| Literature DB >> 30959748 |
Nicola Blackie1, Megan de Sousa2.
Abstract
Pig producers are required to provide environmental enrichment to provide pigs the opportunity to perform investigative and manipulative behaviours (EU directive 2001/93/EC). Preventing enrichment from losing its novelty and decreasing the rate at which animals become habituated is important to maintain use of enrichment over time. A comparative study was formulated to identify whether weaner pigs housed in a semi-barren environment displayed a preference for olfactory enrichment compared to non-scented enrichment. Pigs (n = 146) were selected at 28 days old from two different batches (n = 76 and n = 70) and divided into pens. All pigs were given a control and a treatment (garlic scented) rope. Behavioural observations and rope interactions were assessed through direct observation. Throughout the entire study, the length of interaction with the garlic device was significantly higher (p < 0.02), indicating that there was a preference for olfactory enrichment compared to an odourless device. There was no significant occurrence of tail, ear, or flank biting in both batches. Weaner pigs showed a preference towards olfactory enrichment. Although habituation began to occur, this effect was mitigated by re-spraying the ropes, which resulted in increased interactions.Entities:
Keywords: Pig; enrichment; garlic oil; olfactory; post-weaning; tail biting; welfare
Year: 2019 PMID: 30959748 PMCID: PMC6523841 DOI: 10.3390/ani9040148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Ethogram of behaviours recorded in weaned pigs.
| Behaviour | Description |
|---|---|
| Standing | Pig stood on all four limbs stationary |
| Feeding/drinking | Pig consuming supplied feed from trough/Pig latched on drinker and swallowing water |
| Interacting with others | Pigs actively seeking other pen-mate and chasing, sniffing, belly nosing and other general interactions |
| Enrichment use | Interaction the ropes including sniffing, chewing, thrashing with rope in mouth or walking with rope |
| Exploring environment | Rooting or licking action around parameter of environment |
| Locomotion | Pig walking around the pen with no clear purpose other than to reach a different area/device |
| Aggression (fighting) | Individuals nosing, biting resulting in both parties rearing onto hind limbs and pushing each other until an individual has fallen |
| Tail/ear/flank, biting | Individual seeking out aforementioned appendage and biting |
| Resting/sleeping | Animal lying down with eyes open or closed |
| O.F.S. (out of sight) | Selected individual is not visible |
Figure 1Length of time spent interacting with the control (untreated) rope compared with the garlic treated rope for each day over the study period. There was a significant effect of treatment (p = 0.017), but no effect of time (p = 0.159) or a treatment x time interaction (p = 0.307). The asterisk represents when the treatment rope was re-sprayed with garlic oil (day 8).
Figure 2Number of interactions observed within an hour for the control (untreated) rope compared with the garlic treated rope each day over the study period. There was a significant effect of treatment (p = 0.004), but no effect of time (p = 0.143) or a treatment x time interaction (p = 0.242). The asterisk represents when the treatment rope was re-sprayed with garlic oil (day 8).
Figure 3An example of pigs interacting with the garlic rope (left) or control rope (right). Focal pigs were marked with a spray marker to give individual identification.