Literature DB >> 30959541

Patient-Reported Functional and Satisfaction Outcomes after Robotic-Arm-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Results of a Prospective Multicenter Investigation.

Anton Khlopas1, Nipun Sodhi2, William J Hozack3, Antonia F Chen4, Ormonde M Mahoney5, Tracy Kinsey5, Fabio Orozco2, Michael A Mont1,2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a 3-month interim comparative analysis on outcomes between robotic-arm-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) and manual TKA patients. Specifically, we evaluated (1) patient self-reported symptoms, (2) expectations and satisfaction, and (3) functional activities, based on the 2011 Knee Society Scoring System. Between June 1, 2016, and March 31, 2018, 252 patients (102 manual and 150 robotic) were enrolled into a prospective, nonrandomized, open-label, multicenter comparative cohort study. Functional activity scores, patient-reported symptoms, as well as satisfaction and expectation scores were obtained from the 2011 Knee Society Scoring System preoperatively, at 4 to 6 weeks, and at 3 months postoperatively. Student's t-tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, and chi-square tests with α set at 0.05 were used to compare between-group mean improvements from baseline. At 4 to 6 weeks postoperatively, RATKA patients were found to have significantly larger improvements in walking and standing (1.4 vs. -1.2 points; p = 0.019). RATKA patients were also found to have larger improvements in advanced activities (1.3 vs. 2.3 points), pain with walking (3.3 vs. 3.2 points), satisfaction score (12.4 vs. 12 points), and expectations score (5.1 vs. 4.4 points) when compared with manual TKA patients. At 3 months, RATKA patients were also found to have larger improvements in walking and standing (6.0 vs. 4.8 points), standard activities (11.4 vs. 10.1 points), advanced activities (6.2 vs. 4.6 points), functional activities total score (22.8 vs. 21.2 points), pain with walking (4.3 vs. 4.1 points), total symptoms score (10.5 vs. 10.3 points), satisfaction score (17.0 vs. 15.5 points), expectations score (4.8 vs. 4.0 points) when compared with manual TKA patients. The data indicate RATKA patients to have equal or greater improvements in 9 out of 10 of the Knee Society Scoring System components assessed at 3 months postoperatively, though not all findings were statistically significant. Since this is an early results report, this study will be continued for a longer follow-up, but we are encouraged by these interim results. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30959541     DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1684014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  16 in total

Review 1.  Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Sujith Konan; Atif Ayuob; Elliot Onochie; Talal Al-Jabri; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2019-10-01

2.  Decreased patient comorbidities and post-operative complications in technology-assisted compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ryan J O'Rourke; Anthony J Milto; Brian P Kurcz; Steven L Scaife; D Gordon Allan; Youssef El Bitar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A new robotically assisted technique can improve outcomes of total knee arthroplasty comparing to an imageless navigation system.

Authors:  Fabio Mancino; Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi; Rudy Sangaletti; Ludovico Lucenti; Flavio Terragnoli; Francesco Benazzo
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 4.  Use of intraoperative technology in total knee arthroplasty is not associated with reductions in postoperative pain.

Authors:  Andrew G Kim; Zachary Bernhard; Alexander J Acuña; Victoria S Wu; Atul F Kamath
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.114

Review 5.  Is it prime time for robotic-assisted TKAs? A systematic review of current studies.

Authors:  Arun B Mullaji; Ahmed A Khalifa
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-08

6.  Safe and effective use of active robotics for TKA: Early results of a multicenter study.

Authors:  Bernard N Stulberg; Jayson D Zadzilka; Stefan Kreuzer; Yair D Kissin; Ralph Liebelt; William J Long; Valentina Campanelli
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-07-23

Review 7.  The evolution of robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty, each system must be assessed for its own value: a systematic review of clinical evidence and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hannes Vermue; Cécile Batailler; Paul Monk; Fares Haddad; Thomas Luyckx; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-09-25       Impact factor: 2.928

8.  Comparison of patient reported outcomes after robotic versus manual total knee arthroplasty in the same patient undergoing staged bilateral knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Praharsha Mulpur; A B Suhas Masilamani; Mrinal Prakash; Adarsh Annapareddy; Kushal Hippalgaonkar; A V Gurava Reddy
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-19

9.  Robotic-assisted surgery and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL study): a protocol of a national registry-nested, multicentre, 2×2 factorial randomised trial assessing clinical, intraoperative, functional, radiographic and survivorship outcomes.

Authors:  Samuel J MacDessi; Gregory C Wernecke; Durga Bastiras; Tamara Hooper; Emma Heath; Michelle Lorimer; Ian Harris
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 10.  Clinical outcomes associated with robotic and computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: a machine learning-augmented systematic review.

Authors:  Quinlan D Buchlak; Joe Clair; Nazanin Esmaili; Arshad Barmare; Siva Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.