Literature DB >> 30958322

A dosimetric comparison of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) and High Dose Rate (HDR) brachytherapy in localized cervical cancer radiotherapy.

Lila Wali1, Azza Helal1,2, Reem Darwesh1, Mohammed Attar3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer radiotherapy is usually administrated through 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy (3DCRT) followed by a brachytherapy (BT) boost.
PURPOSE: To investigate whether Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) can replace High Dose Rate (HDR) intracavitary BT boost for patients undergoing cervical cancer radiotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed Tomography (CT) images for ten patients with tandem and ovoids were included in this study. Target volumes, rectum, bladder, sigmoid, small bowel and both femoral heads were delineated. Two plans were carried out including (a) a BT plan optimized manually by modifying dwell time and Ir-192 source positions, (b) a VMAT plan generated using two partial arcs with 10 MV photon beam. The prescribed dose was 7 Gy. The relevant dose volume parameters (DVPs) of target volumes and OARs for the two plans were analyzed statistically using SPSS Wilcoxon Signed Rank test.
RESULTS: VMAT plan showed a significant reduction of 9.1%, 9.3%, 15.4%, 14.4% and 13.1% in rectum maximum dose, rectum D2cc, bladder maximum dose, bladder D2cc and sigmoid maximum dose (P < 0.05). VMAT and BT plans showed comparable D2cc of sigmoid and small bowel maximum doses (P = 0.333 and P = 0.646). On the other hand, VMAT showed significantly higher small bowel D2cc and maximum point dose for both femoral heads comparing to BT plan (P < 0.05). Also, VMAT plan yielded greater homogeneous target coverage compared to BT plan (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated that VMAT plan achieves significant dose reduction of rectum, bladder and sigmoid, as well as superior homogeneous target coverage compared to BT plan. On the other hand, VMAT delivers more radiation exposures to small bowel and femoral heads.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cervical cancer; Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy; high dose rate; intracavitary brachytherapy

Year:  2019        PMID: 30958322     DOI: 10.3233/XST-180468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol        ISSN: 0895-3996            Impact factor:   1.535


  3 in total

1.  Study on the ability of 3D gamma analysis and bio-mathematical model in detecting dose changes caused by dose-calculation-grid-size (DCGS).

Authors:  Han Bai; Sijin Zhu; Xingrao Wu; Xuhong Liu; Feihu Chen; Jiawen Yan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Proton Arc Therapy vs Interstitial HDR Brachytherapy in Gynecologic Cancer with Parametrial/pelvic Side Wall Extension.

Authors:  ByongYong Yi; Sina Mossahebi; Arezoo Modiri; Elizabeth M Nichols; Mariana Guerrero; Narottam Lamichhane; Pranshu Mohindra
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 3.  The value of brachytherapy in the age of advanced external beam radiotherapy: a review of the literature in terms of dosimetry.

Authors:  Tibor Major; Georgina Fröhlich; Péter Ágoston; Csaba Polgár; Zoltán Takácsi-Nagy
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 3.621

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.