Literature DB >> 30959206

Assisting radiologists with reporting urgent findings to referring physicians: A machine learning approach to identify cases for prompt communication.

Xing Meng1, Craig H Ganoe2, Ryan T Sieberg3, Yvonne Y Cheung3, Saeed Hassanpour4.   

Abstract

Radiologists are expected to expediently communicate critical and unexpected findings to referring clinicians to prevent delayed diagnosis and treatment of patients. However, competing demands such as heavy workload along with lack of administrative support resulted in communication failures that accounted for 7% of the malpractice payments made from 2004 to 2008 in the United States. To address this problem, we have developed a novel machine learning method that can automatically and accurately identify cases that require prompt communication to referring physicians based on analyzing the associated radiology reports. This semi-supervised learning approach requires a minimal amount of manual annotations and was trained on a large multi-institutional radiology report repository from three major external healthcare organizations. To test our approach, we created a corpus of 480 radiology reports from our own institution and double-annotated cases that required prompt communication by two radiologists. Our evaluation on the test corpus achieved an F-score of 74.5% and recall of 90.0% in identifying cases for prompt communication. The implementation of the proposed approach as part of an online decision support system can assist radiologists in identifying radiological cases for prompt communication to referring physicians to avoid or minimize potential harm to patients.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluster analysis; Distributional semantics; Radiologist prompt communication; Radiology report; Semi-supervised learning

Year:  2019        PMID: 30959206      PMCID: PMC6506378          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  16 in total

1.  Automatic structuring of radiology free-text reports.

Authors:  R K Taira; S G Soderland; R M Jakobovits
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program.

Authors:  A R Aronson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

3.  Information extraction from biomedical text.

Authors:  Jerry R Hobbs
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  Mayo clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES): architecture, component evaluation and applications.

Authors:  Guergana K Savova; James J Masanz; Philip V Ogren; Jiaping Zheng; Sunghwan Sohn; Karin C Kipper-Schuler; Christopher G Chute
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Communicating critical results in radiology.

Authors:  Sarwat Hussain
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 5.532

6.  A text processing pipeline to extract recommendations from radiology reports.

Authors:  Meliha Yetisgen-Yildiz; Martin L Gunn; Fei Xia; Thomas H Payne
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Using statistical text classification to identify health information technology incidents.

Authors:  Kevin E K Chai; Stephen Anthony; Enrico Coiera; Farah Magrabi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Communication of unexpected and significant findings on chest radiographs with an automated PACS alert system.

Authors:  Sara A Hayes; Michael Breen; Patrick D McLaughlin; Kevin P Murphy; Michael T Henry; Michael M Maher; Max F Ryan
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.532

9.  Extracting diagnoses and investigation results from unstructured text in electronic health records by semi-supervised machine learning.

Authors:  Zhuoran Wang; Anoop D Shah; A Rosemary Tate; Spiros Denaxas; John Shawe-Taylor; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Development of phenotype algorithms using electronic medical records and incorporating natural language processing.

Authors:  Katherine P Liao; Tianxi Cai; Guergana K Savova; Shawn N Murphy; Elizabeth W Karlson; Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan; Vivian S Gainer; Stanley Y Shaw; Zongqi Xia; Peter Szolovits; Susanne Churchill; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-04-24
View more
  4 in total

1.  Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians.

Authors:  Fatemeh Homayounieh; Ramandeep Singh; Tianqi Chen; Ellen J Sugarman; Thomas J Schultz; Subba R Digumarthy; Keith J Dreyer; Mannudeep K Kalra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Overview of Noninterpretive Artificial Intelligence Models for Safety, Quality, Workflow, and Education Applications in Radiology Practice.

Authors:  Yasasvi Tadavarthi; Valeria Makeeva; William Wagstaff; Henry Zhan; Anna Podlasek; Neil Bhatia; Marta Heilbrun; Elizabeth Krupinski; Nabile Safdar; Imon Banerjee; Judy Gichoya; Hari Trivedi
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2022-02-02

3.  Natural language processing for automated annotation of medication mentions in primary care visit conversations.

Authors:  Craig H Ganoe; Weiyi Wu; Paul J Barr; William Haslett; Michelle D Dannenberg; Kyra L Bonasia; James C Finora; Jesse A Schoonmaker; Wambui M Onsando; James Ryan; Glyn Elwyn; Martha L Bruce; Amar K Das; Saeed Hassanpour
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2021-08-19

4.  A Web Application for Adrenal Incidentaloma Identification, Tracking, and Management Using Machine Learning.

Authors:  Wasif Bala; Jackson Steinkamp; Timothy Feeney; Avneesh Gupta; Abhinav Sharma; Jake Kantrowitz; Nicholas Cordella; James Moses; Frederick Thurston Drake
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2020-09-16       Impact factor: 2.342

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.