Literature DB >> 30958489

Personal electronic UVR dosimeter measurements: specific and general uncertainties.

Jakob Heydenreich1, Hans Christian Wulf.   

Abstract

Personal ultraviolet radiation (UVR) dosimetry has been performed for decades to objectively measure human exposure to UVR. These measurements have been used to investigate solar behaviour and its negative effects on human health such as skin cancer and positive effects such as vitamin D formation. A specific electronic dosimeter is described with a spectral sensitivity as the erythema response for human skin and temperature measurements for compliance control. Technical, methodological and environmental causes of uncertainties regarding personal UV dosimetry are investigated using this dosimeter as an example, which enables us to show the dosimeter's limitations and enables readers to compare their dosimeters with that described and to increase awareness of imperfections of dosimeters. The dosimeter's spectral response, cosine response, linearity, temperature dependency and sensitivity are investigated. As opposed to biological and chemical dosimeters, electronic dosimeters do not measure UV radiation continuously but at time-intervals (sampling). The error introduced by sampling is investigated for sampling intervals from 1 second up to 60 seconds for 3 groups of people (n = 18, 1.1-4.6 hours of positive UV measurements) on sunny (n = 12) and cloudy (n = 6) days. Increasing the sample time by 1 second added on average an uncertainty of maximum +0.29% to -0.27% per added second compared to the 1-second sample time. The importance of dirt on the sensor was investigated in 24 dosimeters after 6 months use by farmers. The reduction in the registered dose due to the dirty sensor was 2.3% (median = 2.0%, inter-quartile range = 2.0%, max = 5%) suggesting that dirt on the sensor generally does not play a significant role.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30958489     DOI: 10.1039/c8pp00379c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci        ISSN: 1474-905X            Impact factor:   3.982


  3 in total

Review 1.  Review of Wearable and Portable Sensors for Monitoring Personal Solar UV Exposure.

Authors:  Xiyong Huang; Andrew N Chalmers
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Ultraviolet radiation exposure to the face in patients with xeroderma pigmentosum and healthy controls: applying a novel methodology to define photoprotection behaviour.

Authors:  R P E Sarkany; M Canfield; M Morgan; L Foster; K Johnstone; K Sainsbury; V Araujo-Soares; H C Wulf; J Weinman; J Walburn; S Norton
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 11.113

3.  Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Risk Estimates-A Comparison of Different Action Spectra and Detector Responsivities.

Authors:  Friedo Zölzer; Stefan Bauer
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.