| Literature DB >> 30959848 |
Meng-Ko Tsai1,2, Chao-Hung Lai3, Li-Mien Chen4, Gwo-Ping Jong5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chylous ascites is an uncommon condition characterized by a white, milky-appearing peritoneal fluid, and is related to disruption of the lymphatic system from any cause. There have been very few previous reports of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) as potential causes of chylous ascites, and most of the patients were undergoing peritoneal dialysis. AIMS: To review the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, laboratory examinations, treatment options, and prognosis of patients with CCB-related chylous ascites.Entities:
Keywords: calcium channel blockers; chylous ascites; end-stage renal disease; milky ascites/effluents
Year: 2019 PMID: 30959848 PMCID: PMC6518248 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8040466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.241
Clinical and laboratory findings of all patients.
| Year | Age (Years)/and Sex | Area | Drug | Received PD or Not | Effluent TG (mg/dL) | Time to Develop (h) | Time to Recovery (h) | Rechallenge Test | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | 39/2M, 3F | Japan | Manidipine | Yes | 13,26,12,13,32 | 24 | <24 | 1 performed | [ |
| 1998 | 7M, 7F | Japan | Manidipine, Benidipine, Nisoldipine, Nifedipine | Yes | NM | 48 | NM (Shortly) | 2 performed | [ |
| 1999 | 43F | Japan | Manidipine | No (renal dysfunction) | 81 | 192 | 288 | Not performed | [ |
| 2006 | NM | Turkey | Lercanidipine | Yes | NM | 24 | NM | NM | [ |
| 2008 | 52.6 ± 18.5, | Taiwan | Lercanidipine | Yes | 128.4 ± 133.0 | NM | <24 | 2 performed | [ |
| 2009 | 41/F | Taiwan | Lercanidipine | Yes | 251 | 72 | 16 h | Reproducible | [ |
| 2010 | 39.4 ± 14.3 | Taiwan | Lercanidipine | Yes | 19.3 ± 6.3 | 28.8 | <24 | 2 performed | [ |
| 2010 | 76/M | Japan | Azelnidipine | No (renal dysfunction) | NM | 48 | NM | NM | [ |
| 2012 | 55/M | India | Diltiazem | Yes | 55.6 | NM | <24 | Reproducible | [ |
| 2014 | 59/F | Spain | Lercanidipine | Yes | 20 | 72 | 24 | Reproducible | [ |
| 2016 | 65/M | India | Amlodipine | Yes | 293.8 | 72 | <24 | Not performed | [ |
| 2017 | 80/F | Spain | Lercanidipine | No (renal dysfunction) | 321 | 48 | NM | Not performed | [ |
| 2017 | 64/F | Turkey | Lercanidipine | Yes | 80 | 24 | 24 | Not performed | [ |
| 2017 | 82/M | Taiwan | Lercanidipine | Yes | NM | 72 | 24 | Not performed | Our patient |
| All | Mean:50 |
NM = not mentioned; TG = triglyceride.
The time of all patients to develop or recovery from chylous ascites/effluent after taking calcium channel blockers.
| <24 h | <48 h | <72 h | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to develop | 9/47 (19.1%) | 34/47 (72.3%) | 38/47 (80.1%) |
| Time to recovery | 44/45 (97.8%) | 44/45 (97.8%) | 44/45 (97.8%) |
| Symptoms (No.) | Had symptoms (9) | No symptoms (24) | Not mentioned (15) |
Triglyceride (chylous ascites/effluent) levels of all patients.
| PD (Mean) | No PD (Mean) | Retrospective/Prospective Reports | Case Reports | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triglyceride (mg/dL) | 74.1 | 201 | 59.1/70.6 * | 80.1/140.1 * |
| Total cases | 27 | 2 | 22/17 * | 10/5 * |
PD: Peritoneal dialysis. * p < 0.05.
The lipophilicity of all calcium channel blocker-associated chylous ascites.
| Classification | Drug | Case Number | Lipophilicity | Incidence | Percentage * |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dihydropyridine | Manidipine | 16 | 5.6 | 41.7% (15/36) | 33.3 (16/48) |
| Benidipine | 2 | 4.6 | 100% (2/2) | 4.2% (2/48) | |
| Nisoldipine | 1 | 3.3 | 9.1% (1/11) | 2.1% (1/48) | |
| Nifedipine | 1 | 2.2 | 0.6% (1/159) | 2.1% (1/48) | |
| Azelnidipine | 1 | 6.0 | N | 2.1% (1/48) | |
| Amlodipine | 1 | 3.0 | N | 2.1% (1/48) | |
| Lercanidipine | 25 | 6.9 | 24.7% (19/77) | 52.1 (25/48) | |
| Benzothiazepine | Diltiazem | 1 | 3.1 | N | 2.1% (1/48) |
N: Unknown. * Number/ Total number.