| Literature DB >> 30959024 |
Tanushree Patra1, Mukesh Kumar Gupta2.
Abstract
Reports on the vitrification of somatic cells are scarce. Here, we show that Leydig cells (murine cell line TM3) could be successfully vitrified by both open vitrification [plastic straw (PS) and plastic vials (PV)] and closed ultravitrification [microdrop (MD) and solid surface vitrification (SSV)], after protocol optimization. However, open ultravitrification resulted in better post-warming viability than closed systems of vitrification with highest success obtained in modified SSV (84.8 ± 1.86%; p < 0.05). Leydig cells vitrified-warmed by modified SSV also showed superior (p < 0.05) cell growth, mitochondrial activity and cytoplasmic esterase enzyme activity, than MD, PS and PV, respectively. It was also observed that vitrified-warmed cells had higher level of ROS activity than non-vitrified control cells (41.6 ± 4.0 vs. 16.7 ± 1.0; p < 0.05). Treatment of cells with glutathione (GSH) or 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME) (0, 10, 50, 100 μM) significantly (p < 0.05) reduced the ROS activity but had no significant (p > 0.05) effect on post-warm viability. Nevertheless, antioxidant-treated cells had improved mitochondrial activity, cytoplasmic esterase activity and cell growth during in vitro culture (p < 0.05). In conclusion, our results suggest that modified SSV offers a viable method for vitrifying single cell suspension of Leydig cells. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on cryopreservation of Leydig cells by vitrification.Entities:
Keywords: Antioxidant; Glutathione; Leydig cells; Mercaptoethanol; Modified solid surface vitrification; ROS activity; SSV
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30959024 DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2019.04.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cryobiology ISSN: 0011-2240 Impact factor: 2.487