| Literature DB >> 30959363 |
Jiro Kimura1, Kentaro Yoshikawa2, Takashi Sakamoto3, Alan Kawarai Lefor4, Tadao Kubota5.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Sciatic hernias are the least common type of pelvic floor hernias. The purpose of this study was to present a novel technique for manual reduction and to conduct a systematic review of previous reports of sciatic hernias to characterize them and review the outcomes. PRESENTATION OF CASE: An 86-year-old female presented with left-sided lumbar pain. She had a past medical history of rheumatoid arthritis and was treated with prednisolone and methotrexate. Her left abdomen and left lumbar area were tender. An unenhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed invagination of the left ureter into the left sciatic foramen and a dilated left proximal ureter and renal pelvis. Ultrasonography showed an invaginated left ureter viewing from the left buttock. She was diagnosed with a sciatic hernia. Ultrasound-guided manual transvaginal reduction was performed. Post-procedure unenhanced abdominal computed tomography scan confirmed reduction of the ureter. After 10-months of follow-up, there is no evidence of recurrence. DISCUSSION: Previous reports of patients with sciatic hernia were identified. Clinical data associated with the hernia, reduction technique and clinical outcomes were collected for 72 patients. Open reduction was performed in 24 patients. A ureteral stent was placed in eight patients when the hernia contained the ureter. Four postoperative complications including one death were reported in adults. There were no reports of closed manual reduction.Entities:
Keywords: Manual reduction; Sciatic hernia; Ureter
Year: 2019 PMID: 30959363 PMCID: PMC6453801 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2019.03.036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep ISSN: 2210-2612
Fig. 1Unenhanced abdominal computed tomography scan revealed invagination of the left ureter into the left sciatic foramen (arrow). a. axial view, b. coronal view.
Fig. 2Ultrasonographic imaging shows an invaginated left ureter (arrow) and the ilium (arrowhead) when the probe was placed on the left buttock.
Fig. 3Ultrasound-guided manual transvaginal reduction was performed. Tension was placed on the ureter and nearby retroperitoneum by the right index and middle finger of the operator.
Fig. 4The ultrasound probe was placed on the left buttock of the patient during the procedure and the invaginated ureter was reduced (arrow).
Fig. 5Post-procedure unenhanced abdominal computed tomography scan confirmed reduction of the left ureter (arrow). a. axial view, b. coronal view.
Reports of adult patients with a sciatic hernia.
| No. | Author | Year | Age | M/F | BMI (kg/m2) | L/R | Hernia contents | Treatment | Follow up (months) | Complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Summers [ | 1921 | 35 | M | none | R | myxoma | Observation | NA | NA |
| 2 | Lindbom [ | 1946 | 54 | F | none | L | left ureter | open, resection of the left ureter | NA | none |
| 3 | Lawson [ | 1948 | 39 | M | none | R | small bowel | open, reduction of small bowel | 1 | none |
| 4 | Beck [ | 1952 | 66 | F | none | L | left ureter | Open | NA | heart failure |
| 5 | Kerry [ | 1964 | 57 | F | none | L | retroperitoneal lipoma | open and gluteal incision | none | none |
| 6 | Sadek [ | 1969 | 33 | F | none | L | small bowel | open, resection of neurofibroma, 10 days later gluteal incision | 8 | none |
| 7 | Rothchild [ | 1969 | 65 | F | 17.4 | L | left ureter | open, lateral peritoneum was brought beneath the ureter | NA | none |
| 8 | Franken [ | 1969 | 58 | F | none | B | bilateral ureter | open, repair | NA | none |
| 9 | Ghahremani [ | 1991 | 72 | F | none | R | ileum | transgluteal approach | NA | none |
| 10 | Ivanov [ | 1993 | 60 | F | none | R | cecum, appendix, small bowel and sigmoid colon | Open | 5 | none |
| 11 | Epner [ | 1994 | 86 | F | none | L | left ureter | Antibiotics | NA | NA |
| 12 | Ritschel [ | 1995 | 51 | F | 13.2 | L | left ureter | double J stent→ fail, open | NA | none |
| 13 | Losanoff [ | 1995 | 29 | F | none | R | terminal ileum | transgluteal approach | 4 | none |
| 14 | Hayashi [ | 1995 | 44 | F | none | L | ileum and urinary bladder | open and transgluteal approach | 6 | none |
| 15 | Servant [ | 1998 | 66 | F | none | L | ileum and rectosigmoid colon | Open | NA | perforation before operation |
| 16 | Gee [ | 1999 | 60 | F | 25.0 | L | left ureter | Laparoscopy | 24 | none |
| 17 | Noller [ | 2000 | 62 | F | none | L | left ureter | left Gibson incision, retroperitoneal approach | NA | none |
| 18 | Yu [ | 2002 | 71 | F | none | R | ileum | open, resection of the ileum | 12 | none |
| 19 | Touloupidis [ | 2006 | 61 | F | none | R | right ureter | open, ureterolysis, reimplantation of the ureter in psoas hitch | NA | NA |
| 20 | Kohashi [ | 2006 | 80 | F | none | R | small bowel | open | 13 | none |
| 21 | Dundamadappa [ | 2006 | 90 | F | none | R | right ovary | open | NA | NA |
| 22 | Skipworth [ | 2006 | 36 | F | none | R | liposarcoma | abdomino-perineal approach | 24 | none |
| 23 | Witney Smith [ | 2007 | 59 | F | none | L | left ureter | laparoscopy | 3 | none |
| 24 | Loffroy [ | 2007 | 81 | F | none | L | left ureter | open, resection of ureter, doubleJstent | 3 | none |
| 25 | Tsai [ | 2008 | 91 | F | none | L | left ureter | observation | NA | none |
| 26 | Tokunaga [ | 2008 | 72 | F | none | R | small bowel | transgluteal approach | NA | none |
| 27 | Speeg [ | 2009 | 82 | F | none | L | left ureter | laparoscopy→open,resection of ureter | 1.5 | none |
| 28 | Paira [ | 2010 | 35 | F | none | L | dermoid cyst | laparoscopy→open,resection of tumor | NA | NA |
| 29 | Clemens [ | 2010 | 80 | F | none | L | left ureter | double J stent | NA | none |
| 30 | Chitranjan [ | 2010 | 55 | F | none | L | sigmoid colon | NA | NA | NA |
| 31 | Bernard [ | 2010 | 72 | F | none | R | small bowel, right ovary | laparoscopy | 12 | none |
| 32 | Singh [ | 2011 | 79 | F | none | R | preperitoneal fat | robot | NA | none |
| 33 | Rather [ | 2011 | 80 | F | none | L | small bowel | open | 7 | none |
| 34 | Sugimoto [ | 2011 | 76 | F | none | L | left ureter | stent | 3 | none |
| 35 | Lopez [ | 2012 | 50 | F | none | R | lipoma | transgluteal approach, resection | 6 | none |
| 36 | Andraus [ | 2012 | 64 | F | none | L | ascites | NA | none | death |
| 37 | Whybum [ | 2013 | 74 | F | none | B | bilateral ureter | laparoscopy | NA | NA |
| 38 | Labib [ | 2013 | 80 | F | none | R | colon | observation | NA | NA |
| 39 | Pimenta [ | 2014 | 55 | F | none | L | lipoma | transgluteal approach | 24 | none |
| 40 | Tsuzaka [ | 2014 | 78 | F | 14.5 | L | left ureter | laparoscopy | 8 | none |
| 41 | Kato [ | 2014 | 72 | F | none | L | left ureter | stent | 72 | recurrence after stent removal |
| 42 | Duran [ | 2015 | 39 | F | none | L | osteolipoma | surgery (no data in detail) | NA | NA |
| 43 | Salari [ | 2015 | 87 | F | 14.4 | R | right ureter | stent | 12 | none |
| 44 | Yanagi [ | 2015 | 92 | F | none | L | left ureter | stent | 12 | none |
| 45 | Dulskas [ | 2015 | 53 | M | 29.0 | R | lipoma | open, resection | NA | none |
| 46 | Colombo [ | 2016 | 65 | F | 21.0 | R | right ovary, adnexa | laparoscopy | 3 | none |
| 47 | Regelman [ | 2016 | 60 | F | none | L | left ureter | robotic, ureterolysis | 6 | none |
| 48 | Demetriou [ | 2016 | 76 | F | none | L | left ureter | observation | 6 | none |
| 49 | Imamura [ | 2006 | 83 | F | 14.0 | R | ileum | open | 1 | pneumonia |
| 50 | Uchida [ | 2010 | 75 | F | 14.1 | R | ileum | observation | 15 | none |
| 51 | Tanaka [ | 2011 | 84 | F | 12.4 | R | appendix | open, ileocecectomy | 6 | anastomotic leakage |
| 52 | Ema [ | 2011 | 75 | F | 16.4 | L | ileum | open, ileocecectomy | 20 | none |
| 53 | Eriguchi [ | 2012 | 74 | M | 17.2 | L | left ureter | DJ stent | NA | none |
| 54 | Asanuma [ | 2012 | 83 | F | 19.6 | R | small bowel | open | 7 | none |
| 55 | Tsutsui [ | 2014 | 76 | F | 21.2 | L | left ureter | DJ stent | 6 | none |
| 56 | Taguchi [ | 2014 | 84 | F | 22.9 | R | right ovary | lap, resection of right ovary and right adnexa uteri | 12 | none |
| 57 | Iida [ | 2015 | 60 | F | 17.1 | R | right ovary and right fimbriae of uterine tube | lap, patch closure | 12 | none |
| 58 | Kise [ | 2016 | 36 | F | 17.5 | L | left ureter | DJstent | 12 | none |
| 59 | Nitta [ | 2016 | 93 | F | 19.2 | R | small bowel | open, resection of paro-ovarian cyst | NA | recurrence |
| 60 | Ishikawa [ | 2017 | 77 | F | 23.2 | R | small bowel | lap, mesh plug and patch | 12 | none |
| 61 | Our patient | 2018 | 86 | F | 20.9 | L | left ureter | manual reduction | 10 | none |
NA=not applicable, BMI = body mass index, L = Left, R = Right, M = Male, F = Female.
Reports of child patients with a sciatic hernia.
| No. | Author | Year | Age (days) | M/F | BMI | L/R | Contents | Treatment | Follow- up (m) | Complications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henegar [ | 1952 | 660 | M | none | R | cecum and right ureter | right gluteal incision | 6 | hypertrophy of the scar |
| 2 | Gaffney [ | 1958 | 150 | F | none | L | none | left gluteal incision | 12 | none |
| 3 | Chamberlain [ | 1958 | 2 | F | none | L | retroperitoneal teratoma | open, resection of the tumor | none | death due to bronchopneumonia |
| 4 | Franken [ | 1969 | 60 | M | none | B | bilateral ureter | none | NA | NA |
| 5 | Franken [ | 1969 | 35 | F | none | L | rectosigmoid | none, spontaneous recovery | NA | NA |
| 6 | Bohnert [ | 1971 | 60 | M | none | B | bilateral ureter | none | 12 | Urinary Tract Infection |
| 7 | Lebowit [ | 1973 | 45 | F | none | R | right ureter | none | NA | NA |
| 8 | Attar [ | 1992 | 540 | M | none | R | sigmoid colon | right gluteal incision | NA | NA |
| 9 | Arat [ | 1998 | 90 | F | none | L | left ureter | NA | NA | NA |
| 10 | Seifarth [ | 2014 | 49 | M | none | R | ileum | laparoscopy→open | 36 | none |
| 11 | Nosek [ | 2015 | 1 | M | none | R | duplication of rectum | laparoscopy→transgluteal, endorectal pull through | 24 | none |
NA=not applicable, BMI = Body mass index, L = left, R = right, M = Male, F = Female.