PURPOSE: To quantify possible differences in sprint mechanical outputs in handball and basketball players according to playing standard and position. METHODS: Sprint tests of 298 male players were analyzed. Theoretical maximal velocity (v0), horizontal force (F0), horizontal power (Pmax), force-velocity slope (SFV), ratio of force (RFmax), and index of force application technique (DRF) were calculated from anthropometric and spatiotemporal data using an inverse dynamic approach applied to the center-of-mass movement. RESULTS: National-team handball players displayed clearly superior 10-m times (0.03, ±0.02 s), 40-m times (0.12, ±0.07 s), F0 (0.1, ±0.2 N·kg-1), v0 (0.3, ±0.2 m·s-1), and Pmax (0.9, ±0.5 W·kg-1) than corresponding top-division players. Wings differed from the other positions in terms of superior 10-m times (0.02, ±0.01 to 0.07, ±0.02 s), 40-m times (0.07, ±0.05 to 0.27, ±0.07 s), F0 (0.2, ±0.1 to 0.4, ±0.2 N·kg-1), v0 (0.1, ±0.1 to 0.5, ±0.1 m·s-1), Pmax (0.7, ±0.4 to 2.0, ±0.5 W·kg-1), and RFmax (0.6, ±0.4 to 1.3, ±0.4%). In basketball, guards differed from forwards in terms of superior 10-m times (0.03, ±0.02 s), 40-m times (0.10, ±0.08 s), v0 (0.2, ±0.1 m·s-1), Pmax (0.6, ±0.6 W·kg-1), and RFmax (0.4, ±0.3%). The effect magnitudes of the substantial differences observed ranged from small to large. CONCLUSIONS: The present results provide an overall picture of the force-velocity profile continuum in sprinting handball and basketball players and serve as useful background information for practitioners when diagnosing individual players and prescribing training programs.
PURPOSE: To quantify possible differences in sprint mechanical outputs in handball and basketball players according to playing standard and position. METHODS: Sprint tests of 298 male players were analyzed. Theoretical maximal velocity (v0), horizontal force (F0), horizontal power (Pmax), force-velocity slope (SFV), ratio of force (RFmax), and index of force application technique (DRF) were calculated from anthropometric and spatiotemporal data using an inverse dynamic approach applied to the center-of-mass movement. RESULTS: National-team handball players displayed clearly superior 10-m times (0.03, ±0.02 s), 40-m times (0.12, ±0.07 s), F0 (0.1, ±0.2 N·kg-1), v0 (0.3, ±0.2 m·s-1), and Pmax (0.9, ±0.5 W·kg-1) than corresponding top-division players. Wings differed from the other positions in terms of superior 10-m times (0.02, ±0.01 to 0.07, ±0.02 s), 40-m times (0.07, ±0.05 to 0.27, ±0.07 s), F0 (0.2, ±0.1 to 0.4, ±0.2 N·kg-1), v0 (0.1, ±0.1 to 0.5, ±0.1 m·s-1), Pmax (0.7, ±0.4 to 2.0, ±0.5 W·kg-1), and RFmax (0.6, ±0.4 to 1.3, ±0.4%). In basketball, guards differed from forwards in terms of superior 10-m times (0.03, ±0.02 s), 40-m times (0.10, ±0.08 s), v0 (0.2, ±0.1 m·s-1), Pmax (0.6, ±0.6 W·kg-1), and RFmax (0.4, ±0.3%). The effect magnitudes of the substantial differences observed ranged from small to large. CONCLUSIONS: The present results provide an overall picture of the force-velocity profile continuum in sprinting handball and basketball players and serve as useful background information for practitioners when diagnosing individual players and prescribing training programs.
Entities:
Keywords:
speed; sprint mechanical capacities; team sports
Authors: Matthew Morrison; David T Martin; Scott Talpey; Aaron T Scanlan; Jace Delaney; Shona L Halson; Jonathon Weakley Journal: Sports Med Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 11.928
Authors: Damian J Harper; Alistair J McBurnie; Thomas Dos' Santos; Ola Eriksrud; Martin Evans; Daniel D Cohen; David Rhodes; Christopher Carling; John Kiely Journal: Sports Med Date: 2022-05-29 Impact factor: 11.928