2, Mariusz Witczak3, Łukasz Kuterasiński4, Marcin Łukasiewicz5.
Abstract
The aim of the research was to develop new pectin-based hydrogels with excellent swelling properties. Superabsorbent hydrogels composed of high methylated pectin and partially neutralized poly(acrylic acid) was obtained by free radical polymerization in aqueous solution in the presence of crosslinking agent-N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide. The effect of crosslinker content and pectin to acrylic acid ratio on the swelling properties of hydrogels was investigated. In addition, the thermodynamic characteristic of hydrogels was obtained by DSC. Furthermore, the structure of pectin-based hydrogels was characterized by FTIR and GPC. It was also proved that poly(acrylic acid) is grafted on pectin particles. The results showed that introduction of small amount of pectin (up to 6.7 wt %) to poly(acrylic acid) hydrogel increase the swelling capacity, while further increasing of pectin ratio cause decrease of swelling.Entities:
Keywords: DSC; hydrogels; poly(acrylic acid), pectin; swelling
Year: 2019 PMID: 30960098 PMCID: PMC6401908 DOI: 10.3390/polym11010114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Reaction parameters of synthesized poly(acrylic acid)/pectin hydrogels.
| Sample | Pectin, g | MBA, g | AA, g |
|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 5 | 0.0048 | 30 |
| P2 | 0.0098 | ||
| P3 | 0.0188 | ||
| P4 | 0.0293 | ||
| P5 | 0.0504 | ||
| P6 | 0.0804 | ||
| P3A | 0 | 0.0188 | |
| P3B | 1 | ||
| P3C | 2 | ||
| P3D | 3 | ||
| P3E | 5 | ||
| P3F | 7 | ||
| P3G | 10 |
Figure 1Swelling capacity as the function of crosslinker to monomer ratio x and swelling time t of pectin-based hydrogels.
Figure 2Swelling capacity as the function of swelling time t for hydrogels with various ratio of pectin to monomers (P3A–P3G).
Figure 3Concentration of unreacted acrylic acid depending on the amount of (a) cross-linking agent (MBA); (b) pectin in the hydrogel samples, with reference to 1 g of hydrogel.
Molecular masses of sol fractions of poly(acrylic acid) hydrogels based on high methylated pectin.
| Sample | Ɖ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pectin | 0.88 | 7.60 | 8.6 |
| P1 | 0.55 | 1.39 | 2.5 |
| P2 | 0.40 | 0.92 | 2.3 |
| P3 | 0.54 | 1.55 | 2.8 |
| P4 | 0.48 | 1.60 | 3.3 |
| P5 | 0.85 | 2.92 | 3.4 |
| P6 | 0.73 | 2.97 | 4.1 |
| P3A | 0.53 | 1.66 | 3.1 |
| P3B | 0.58 | 1.94 | 3.4 |
| P3C | 0.61 | 2.05 | 3.4 |
| P3D | 0.84 | 3.45 | 4.1 |
| P3E | 0.54 | 1.63 | 3.0 |
| P3F | 0.73 | 3.33 | 4.6 |
| P3G | 0.71 | 2.63 | 3.7 |
Figure 4Molecular mass distribution for soluble fractions of pectin based hydrogels depending on (a) amount of cross-linking agent; (b) amount of high methylated pectin.
Figure 5Typical DSC curve of analyzed sample (second scan)—sample P3B.
Parameters characterized the glass transition process.
| Sample | Pectin, | MBA, | Δ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 5 | 0.0048 | 66.7 ± 0.2 c | 74.9 ± 0.1 d | 75.6 ± 0.1 c | 81.5 ± 0.2 c | 14.8 ± 0.3 bc | 0.613 ± 0.009 c |
| P2 | 5 | 0.0098 | 69.9 ± 0.2 e | 79.0 ± 0.1 j | 80.0 ± 0.3 g | 86.5 ± 0.2 g | 16.6 ± 0.3 e | 0.660 ± 0.001 d |
| P3 | 5 | 0.0188 | 67.0 ± 0.1 c | 75.4 ± 0.0 e | 76.3 ± 0.1 d | 82.5 ± 0.1 d | 15.5 ± 0.2 cd | 0.615 ± 0.000 c |
| P4 | 5 | 0.0293 | 64.8 ± 0.0 b | 73.0 ± 0.0 b | 73.6 ± 0.2 a | 79.7 ± 0.1 b | 14.9 ± 0.1 bc | 0.621 ± 0.011 c |
| P5 | 5 | 0.0504 | 73.7 ± 0.7 f | 82.9 ± 0.1 k | 84.1 ± 0.1 h | 90.4 ± 0.2 h | 16.7 ± 0.7 e | 0.672 ± 0.004 d |
| P6 | 5 | 0.0804 | 63.4 ± 0.3 a | 71.9 ± 0.1 a | 73.1 ± 0.3 a | 78.9 ± 0.0 a | 15.5 ± 0.3 cd | 0.621 ± 0.001 c |
| P3A | 0 | 0.0183 | 78.1 ± 0.1 g | 85.0 ± 0.0 l | 86.7 ± 0.1 i | 91.1 ± 0.1 i | 13.1 ± 0.2 a | 0.742 ± 0.009 g |
| P3B | 1 | 0.0181 | 69.3 ± 0.1 e | 77.1 ± 0.1 h | 78.4 ± 0.1 f | 83.4 ± 0.1 ef | 14.1 ± 0.2 b | 0.715 ± 0.010 f |
| P3C | 2 | 0.0185 | 69.7 ± 0.2 e | 77.4 ± 0.0 i | 78.0 ± 0.2 f | 83.8 ± 0.1 f | 14.1 ± 0.2 b | 0.690 ± 0.004 e |
| P3D | 3 | 0.0185 | 68.0 ± 0.2 d | 75.7 ± 0.1 f | 76.9 ± 0.4 e | 82.2 ± 0.4 d | 14.2 ± 0.4 b | 0.665 ± 0.002 d |
| P3E | 5 | 0.0188 | 67.0 ± 0.1 c | 75.4 ± 0.0 e | 76.3 ± 0.1 d | 82.5 ± 0.01 d | 15.5 ± 0.2 cd | 0.615 ± 0.0000 c |
| P3F | 7 | 0.0181 | 67.1 ± 0.1 c | 76.1 ± 0.1 g | 76.9 ± 0.0 e | 83.4 ± 0.1 e | 16.3 ± 0.2 de | 0.577 ± 0.010 b |
| P3G | 10 | 0.0178 | 65.0 ± 0.2 b | 74.4 ± 0.2 c | 75.1 ± 0.2 b | 81.7 ± 0.1 c | 16.8 ± 0.3 e | 0.504 ± 0.010 a |
| One-way ANOVA— | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
Differences between values signed the same letters in particular columns are non-significant at 0.05 level of confidence.
Parameters characterized the melting process.
| Sample | Pectin | MBA | −Δ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | 5 | 0.0048 | 189.5 ± 1.0 abcd | 192.2 ± 1.1 bc | 200.0 ± 0.6 b | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 185.6 ± 10.0 cd |
| P2 | 5 | 0.0098 | 191.1 ± 1.3 bcde | 193.7 ± 1.1 bcde | 200.8 ± 1.7 b | 9.7 ± 0.6 | 173.2 ± 1.3 e |
| P3 | 5 | 0.0188 | 188.4 ± 0.6 ab | 191.8 ± 1.0 ab | 200.9 ± 0.1 bc | 12.5 ± 0.9 | 183.9 ± 1.6 d |
| P4 | 5 | 0.0293 | 188.1 ± 1.0 ab | 191.3 ± 1.1 ab | 200.9 ± 0.2 b | 12.8 ± 1.3 | 194.1 ± 2.3 b |
| P5 | 5 | 0.0504 | 192.6 ± 0.9 de | 195.1 ± 1.1 de | 202.2 ± 0.5 bc | 9.6 ± 1.6 | 163.8 ± 2.7 f |
| P6 | 5 | 0.0804 | 189.3 ± 1.8 abc | 192.3 ± 2.1 bcd | 200.5 ± 1.7 b | 11.3 ± 0.4 | 193.9 ± 2.3 bc |
| P3A | 0 | 0.0183 | 197.8 ± 0.5 f | 200.4 ± 0.6 f | 207.9 ± 0.3 d | 10.1 ± 0.3 | 120.2 ± 0.1 h |
| P3B | 1 | 0.0181 | 193.8 ± 1.6 e | 196.2 ± 1.2 e | 203.7 ± 1.6 c | 10.0 ± 0.4 | 143.9 ± 6.0 g |
| P3C | 2 | 0.0185 | 192.3 ± 0.1 cde | 194.8 ± 0.3 cde | 201.9 ± 1.7 bc | 9.6 ± 2.0 | 159.0 ± 3.5 f |
| P3D | 3 | 0.0185 | 189.1 ± 2.6 ab | 191.9 ± 3.3 b | 199.8 ± 0.9 b | 10.8 ± 2.5 | 165.7 ± 1.8 ef |
| P3E | 5 | 0.0188 | 188.4 ± 0.6 ab | 191.8 ± 1.0 ab | 200.9 ± 0.1 b | 12.5 ± 0.9 | 183.9 ± 1.6 d |
| P3F | 7 | 0.0181 | 189.8 ± 0.6 bcd | 192.4 ± 0.1 bcd | 200.2 ± 1.9 b | 10.4 ± 2.0 | 184.0 ± 0.3 d |
| P3G | 10 | 0.0178 | 186.4 ± 1.7 a | 188.9 ± 1.8 a | 196.55 ± 1.9 a | 10.15 ± 0.0 | 203.8 ± 2.2 a |
| One-way ANOVA— | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.307 | <0.001 | ||
Differences between values signed the same letters in particular columns are non-significant at 0.05 level of confidence.
Figure 6Thermal capacity changes depending on the pectin content (○—experimental data, –––—calculated model, ----—95% confidence interval)).
Figure 7FT–IR spectra of pectin-based hydrogels depending on (a) amount of cross-linking agent; (b) amount of high methylated pectin.