Literature DB >> 30958974

Sex differences in psychosocial and cardiometabolic health among patients completing cardiac rehabilitation.

Tasuku Terada1, Daniele Chirico1, Heather E Tulloch2,3, Kyle Scott1, Andrew L Pipe2,3, Jennifer L Reed1,3,4.   

Abstract

Current programs of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) typically provide a standardized approach to all patients. We examined whether CR would produce similar improvements in psychosocial and cardiometabolic health indicators in women compared with men. The records of patients who completed a 3-month outpatient CR program were examined. We compared health-related quality of life (i.e., Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores), anxiety, depression, and cardiometabolic health indicators between women and men completing CR. Of the 591 participants who completed CR, 155 (26.2%) were women and 436 (73.8%) were men. At baseline, women were older (64 ± 9 vs. 62 ± 9 years, p = 0.045), had lower PCS (39.5 ± 8.1 vs. 43.9 ± 7.8 points, p < 0.001), and MCS (46.6 ± 10.8 vs. 49.4 ± 9.8 points, p = 0.003) scores, experienced elevated levels of anxiety (6.4 ± 4.0 vs. 5.2 ± 4.0 points, p = 0.001) and depression (4.7 ± 3.5 vs. 3.6 ± 3.3 points, p = 0.001), and had higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 1.7 ± 0.7 mmol/L, p < 0.001) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (1.4 ± 0.4 vs. 1.1 ± 0.3 mmol/L, p < 0.001) concentrations when compared with men. Following CR, women showed smaller improvements in percent body mass (+1.1% ± 10.1% vs. -2.1% ± 9.7%, p = 0.002) and PCS scores (3.0 ± 8.1 vs. 6.3 ± 7.5 points, p < 0.001) when compared with men. Considering poorer psychosocial health at baseline and smaller improvements in health-related quality of life in women when compared with men, more specific CR strategies addressing the particular needs of women are required to improve their health status and reduce the risk of secondary cardiac events.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anxiety; anxiété; cardiovascular risk factors; depression; dépression; exercice; exercise; facteurs de risque cardiovasculaire; femmes; quality of life; qualité de vie; women

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30958974     DOI: 10.1139/apnm-2018-0876

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Physiol Nutr Metab        ISSN: 1715-5312            Impact factor:   2.665


  3 in total

Review 1.  Sex Differences in Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcomes.

Authors:  Joshua R Smith; Randal J Thomas; Amanda R Bonikowske; Shane M Hammer; Thomas P Olson
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 23.213

2.  Women's outcomes following mixed-sex, women-only, and home-based cardiac rehabilitation participation and comparison by sex.

Authors:  Fiorella A Heald; Susan Marzolini; Tracey J F Colella; Paul Oh; Rajni Nijhawan; Sherry L Grace
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

3.  The feasibility of implementing high-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation settings: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Kimberley L Way; Sol Vidal-Almela; Marja-Leena Keast; Harleen Hans; Andrew L Pipe; Jennifer L Reed
Journal:  BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.